Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

WF Interest rates


rcl
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4908 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took an unsecured loa out with welcome finance, which is almost paid up (finishes in Feb 2011)

 

I recently asked for a statement showing the balance of the loan

 

Head office sent me a statement showing one figure, with one interest rate

local branch also sent me a statement, however, this shows a different balance outstanding (by about £100) and another interest rate

 

Both interest rates differ from the one on the CCA form I signed

 

Also, when I look back thru my paperwork, Welcome sent me two forms, one with PPI on it, and one without PPI on it.

 

We signed the one with NO PPI, and this is the loan we took out, However, whilst looking at their paperwork this morning it seems if I had taken the loan with PPI, they would have offered me a lower interest rate on the loan

 

Should I just see what they come back with in relation to my letter querying the difference in interest rates and settlement figures, ?

 

Is it worth me complaining about getting a better interest rate if I had taken the PPI ?

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

These interest rates are a shocker !!!

 

on the agreement i signed, no PPI, it states £3000 borrowed (with a £75 acceptance fee and MIF!) over 24 months £187.49 APR 51.71% Rate of Interest Per Annum 47.64 %

 

on the agreement I didnt sign, with PPI, it states £3000 loan, personal accident £195.00, PPI £715.55 Acceptance feeand MIF £75.00 over 24 months £24301 APR 50.76%, Rate of Interest per Annum 47.64%

 

on the recent statement Credit £3075.00 Annual interest rate 39.60% MINIMUM duration of greement 24 months

 

Does anyone know what MIF is ?

 

The statement is also showing a fee assessment has been added each month. Only £1.22 or 85p, small amounts, but no idea what this is !!

 

Also notices that welcome have signed the credit agreement 21 days after we did !!

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at this. I don`t know if this has been updated at all. It is the OFT`s Giudance on Discounted APR`s and PPI, from 2000 so may be a bit too pld.

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/reports/consumer_credit/oft299.pdf

 

MIF as been the subject of much discussion on this forum for a very long time. My understanding is that it is an insurance that the loan company take out against you defaulting. Some people seem to believe it should only be in use on loans over £25,000. BUT I do remember a statement from a Financial Adviser(or something of that ilk), somewhere on CAG, don`t ask me where, saying that MIF could officially be used on any size loan, but it would be VERY unusual and a waste of time really for it to used on a small amount. So you can guarantee if that is the case the only reason these **** would have it on any agreement would be for their own benefit and not the customers.

 

Does any body know what the fee assessment is for? I have asked this before and never had a definitive answer. APR`s and such are really way out of most peoples understanding I`m afraid. Hopefully the link above will help. Or some one will be along soon my friend, I`m sure.

 

Cheers, Mark

 

May be not a lot of help at all here, but it will bump your thread for further and better people to have a look at this for you.

Edited by mark1arby
additional info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

MIF, is a mortgage indemnity fee, and in my opinion should not be added to an unsecured loan!!!

I would suggest you send off for a Dsar asap.

ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE

either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s,

of the investigating & prosecuting organisations: DONOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen.

 

1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633

2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia(MD) for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643

3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955

 

4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108

(part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders

 

5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company lawyer) : @ 0207 637 6231

__________________

File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/complaintformcib.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

MIF, is a mortgage indemnity fee, and in my opinion should not be added to an unsecured loan!!!

I would suggest you send off for a Dsar asap.

 

Brassed I agree totally about the MIF. It is just another tool for getting more out of the customer. If it is an insurance to benifit the creditor, why are we as the customer paying for it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mark for the link and the advice, Ive printed off the OFT sheets and am sure I will be quoting some of that to them in my complaint

 

Thanks too brassed off, do you mean i should SAR them ? I already have my contract and statements. do i need anything else ?

 

 

Guys, I tried to click your scales for helping me, to add to your rep, and they seem to have disappeared, but thanks anyway !

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to write another letter of complaint to welcome. Ive already written one on harassment from local branch when i had to cancel my direct debit in september as my bank card had been cloned

 

The new complaint will be based on

 

1. £75.00 accepatance fee and MIF being added to the loan amount

2. Interest added to the £75 MIF/acceptance fee

3. Communication from local branch during my last complaint

4. Charges being added to my account whlilst the complaint was being dealt with

5. Fee assessment charges being added to the account

6. Default notice issued by local branch while account was in dispute, despite me telling them my bank card had been cloned, and also that the account was in dispute

7. The amount of charges being added to the account

8. Two statements, same date, one from head office, one from local branch, have different totals

9. APR differs from contract and statement

10. At time the contract was signed, APR offered was lower if i took PPI

Any advice I give, is given with the best intention of helping. I am not legally trained, so it is probably best to just ignore me;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...