Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4811 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i dunno

i think it is harrassment from day one

 

there is no legal precedence that they can demand monies from anyone.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i didn't specifically know that, well found zb

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,ive just received my 4th letter in as many months claiming infringement of copyrite, the first saying i had to pay 1,200 or court proceedings as was the 2nd. The 3rd letter said i had to pay 3,000 pounds so i sent a LOD recorded delivery which they sent the 4th letter saying they had not recieved any explanation of my innocence, which i find strange because the mail service has a date time and signature of my LOD, but never the less they have offered me a one off 21 day trail offer of 400 pounds to resolve this matter, which i thought was very nice of them to lower the price (NOT).

:mad2::mad2::mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,ive just received my 4th letter in as many months claiming infringement of copyrite, the first saying i had to pay 1,200 or court proceedings as was the 2nd. The 3rd letter said i had to pay 3,000 pounds so i sent a LOD recorded delivery which they sent the 4th letter saying they had not recieved any explanation of my innocence, which i find strange because the mail service has a date time and signature of my LOD, but never the less they have offered me a one off 21 day trail offer of 400 pounds to resolve this matter, which i thought was very nice of them to lower the price (NOT).

:mad2::mad2::mad2:

 

I wouldn't do anything with it. If it contains no further evidence supporting their claim then they can bluster as much as they like. It is not for you to provide evidence of your innocence, but for them to prove your guilt. The more you respond, the more likely you are to build your own gallows. In your shoes I'd wait for the court date, that'll never appear.

 

I am due to go on holiday soon and I am worried I will get a letter or a court issue one and I can't respond

 

If you're so worried just keep a copy of your travel documents/ticket stubs etc. and appeal on your return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Zoomboy,i think im gonna wait and see what happens instead of keep trying to prove my innocence they clearly not listening to anyone. I think the more you respond to them the more threatening letters you get. A friend of mine who lives a mile away recieved exactly the same letter for the exact same title as me but did nothing and has not recieved any other letters....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx Zoomboy,i think im gonna wait and see what happens instead of keep trying to prove my innocence they clearly not listening to anyone. I think the more you respond to them the more threatening letters you get. A friend of mine who lives a mile away recieved exactly the same letter for the exact same title as me but did nothing and has not recieved any other letters....

 

Exactly, if you do respond to these muppets it has to be in a forceful manner or they have you down as a potential target worth wasting a bit of postage on. I’ve not heard anymore after sending just one LOD, although the way it was worded left them in no doubt they’d be getting sod all without a court judgement in their favour. Crossley is nothing more than a playground bully seeking out the weak and vulnerable to target. But as with all bullies (or in his case Coward) they run a mile when faced with those who stand up to them.

 

Don’t worry though, given his apparent state of health following previous misdemeanours, I’m sure it won’t be too long before we’re p i ssing on his grave!! Although from what I've read his wife will be first in the queue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd save my urine for the more worthy. I plan on dropping a few solids myself :)

 

I don't really wish anyone dead. I do believe in what goes around, comes around, call it karmic justice if you will. But one day all those profiting from this practice will get what's coming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff, it should be noted that getting default judgements (if the defendant doesnt reply) is normally quite simple. In fact i recently got one against my landlord, he had replied but put the wrong case number on all correspondence, the judgement was later set aside but that didnt really surprise me.

 

As mentioned on one of the above links, it is very pleasing that the claims were thrown out at such an early stage and that they were full of errors.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Davenport Lyons are having a hearing with the SRA in March, so ACS Law may be a year away.

http://www.legalsupportnetwork.co.uk/index.php/news/details/sra_says_davenport_lyons_lawyers_knowingly_targeted_innocent_web_users_in_a/

 

It also looks like ACS may have problems if they are fined for Data Protection, if the gravy train has dried up.

 

Does anyone know what has happened to the ACS website?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Davenport Lyons are having a hearing with the SRA in March, so ACS Law may be a year away.

http://www.legalsupportnetwork.co.uk/index.php/news/details/sra_says_davenport_lyons_lawyers_knowingly_targeted_innocent_web_users_in_a/

 

It also looks like ACS may have problems if they are fined for Data Protection, if the gravy train has dried up.

 

Does anyone know what has happened to the ACS website?

 

The ACS 'leak' not only broke various DPA laws but it suddenly bought the whole issue to major attention, the last court application by Gallant Macmillan I think ran into serious problems.

 

I think ACS have decided not to put up a website, there were some simple 'draft' verison up a while back (featuring mountain background) but they appeared to have disappeared now too.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found Crossley's (or one of his) websites. http://www.wal-sca.com/home a bit of a skeleton though. Strange the only thing he has apart from his address is a link to the SRA!

 

Aha..Yes..The 'backwards' one..If you say ACS LAW backwards 3 times at midnight, Andrew Crossley appears..and starts crying about his failed business :)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just read through what the judge said and it seems that ACS-Law did an appalling job for their client, missing info, incomplete submissions etc. You would have thought that at least AC could have got this bit right, as a solicitor supposedly specialising in this field.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Whoops, seems like ACS Law are no longer involved in harrassing innocent people, Andrew Crossley is concentrating on his other customers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12275913

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?291530-ACS-Law-ACS-Law-withdraw-from-ALL-cases-BBC-NEWS

 

dx

siteteam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...