Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming back "PPI" from Vanquis


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I made a number of PPI claims but I only do that when I can calculate the complete redress as stated by the FOS:

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi/redress.html

 

I made a SAR to Vanquis a while ago so that I can have the statements and Credit Agreement (some companies issued PPI even when I didn't tick the box). They responded with an incomplete response. After been left on the back burner for a couple on months I decided to phone them and asked why they didn't send all the information. Their response:

 

"They do not have to provide me with the signed copy of the Credit Agreement (or any copy) when making a SAR, the only time they have to provide a signed copy of the agreement is when they take you to court"

 

I disagree, a credit Agreement is personal data and the signed copy is personal data of me they are holding. Can somebody shed some light on it?

 

"They do not have to provide statements, they can provide copy statements on request and this cost £5 per statement according to the credit agreement."

 

I believe statements is not personal data but the printouts they provided me with only contains very limited information about the history of the account, not nearly enough to even calculate the PPI premiums. All other CC provided statements and I do not see why I have to pay that much information regarding the history of the account. Any ideas?

 

"I can claim the PPI (Repayment Option Plan as they call it, still PPI) and they will investigate it by listening to the recording of the phone conversation when it was sold. If I am unhappy with their decision I can request a copy of the recording."

 

Well, isn't such a recording personal information? If I can request it after the complaint, certainly they have to send it with a SAR? Anyone can comment on it? I need that information to be able to proper construct my complaint and not to make statements that could be untrue because I could not remember the details.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiger,

 

I believe you are correct and entitled to a copy of your agreement and all other information they hold about you including all statements, when you submit a SAR.

 

As I see it you now have two choices:

 

1) Write back to Vanquis and remind them of their obligation to provide the requested information. In my personal opinion, a complete waste of time.

 

2) Contact the Information Comissioners Office, asking them to investigate your complaint and force Vanquis to provide the information.

 

Might be worth calling the ICO first and enquire about what they advise.

 

Website is http://www.ico.gov.uk/

 

Good luck

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tiger,

 

I believe you are correct and entitled to a copy of your agreement and all other information they hold about you including all statements, when you submit a SAR.

 

As I see it you now have two choices:

 

1) Write back to Vanquis and remind them of their obligation to provide the requested information. In my personal opinion, a complete waste of time.

 

2) Contact the Information Comissioners Office, asking them to investigate your complaint and force Vanquis to provide the information.

 

Might be worth calling the ICO first and enquire about what they advise.

 

Website is http://www.ico.gov.uk/

 

Good luck

 

DJ

 

I agree with your assessment but the main thing for me is time. I was thinking of phoning the ICO today and see what they say, unsure whether I will get a traight answer. I think a should make a formal complaint anyway, just to ensure they din't get off the hook.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my personal experience Tiger, it is worth giving the ICO a call and discussing your case with them before submitting a formal complaint.

 

They will be in a better position to advise you on the best way forward.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my personal experience Tiger, it is worth giving the ICO a call and discussing your case with them before submitting a formal complaint.

 

They will be in a better position to advise you on the best way forward.

 

DJ

 

I spoke to them today but the guy didn't sound to be too informed but we discussed the issues and he basically agree with me that the signed credit agreement is personal data. Regarding the issue of statements: They are not personal data but all the transactions on the account are. If they do not provide you with statements then they have to provide the data in another form and sending statements is the easiest. That is the way I see it and he basically agreed. Also the phone conversation is personal data and should be supplied.

 

I did send a letter to Vanquis today, whether it will be a waste of time I will find out. The impression that I received when speaking to them is similar when I had discussions about account redressing after a PPI refund with other cc companies. The banks created protocols how this should be done and the people you speak to just follow these protocols, they cannot do anything outside of it and they do not have the power, therefore you have to speak or communicate with someone much higher up the food chain.

 

I made this fact clear in the letter that someone senior should deal with it, whether that will work is any ones guest. I did tried a trick in the letter though. I spelled it out to them in the letter the reasons why I require the info and it is to claim back the "PPI" and that I need the info to calculate the proper account redress. I tried it to good effect before and maybe they will start the PPI complaint and I will get the recording, should they decline it then by that time I will probably have everything I need and can then start the claim again or refer it to the FOS, but with the correct info to my disposal. I can built my case around what has been said in the sales conversation. They cannot ask why didn't I said the things in the original claim because I didn't made a claim.

 

I will wait and see what come of it.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...