Jump to content
Kicking-Us-Off-ESA

incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3564 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Might be of interest to some

Musculoskeletal disorders are among the most common causes of sickness absence, long-term incapacity for work and ill-health retirement. The number of Incapacity Benefit (IB) recipients in the United Kingdom has trebled since 1979,

 

See full story.

http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/content/77-78/1/55.full

 

 

another edit from the full story...

 

Pathways to work

 

The Pathways to work pilots run by the UK Department for Work and Pensions [1] are based on and provide a test of the biopsychosocial approach described here. Pathways is an integrated package of support specifically designed to help IB recipients manage their health problems and get back to work. It is particularly appropriate for non-specific musculoskeletal conditions (and common mental health problems—which often coexist). Over 58,000 people took part in the pilots, and Pathways is now being rolled out to one-third of the United Kingdom. Early outcomes show much higher take-up rates than expected and an 8–10% increase in return to work rates, which is much better than any such social security initiative has ever achieved worldwide

Conclusion

 

Some people with musculoskeletal pathology will always require specialist treatment and rehabilitation, but most non-specific musculoskeletal conditions are, and should be, managed in primary care and the workplace. The challenge then is to incorporate basic rehabilitation principles into clinical and occupational management. Randomised controlled trials(RCTs) of clinical guidelines and biopsychosocial rehabilitation for low back pain show how management can be improved and how that can lead to better clinical and occupational outcomes. The number of people on IB in the United Kingdom increased 3-fold within a generation, for no good biological reason, and there is no biological reason that could not be reversed. The Pathways pilots and the 42% reduction in new awards of IB for low back pain show what can be achieved. The UK government’s stated target is to reduce the number of people on IB by 1 million. We could reduce sickness absence and the number of people who go on to long-term incapacity by at least one-third to one-half and in principle by much more (fully recognizing the practical problems of delivering that vision). To achieve this, however, depends on getting all stakeholders onside and a fundamental shift in the culture of how we think about and manage non-specific musculoskeletal conditions—in health care, in the workplace and in society.

 

You might see this on your connsultants or dr's reports.

Waddell's signs

Here's what that means.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waddell%27s_signs

Edited by Kicking-Us-Off-ESA
Added exra info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a musculoskeletal disorder, had it for years. The waddells signs are always mentioned as being looked at in my occupational health reports at work. They've never been able to find waddles signs but still, they look for them every time!


My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...