Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSL sending all manner of threats on old Joint Bank Account debt


pinkrat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi :-) its been a while since i've been on here but i'm looking for some advice.

 

My partner has received a letter in his and his estranged wifes name from Credit Security Ltd.

 

Looks like a debt from Lloyds bank bought by them.

 

My partner says the debt is from a joint account from about 5 years ago.

 

The letter just says that they understand that he now is residing at the above address, mine,

and to contact them to discuss the account asap.

 

If someone has any advice on what to do i would be very grateful,

 

thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds like they are not sure he is residing at your address and they are phising to find out! In my opinion ignore it and don't give them the information they need to confirm their suspicions.

 

Regards

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner and his estranged wives house was recently sold after being repossessed and

 

a company acting on behalf of Lloyds called Eversheds traced my partner to my address as they had money left to divide.

 

This was true and the money will soon be received.

 

Do you think the Credit security got my address from Eversheds.

 

If so, should we still ignore for now?

 

The letter is addressed to my partner and his wife but obviously she doesn't live here :)

 

but the invoice on the bottom of the letter is only in my parners name.

 

There is no demand for any payment,

just to get in contact with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally would still ignore until they send something more substantial.

 

You don't need to do their work for them,

 

at the moment they are probably only trying to trace both parties to this.

 

What type of account are they chasing for Lloyds,

as you mention 5 years,

in which case it may well be SB soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems my partner left finances up to his wife and he's not sure what the debt is.

 

Maybe its an overdraft or something.

 

Its not a loan,

 

its debt developed from a joint bank account.

 

Also what does SB mean?

 

Thanks for your advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb means statute barred

 

they are just phishing to see if the can con you into paying before it gets time barred

 

ignore them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning all,

 

just got home to discover 2nd letter for addressed to my partner and his estranged wife.

 

Its quite blunt,

 

no dear sir or madam :-)

 

It says in capitals

 

Please take note, you have ignored previous communication, you have had the benefit of goods/services supplied for which you have not paid,

unless we hear from you within 7 days with a payment and repayment proposal we may without further notice

 

(1) Instruct one our our local collectors to call upon you for payment

 

(2) Proceed with legal action for recovery through Aylesbury County Court

 

It is in your own interest to make an arrangement for settlement now by completing the portion below and returning the entire letter to this office.

 

So what do you think we should do now,

 

i'm quite annoyed a company is writing to my address to a couple who only one half live here, this is my house.

 

I feel like writing to them myself and telling them where to get off.

 

The debit is joint not just his.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still phishing - ignore again.

 

It is just possible that they 'could' send a doorstep person, but you do not have to open the door to them, tell them you want them to leave (through closed door). Highly unlikely though. Seen the above letter many times before, all 'threats' and best ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

best look up your local police non emerg number

they have as much right to knock at your door as the milkman..bye..hello is that the police... i've..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Afternoon all, received 3rd letter from Credit Security Limited.

 

This time its on pink paper :-)

 

It is noting that their previous correspondance has been ignored and that they are left with only one course of action

which is recovery through county court.

 

However, as a final gesture to resolve the matter,

they are prepared to accept a reduced sum in settlement.

 

They have reduced the debt by £600 if it is paid by 5th december

and then my partners credit reference file will be amended accordingly.

 

The letters seem to be coming pretty regular,

should we still ignore?

Thanks for the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

classic sign that either the debt is mainly unlawful charges or ppi

or

they have no paperwork to back up their fleecing activities.

 

ignore totally

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

depends if thats the soft pink paper or the rough one.

 

ones for the hamster the others for your.........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, me again.

 

Just received 4th letter from Credit Security Limited.

 

It says again that my partner has disregarded numerous requests for settlement

and unless they receive a payment and repayment proposal at their office by noon 23rd dec

a claim will be prepared for issue in the Aylesbury County Court for the debt, interest and an application for costs.

 

Any judgement given will be enforced by the court bailiff.

 

Sounds pretty scary now,

 

what shall we do?

 

Merry christmas all :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to have missed out a couple of steps

- like your partner can ask the judge for time to pay,

and they wouldnt be able to send a Bailiff round,

unless they successfully gain a CCJ

and then your partner would have to not keep up to the payment plan the judge awards...

 

If the letter literally says they will get a CCJ and will put a Bailiff straight on,

that sounds to me a bit like misrepresentation of powers to cause fear.

 

At the end of the day, if it comes to Bailiffs likely to turn up,

 

you can just do a Stat Dec for a tenner at solicitors claiming ownership of all goods in the property so they cannot take anything

- only thing that could be at risk is if he has a car in him name, but those can be hidden ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks foryour reply, my partner has brought nothing but his clothes to my property. Everything in my house is mine and he has no job at the moment. Are my possessions at risk if a bailiff called?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A baliff will not call until and only IF this shower of idiots take him to court and win. These are still just threats at the moment. Sit back and have a very merry Christmas.

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting letters from these also,

 

seemed to have taken a TSB debt from Wescott,

 

also an M&S debt over 2 years old and unenforceable,

 

where have they suddenly appeared from?

 

Have not noticed anybody on CAG mentioning this low life,

 

as I am in Scotland I'll have to see what happens next,

 

TSB were asked for agreement over 18 months ago and didn't produce,

 

M&S is for old storecard converted to Credit Card,

 

my thread is under Other Institutions M&S.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...