Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st credit & Vanquis Bank/credit card advice needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4552 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'll try to keep this brief.

 

I had/have a vanquis bank credit card, I hold my hands up and say I defaulted on payments and now owe them just shy of £600.

At the end of last year I got into finiancial difficulty and like an ostrich hid my head in the sand:sad:

I have since paid off one of my debts, today a company called 1st credit called me to say Vanquis had passed the debt to them.

 

Again I stress I don't dispute the money because I do owe it but like thousands of others I'm not in a position right now to pay it in full which they demanded.

They then offered to discount the debt to £450 BUT I had to pay it over three months £150.00.

 

I offered £30 a month to start with as that is all I can truely afford, I explained to them I wanted to pay it but would not be bullied into paying more than I could afford as then I would default and be back to square one!

They have told me that Vanquis have put a limit on when the debt has to be paid, which according to them means I have to pay at least £60 a month and I just don't have it at this time:sad:

 

Does anyone know where I stand legally? That they have refused to accept my payment of £30 a month.

I appreciate this debt is of my own doing but I'm doing my level best to pull myself out of it.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

YOU dictate how much you CAN afford. No-one else has that right. If you have worked out your I & E no one is entitled to view this information but you, and YOU tell them what you can afford.

 

Most people on CAG advise against speaking with these types on the telephone because they lie, threated and badger you into such a state you believe what they are saying. If they telephone at all do not answer their security questions and tell them in writing only.

 

You say they have refulsed to accept £30 a month, do you have this in writing, if so keep that in a safe place.

 

Tell them you will be setting up a Standing Order (do NOT give them any of your banking details). Make the amount what YOU can safely afford and no more. If you are on Jobseekpers or any Benefits a Judge would normally set this at around £1 per month.

 

How old is your Vanquis account? as there is another avenue we could go down too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you sooooo much for replying it's a weight off my shoulders just to talk to someone about it.

The debt is about a year old.

I paid them £20 over the phone today and am supposed to ring tomorrow (as it's payday) to pay a further £30.

The lady I spoke to said I had to fill in a form detailing all my income and outgoings, provide wage slips etc so the solicitors could go over it and deicide how much THEY thought I could pay.

 

I've just been reading some previous threads and think I've done everything wrong already:oops:

They kept phoning me at work, so to stop that happening I phoned them today. They insist they sent me a letter but I have recieved NO letter from them.

Should I pay tomorrow? Especially as I do owe the money.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do NOT have to fill in an I&E form. Only a court can order that.

 

Send the harassment letter from the letters templates. That should stop the phone calls.

 

These people are annoying. You clearly want to pay, and have made an excellent offer. However, their greed means I am keen to make them suffer... they are not treating you fairly or seriously.

 

When did you take this card out? Might there be any charges on the account, or PPI? I feel a CCA request coming on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

it puzzled me why they are offering a discount

 

typically this only happens when there is a known issue with the CCA being faulty and un-en

or the balance is made of mainly unlawful charges & PPI.

 

you are under NO legal obligation to negotiate over the phone.

 

and to be perfectly honest, if you gave them card details, i'd phone your bank and tell them you have damaged your card and it will no longer work.

 

these muppets will fleece you blind so be careful.

 

stop talking to them on the phone and remember they have

 

NO LEGAL POWERS to do anything to you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of the £600 owing now the origianl debt was £250 the rest are overlimit or late charges! However I went overlimit because they charged a late charge!

 

Can't remember the exact date I took it out but think 2008. So do I ring a pay them tomorrow?

Seriously guys I can't tell you what a relief it is to talk to people about it :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont' have statements to hand but know my limit was only £250 which I never went over until the late charges...................so a rough estimate would be £600 less £250 is £350 of charges! Plus 8% is £380 leaving £220. I didn't have PPI I still can't believe I was stupid enough to get in this much debt over £250!

 

Do I carry on paying them as I said I would? Although this was only agreed by 1st credit until I submitted my I&E which I won't do now. I'm not sure where to go from here

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been rooting around in my paperwork.

 

I took the card out in October 2006 - much longer than I thought.

 

My latest statement shows a repayment option plan of £6.95.

Does this change the CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

look in the library top left tab

 

cca 1st credit

 

sar to the oc vanquish

 

use postal orders

 

you can leave the £1 blank

 

p'haps put vanquish on the sar one

 

dont sign the letters

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

I'm just sorting my letters to send to Vanquis and 1st credit.

 

I've found the CCA template but can't seem to find a SAR one, I'm sure it's a case of not seeing it for looking but if someone could post me a link to it I'd be grateful.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?417-A-Subject-Access-Request-for

 

remember to edit depending on who you are sending to DCA or OC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received two letters from 1st credit. One saying I owe money pay now - which they said last Thursday has already been sent out but letter is dated 11th November.

The second was is dated 12th November the day after I spoke to them.

It has a "Financial Statement" that I'm supposed to fill in with all supporting documents., I assume that I ignore all this?

I'm a bit concerned about ignoring it as on the phone I offered £30 a month which I was told was unacceptable but in the letter they have agreed to it on an interm basis until I send back form.

 

Would I be better off to continue to pay £30 a month until they provide me my CCA which I sent recorded delivery on Fri 12th or withhold payment?

 

I'm confuddled!:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore their stupid text.

 

If they call again refuse to answer their security questions, tell then you are concered about identity theft, tell them in writing only and put the phone down.

Do this every time they ring, they will soon get cheesed off

Do not enter into any conversation with them on the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks :-)

 

They phoned a second time at about 6pm, I wouldn't confirm who I was or gave any details, just asked them in future to communicate in writing only..........then I hung up which perversely was highly satsifying!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...