Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • honeybee13
      Should we trust Sunak or the next PM to fix the Country's problems? (title revised 24/10/22)

      By honeybee13 · Posted

      Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Crazy Lou
      Dangerous non complete install Bt left us terminating our contract asking us £545 we haven’t terminated non one wil talk

      By Crazy Lou · Posted

      Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • Kyosanto
      Ryanair are delaying paying out the compensation for a delayed flight

      By Kyosanto · Posted

      There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • NewsBot
      Coach: US sues to block its parent merger with Michael Kors owner

      By NewsBot · Posted

      The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • dx100uk
      Lowell Claimform - Old Vanquis Card Debt - poss SB, - now N244 for SJ

      By dx100uk · Posted

      thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Advice on Moorcroft Debt Recovery (part v)

Blueymoon

By Blueymoon
in Debt Collection Agencies

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Blueymoon

Blueymoon

Posted
Posted

I have a debt with the Halifax which Moorcrof have latched onto. I have sent them the CCA letter. and they have replied saying that

"Certain accounts are excluded from compliance with part V of the consumer credit act or not in fact credit or hire agreements and we believe that our clients account falls into one of these catagories. We therefore require imediate payment of the sum outstanding or alternatavely your clients realistic proposals for repayment of the same".

Can anyone help me with this one

Link to post
Share on other sites
silverfox1961

silverfox1961

Posted
Posted

Hi, Got your PM

I have moved your post to it's own thread so that you don't get lost on someone elses.

 

Am I right in thinking this is an overdraft?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted

Just a question, really, the answer may be obvious to everyone else but ... What do they mean this:

or alternatavely your clients realistic proposals for repayment of the same".

Are you acting on behalf of someone else, then? Or is it that the administration is so crap at Moorcroft they not only don't know what time of the day it is most of the time or that their letter writing is so bad now they have to refer/reply to everything in the third party? Or just they don't employ people with much brain matter?
Link to post
Share on other sites
jack russel joe

jack russel joe

Posted
Posted
I have a debt with the Halifax which Moorcrof have latched onto. I have sent them the CCA letter. and they have replied saying that

"Certain accounts are excluded from compliance with part V of the consumer credit act or not in fact credit or hire agreements and we believe that our clients account falls into one of these catagories. We therefore require imediate payment of the sum outstanding or alternatavely your clients realistic proposals for repayment of the same".

Can anyone help me with this one

 

hi the halifax robbed me with thier overdraght charges, and moorcrp sent a letter to me asking for money, i sent them a letter back saying i will not pay you, but will indeed offer to pay the halifax £1 every week. if they refues then they can take me to court.

 

so i can tell the mr judge i was only £50 over drawen now they want £900? i am really fed up of these charges

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted
but will indeed offer to pay the halifax £1 every week. if they refues then they can take me to court.

 

Moorcroft, court? Excuse me whilst I throw up. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted

BTW, Mr Russell, but Moorcroft can't take you to court, not unless they own the debt. Like I said, Moorcroft and court; excuse me whilst I throw up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted (edited)

Oh, and BTW, but I just so happen to have a Halifax debt with Moorcroft right now. What a surprise.

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites
jack russel joe

jack russel joe

Posted
Posted
BTW, Mr Russell, but Moorcroft can't take you to court, not unless they own the debt. Like I said, Moorcroft and court; excuse me whilst I throw up.

 

hi mr cartaphilus, i do not think that moorcroft own the debt , they only send a letter" pre" court division on behalf of the halifax.

i have hade lots of court papers berfoe from the judges that wear the red coat,

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted

They still wear red coats?

but Moorcroft can't take you to court, not unless they own the debt. Like I said, Moorcroft and court; excuse me whilst I throw up.

 

By that, I mean any action they threaten you with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
silverfox1961

silverfox1961

Posted
Posted

An overdraft is not generally covered by a CCA request (part v exemption) but they still should send you something to show you actually had an overdraft facility

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted
hi mr cartaphilus, i do not think that moorcroft own the debt , they only send a letter" pre" court division on behalf of the

link3.gif

.

i have hade lots of court papers berfoe from the judges that wear the red coat,

 

Their pre-court division is on a level with a flying spaghetti monster. Doesn't exist. As to judges, red coats. Last one I saw wore perfectly ordinary every day clothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
rhos123

rhos123

Posted
Posted
hi mr cartaphilus, i do not think that moorcroft own the debt , they only send a letter" pre" court division on behalf of the halifax.

i have hade lots of court papers berfoe from the judges that wear the red coat,

 

hi, you mention in your post to judges that wear THE RED COAT these are indeed judges in the crown court, now county court and crown court is indeed a diffrent matter!

Link to post
Share on other sites
rhos123

rhos123

Posted
Posted
Their pre-court division is on a level with a flying spaghetti monster. Doesn't exist. As to judges, red coats. Last one I saw wore perfectly ordinary every day clothing.

 

ah a judge with a red hoody , jeans , and a tie.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted

If you say so. Turning up like that wearing cargo pants, Republic gear. Skateboard out the back. Perhaps they felt the court needed a bit of a fashion lift.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cartaphilus

Guest Cartaphilus

Posted
Posted
INDEED , as it would only be a county court hearing the judge may indeed be

wearing cargo pants.

 

As it was the most catestrophic error I have ever made, the county court judge wore a plain suit, the claimants solicitor a cheap looking one. It was to save someone's house repossession which was successful but only with my help. My payment for all that? Being almost made homeless, life long debt and being betrayed. You may ask yourself why I try to give so much of myself to others when to some it would put them off for life being through all that. That's a question I ask myself every day.

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...