Spending review: Disabled people dread impact of cuts

[Kicking-Us-Off-ESA]

By Heather Sharp BBC News

Anne Novis says she is 'terrified' for her future

Marcus Bradford, 43, left paralysed on his right side by a stroke, says his social life outside his care home will all but end.

Paul Corbett, 56, who is waiting for heart surgery, fears he could lose his home.

Anne Novis, 54, in constant pain from a spinal injury, worries she could lose some of the funding for the carers who wash and dress her.

They are among hundreds of thousands of long-term sick and disabled people likely to feel the effects of Wednesday's spending review, announced as the government tries to tackle the national deficit.

 

 

Benefit reductions, cuts to local authority budgets and continuing reforms of the old incapacity benefits system have left many facing uncertainty.

'Sometimes suicidal'

Marcus relies on £49.50 a week - the "mobility component" of the Disability Living Allowance - to travel beyond the vicinity of his Essex care home.

 

Marcus Bradford worries he would not be able to visit his mother if his mobility allowance was cut

But from October 2012, this will be axed for all care home residents.

He says without it, he will have just £18 a week left over from the benefits that pay for the home, and that barely covers his toiletries and clothing.

He says he won't be able to afford to visit his ailing 75-year-old mother 30 miles away, or to travel eight miles into nearby Clacton-on-Sea.

Some days, he already feels deeply depressed - "sometimes suicidal" - about his condition.

"We won't be able to do anything, we're going to be resigned to staying in the care home, 365 days a year," he says.

The government says care homes should provide for such visits, and that people in residential care will get the financial help they need.

'Savings gone' The spending review also included changes to the Employment and Support Allowance, brought in by Labour to replace incapacity benefit, for people too ill or disabled to work.

A new qualifying test has been introduced. Unless claimants are severely disabled or terminally ill, they are expected to try, with support, to develop their capacity for "work-related activity" and start to look for jobs.

But on Wednesday it was announced that, from April 2012, these claimants will be given a year to find work - after which only the poorest will continue to receive ESA.

It could mean I'll have to give the house up - and then I'll have to ask for social housing, which is basically defeating what the government wants to do!”

End Quote Paul Corbett ESA claimant and former coach driver

Anyone who has not found work, whose partner earns more than £90 a week, or who has more than £16,000 assets, will lose the benefit.

For Paul Corbett, who had to give up his job as a coach driver when he developed heart problems, this would mean losing about £300 a month, though it can be more for some claimants.

Paul's wife is paid £6.58 an hour for working at McDonalds near their home in Talbot Green, Rhondda Cynon Taff, which would push them over the threshold.

After four failed angioplasty operations, he hopes another attempt - or open heart surgery - will eventually get him back to work.

But if he has to wait too long, he fears his ESA will be taken away.

Paul may still be eligible for other benefits, but he has already used up all his savings.

"It could mean I'll have to give the house up - and then I'll have to ask for social housing, which is basically defeating what the government wants to do!"

'Human tragedy' There are 200,000 people on ESA, classed in the "work-related activity group", that the changes are likely to affect.

But another 1.5 million people on incapacity benefit will be re-assessed and transferred to the new system over the next three years.

Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has said the reforms are "not about forcing sick and disabled people who cannot work into employment".

"I've been like this for 20 years, I'm not going to be able to get a job… it's like la la land”

End Quote Anne Novis Former community worker now on disability benefits

He believes nearly one in four people on incapacity benefits are actually fit for work.

Mr Duncan Smith says he wants to end the "human tragedy" of the "lost potential of so many people who have been dumped to languish at the bottom end of society".

But Anne Novis, a former community worker who has fostered 23 children, says she'll feel "sick to the stomach" when the letter arrives inviting her to an assessment of her incapacity benefit status.

She knows of people with disabilities more severe than her spinal condition, who have been considered able to try to seek work.

While she is highly articulate, and can perform tasks like sending e-mails, she says she could do no more than spend an hour or two per day working online or on the phone, from her bed or reclining chair.

"But that won't earn enough to live on," she says.

"I've been like this for 20 years, my condition is deteriorating, I'm not going to be able to get a job… it's like la la land."

 

The government has pledged to "protect the vulnerable"

Disability campaigners say the new tests are flawed, pointing out that 40% of appeals against decisions are upheld.

