Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This morning an "enforcement officer"/bailiff from Marston group knocked on my door wanting to speak to my wife. He told me that she owed 403.71 but could not speak to me so left a letter for her. Naturally I opened it as soon as he left and was staggered to see a financial breakdown.

 

3/10/10 Pre-enforcment letter 11.20 +VAT (Never received)

1/11/10 09:50 1st visit/attendance to levy 54.94 +VAT

1/11/10 09:50 Attendace to remove goods 120+VAT

 

The original fine was from the congestion charge and was £185 - We had just completely forgotten to sort it as my wife has only just had a baby and my mother has been in hospital with terminal cancer.

 

There is also another piece of paper with a different breakdown of fees:

 

PCN £185

Admin Fees £77.71

attendance costs £141

Total Due 403.71

 

This is all very confusing and seems SO excessive - especially since my wife never received a letter from marston group. At first I thought this was a hoax or [problem] as the costs are so ludicrous.

 

Any help would be much appreciated

 

Thanks

 

Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - There is no notice of seizure - and there is no way I would let him take anything!

 

Are these just empty threats - has he got the right to take anything? What a sad, demoralising world we live in where an £8 congestion zone bill can be distorted into a £403 bill

 

My wife spoke to him as he left his mobile number on the piece of paper - he said he would only accept payment in full - and when questioned about the fact we never received the letter he just side stepped the matter by asking how we were going to pay and he would give us time.

 

Is it worth speaking to the london congestion zone people? Shall I get my solicitor involved - is what they are doing legal?

 

How come the first visit/attendance to levy was charged at 54.94+VAT but the attendance to remove goods was charged at 120+VAT - surely they should visit first?? Do they have any regulations they have to stick to? Especially as we did not receive the letter .

 

Thanks again

 

Will

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, contact the congestion zone people and ask about putting in an appeal. Out of interest did you know that 80% of the warrants handled by this company are incorrect.... that is why they do not like you seeing them.

 

If the warrant is in initials and surname only it is invalid.... it needs to be in your full name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick response

 

Transport for London are no use at all - they said it was out of their hands at that the bailiffs charges were uncapped!!!! Marstons say I need to write to their "customer care team" - for the warrant and also to dispute the ridiculous fees.

 

Whilst speaking to the girl at marstons she also confirmed to me that the letter was sent by 2nd class post?!

 

W

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick response

 

Transport for London are no use at all - they said it was out of their hands at that the bailiffs charges were uncapped!!!! Marstons say I need to write to their "customer care team" - for the warrant and also to dispute the ridiculous fees.

 

Whilst speaking to the girl at marstons she also confirmed to me that the letter was sent by 2nd class post?!

 

W

 

Your wife should have received a Notice to Owner, Charge Certificate and Order for Recovery BEFORE the debt is passed to a bailiff.

 

If none of these documents had been received then it would appear that there has been a problem with the address. This could be due to moving premises, having an odd address or errors at DVLA.

 

What you need to do is call the Traffic Enforcement Centre on 08457 045 007 (wait on the line to speak with an operator) and ask them to confrim to you the address on the warrant. They will then email a copy of an Out of Time Application.

 

This will CEASE all enforcement until the matter has been determined.

 

On the matter of the fees, as far as I am concerned, the bailiff should NOT be charging an ATTENDING TO REMOVE fee at a first visit!!!

 

Also, how can they possibly justify such a fee UNLESS they know in advance that there is anything to remove !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tomtubby thanks for taking a look so quickly

 

Currently trying to call them - have been on hold for 15mins! Will let you know the outcome.....

 

I agree about the fees, the only issue is there doesn't seem to be any regulating body. I spoke to the bailiff on the number he gave and he couldn't have been more unhelpful, he said that was the amount, he was allowed to charge the removal of goods fee under the contract guidelines between Marston and TFL and unless I paid there would be subsequent visits/charges.

 

W

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...