Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help re: Lewis Group/Cohen and Co.


mrdavid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, after seeing some info here and recieving a letter from the lewis group 2 weeks ago, on the 19th I sent by recorded delivery a letter (found here I believe) and a postal order for 1 pound requesting a copy of the CCA, this was delivered on the 20th. however today I've just recieved a follow up letter from Howard Cohen and company dated 21st, I'm I correct in assuming that since I'd submitted a CCA request this should not have happened?

 

would be greatful for any advise as to what my next course of action should be, many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, after seeing some info here and recieving a letter from the lewis group 2 weeks ago, on the 19th I sent by recorded delivery a letter (found here I believe) and a postal order for 1 pound requesting a copy of the CCA, this was delivered on the 20th. however today I've just recieved a follow up letter from Howard Cohen and company dated 21st, I'm I correct in assuming that since I'd submitted a CCA request this should not have happened?

 

would be greatful for any advise as to what my next course of action should be, many thanks in advance.

 

When you say delivered on the 20th - do you mean that is the day you sent it or they received it?

 

If so it could just be a cross over in the post - or if they did would depend on time it was received and processed etc.

 

Would not worry to much about it as yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say delivered on the 20th - do you mean that is the day you sent it or they received it?

 

If so it could just be a cross over in the post - or if they did would depend on time it was received and processed etc.

 

Would not worry to much about it as yet.

 

it was posted on the 19th and they recieved it on the 20th.

 

I wouldn't say I was worried so much as curious as what I should be doing next (i've never got involved in all this before, previously I have ignored things...) and wonder if the fact that they have written to me since without acting on my request is a no-no on their part.

they've given me till thursday 28th to pay the lewis group

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a no no on their part - but i would suggest the small time scale between them receiving the request and sending out this letter - could just be caused by a cross over in the post/or process.

 

If on the other hand they send you one between now and you receving a reply to your CCA request - thats a different matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I gathered that from things I've read on here. I also found it slightly odd that a solicitors company wrote to me with their address put down as a PO Box as though they were sellling pornos in the back of the daily sport.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Maybe they are, but TBH I wouldn't know. But PO Boxes are more than a common occurance with 'solicitors' and DCAs. One wonders what they want to hide ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

well from reading that thread thats stickied it'd appear quite a bit to hide actually!

I also find it quite odd that they'd send apparently urgent letters by mailsort (or whatever the current equivalent is that take days to reach me) effectively giving me 3 days to cough up a figure that is greatly in excess of the £65 a week JSA I've been on since august...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Again, that is fairly common across the board.

 

3 days to cough up a figure that is greatly in excess of the £65 a week JSA I've been on since august...

 

Sorry to be blunt here, but do you think they actually care about that? I imagine you already know this, but this industry is very cold, quite outwardly cruel in many instances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, that is fairly common across the board.

 

 

 

Sorry to be blunt here, but do you think they actually care about that? I imagine you already know this, but this industry is very cold, quite outwardly cruel in many instances.

 

yeah of course that doesn't surprise me, I just can't see how anyone in a position where they are getting these sort of letters is suddenly going to be able to find a large sum of money, so they'll go to the courts and assuming their paperwork is in order get what? a couple of quid a week? (is there a set max the courts can order paid if I'm still out of work?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
I just can't see how anyone in a position where they are getting these sort of letters is suddenly going to be able to find a large sum of money, so they'll go to the courts and assuming their paperwork is in order get

 

But would that not presuppose Lewis already know your situation, have you actually told them you are in receipt of JSA and the amount?

 

Best thing here for you to do is forget about any court action ... Await your CCA. You appear to know already a few things about how this all works, if so then you will already know court action is a long way off usually and may not even happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers, thats quite re-assuring. I've only really been looking into it in any detail for the past week and so really have huge gaps in my knowledge about the process and proceedings involved here, something I hope to remedy using the decent info shared by people such as yourself on these forums, so thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
(is there a set max the courts can order paid if I'm still out of work?)

 

£65 - No one can answer that, but generally in your position it could be as less as £1 a week or month. However, like I said, court action may not occur and if it does, generally a long way off. It also depends what year you took your agreement out and how old it is.

 

Best thing to do, as I said, is put it out of your mind until you have been provided with your credit agreement. If they don't provide one ... Then that's an even bigger bonus.

 

If you have a read on this forum, there is a thread about Lewis specifically. You may find it very interesting reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course it depends on what the debt is and how lare the balance is on whether they go straight for court, although knowing Cohen and the Lewis group quite well they tend to bulk out thier court summons like confetti without the decency of any first contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It’s unenforceable while they remain in default of your CCA request. The debt is still there, though.

 

You might like to remind them they are now in default – letter here. Adapt to suit.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?275892-Failure-to-provide-CCA-Template-letter-needed

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it's the Lewis/Cohen clan is it anything to do with Welcome Finance?

 

If so - and you made the agreement in the local branch they may not have a valid agreement as their paperwork is crap - if it's pre 2005 i would also guess it's unenforceable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a letter from them today, it says:

 

"we refer to your recent letter in which you made a request for information uinder section 77-78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for your partner's account listed above.*

 

Please be advised we are not the creditor in this matter. The Creditor is HSBC bank plc and we are merely instructed to act on their behalf to recover any outstanding balance due.

 

The statutory obligation to provide this information remains with the creditor and we therefore refund your £1 fee and suggest your submit your request to them directly.

 

We trust this clarifies our position.

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Lewis Debt Recovery**

 

 

*this bit is incorrect, I was writing about my own account not a partners

** it has been signed lewis debt recovery, not a persons name.

 

 

anyway. my question is: is this legitimate, do they really not have to supply this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

any advice on what I should do with the £1 postal order they've sent me? and should I send another one with my follow up letter, or does the fact that they have acknowledged that I sent one in the first place make that unnecessary?

 

thanks for all the help everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...