But the Department for Work and Pensions says it is "unfair to suggest the system isn't working" and points out that only 5% of all cases are overturned, although it has commissioned a review of the test.

Anne also fears a change in her incapacity benefit status would affect other disability benefits which are tied to it.

One of these funds half of the 70 hours a week of personal care on which she relies.

"I am personally terrified for myself," she says. "I feel that I won't have a life, that I would just be a burden on my family."

Social care 'crisis' She also fears for the local authority funding that covers the rest of her care.

David Congdon, head of campaigns and policy at the learning disability charity Mencap, says there is already an "enormous funding crisis" in social care as the population ages.

And local authorities now face 26% cuts to their budgets over the next four years.

The Treasury has transferred an extra £2bn from the health budget, but Mr Congdon says this "won't really bridge the gap".

The government promises to "protect the vulnerable". But many disabled people have serious doubts.

 

Heard it all before PROTECT the poor don't make me laugh..............

[Surfer01]

In essence we cannot blame the current government for imposing such harsh cuts as it was the Labout government that got us into theis mess in the first place, however I do think that the cuts are a bit over the top. I am not sure how it is going ti impact us but then I am over 60 and the wife is 59.

[loan_ranger]

The CSR may well turn out to be "the last straw" catalyst and have the effect of spurring into mass action under a single united banner all the many interested separate groups and sites for the ill, the disabled and their carers.

 

In Thursday's guardian Rhydian James (who is a frequently published feature writer supporting our rights in the guardian and himself disabled) wrote a call to action type article which I recommend. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/oct/21/disability-welfare-cuts-impact

 

Building on the massive response to his article yesterday Rhydian has decided to launch a Disability Rights group - a sort of sister group to carerwatch for disabled people.

 

What do you lot think? I think it's a great idea. Rhydian already writes great articles and if they can get some talking heads for radio and television then at long last disabled people might get some real representation instead of those feeble wet charities who always seem to be on the government side.

Edited October 23, 2010 by loan_ranger
yesterday changed to Thurs

[Kicking-Us-Off-ESA]

Building on the massive response to his article yesterday Rhydian has decided to launch a Disability Rights group - a sort of sister group to carerwatch for disabled people.

 

What do you lot think? I think it's a great idea. Rhydian already writes great articles and if they can get some talking heads for radio and television then at long last disabled people might get some real representation instead of those feeble wet charities who always seem to be on the government side.

 

Hi Lone,

 

I think it's about time to fight back well done to that fella for posting some hope we must move quick in this quest.

[loan_ranger]

Hi Lone,

 

I think it's about time to fight back well done to that fella for posting some hope we must move quick in this quest.

Thanks for your comment. Over the past year I've seen many ppl on the forums setting up yet another web site or FB group (i.e. splintering) when what is really needed is consolidation and a figurehead who has media clout and contacts, I was forlornly hoping for someone famous to come along who could raise our media profile (e.g. like "comely" Ms. Lumley did for the Gurkhas), I think Rhydian might be the one.

I was pleased to note the very many commentators after the article who were offering to come along to street protests, for this is what is needed - we cannot allow ourselves to be simply "brushed under the carpet", which is what has been happening so far for decades with the charities who purport to represent us (e.g. Mind and Disability Alliance "consultations" with HMG regards welfare reform and the introduction of ESA) being in the government's pocket in order to protect their state grants and their own jobs. HMG used these "consultations" to provide a veneer of respectability (i.e. a pretence of "fairness") to some of the most iniquitous laws since the poll tax. We have had our backs pushed against the wall and with the June Spending Review and this month's CSR this has become much worse and blatantly obvious to those affected by the cuts that the con/dems are waging ideologial war against the sick and disabled, therefore it's time we followed the example of the French in order to get the message home to those who are ("by the grace of god") as yet unaffected and tell them that they may one day need some state help and the safety net won't be there for them because their silence allowed this to happen.

They came first for the Communists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

 

Then they came for the trade unionists,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

 

Then they came for the Jews,

and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

 

Then they came for me

and by that time no one was left to speak up.

[babybear39]

The Guardian article is very well written and the comments are mostly in support of the vulnerable groups