Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Samsung Re-occuring Fault


Matty_Ward
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4906 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Im Matty, I am a serial moaner and many directors have suffered my wrath.

 

Just got a little query on the following issue.

 

I have a laptop, little over 2 years old from Argos. Around 10 months ago the charging socket in the rear of the machine started to smoke and filled up the room in little time. Although out of warranty, as this was a product liability issue, Samsung repaired the machine and returned it to me at no charge. However the fault has now started to re-occur, but after speaking to them they are saying because it has not re-occured within 3 months of repair they are not able to do anything about it.

 

I am aware of the 6 year obligation, and my statutory rights....but am I being unreasonable asking them to replace the unit with one of the same specification as I believe this fault is inherent with this machine and changing the socket again, will just mean a matter of time before it re-occurs.

 

I have pinged off an email to the director of Samsung UK asking for the above to be sorted, and advised that if anything happens to the machine which results in damage to property or injury I will put in a product liability claim to the maximum possible amount.

 

Regards

 

Matty

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay the finance via your credit card, Then contact your card company. If the problem is inherent then they have to repair it within a suitable time for you or replace it with a model of equivalent or higher specs. So yes you are within your rights and no you are definitely not being unreasonable. You have a few years i think, if you can prove to them that the issue is an inherent flaw. Unfortunately its not within Samsung's obligation to resolve this, instead its with the retailer (Argos), in saying that Samsung may resolve it in the interests of PR. Escalate this immediately as high as you can go with argos management and executives. Im having a very similar problem right now with a Sony Vaio melting. Good luck mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

From my experience it will be Mr. Griffiths' secretary or elso it will be forwarded to a customer relations officer with strict instructions to deal with it appropriately. It might take a few days to work its way through the executive ladder, if all else fails, then' email blanket' (CC) all executives you can find with the same email, then it wont be ignored mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I would update you, I had a reply from a young man at Samsung who is going to give me my money back 8-)

 

As soon as he gets proof of purchase back and the laptop, they will be sending me a refund for £599.99.

 

Fantastic service samsung, I may even buy another Samsung laptop 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:whoo: Congrats mate, Make sure you keep a copy of your receipt/ finance agreement and proof of sending the laptop just encase. Oh and take a quick snap of the laptop as proof of its condition prior to transportation if you can. You got sweet news, but keep yourself covered/ backed-up for all outcomes. I did all that with Sony and they've just agreed today to replace my vaio. But you've obviously made all the right moves, now Samsung will probably just be happy to get this dealt with and to wipe the whole issue clean, for PR issues. Sounds like they are dealing with it proficiently. Hope its smooth sailing for you here-on in mate :wink:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...