Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • To carry on from the above post it may be helpful to go through their WS using their numbers. 9] motorists do NOT accept the contract when entering the land. First they have to read it and understand it and then they realise that a] "No stopping" is prohibitive and cannot offer a contract. b] the signs around the bus stop do not mention who issued the No Stopping signs so it could not have been issued by VCS since the IPC CoP states that their signs should include the IPC logo and the creditor be identified.  10]There is no mention of £100 charge for breaching the No stopping request or if there is it is far too small to read even for a pedestrian. 11] no matter how often VCS say it, it is NOT a contractual clause   22]" the claimant has given the Defendant its contractual licence to enter the site". No it hasn't. This is a road leading to the airport. All sorts of people are going to the airport-travellers, taxis, fuel bowsers, airport staff, companies delivering food and drink for each aircraft, air traffic controllers, buses. It is absolutely ridiculous to attribute VCS wth any sort of permissions. The land owners yes, but not VCS . There can be no sort of analogy between a car park and a major thoroughfare where VCS have no place as it is not relevant land.   23] there can be no contract as there is no offer only a prohibition. And it is not relevant land no matter how Mr Walli attempts to prove otherwise. 25] VCS may have won a few times but none quoted was on an airport covered by the RTA and its own Byelaws. They also have lost more cases than they have won using their prohibitive signs. 26] First one has to consider if there is a contract. Is it relevant land? No. Does a valid contract exist betweer VCS and Peel? NO.  27] the signage at the bus stop may show the conditions ie  no stopping, and restricted zone but not the terms ie is there a charge for stopping and who is the creditor. The last section of the sign is illegible  29] already stated that a WS between VCS and peel is not a valid document 31] it will need more than the Claimants feather to outweigh the case against the Defendant no matter who was driving. 32] there is no law of agency involved. This is not a case of employer/employedd relationship. VCS are muddying the waters because they have no way of transferring the driver's liability to the keeper 33] this a red herring. There is no list of highways at all  on the Highways act 1980 so this is a deliberate strategy to debunk the fact that this road is not relevant land. VCS are put to strict proof that it is relevant land not covered by the Road Traffic Act nor by Byelaws. 34] there ican be no comparison between a railway station and an airport. Totally fatuous analogy.  35] yes the landowners can bring in their own terms but what the cannot do is overrule Byelaws and the Road Traffic Act. 39] surely the paralegal cannot be that ignorant of PoFA. If Bye Laws are involved then the bus stop is not relevant land and so the specious argument about FGW is rubbish   36] what on earth is he talking about with Permits. There is no mention of permits on the signage and even if there were  would it mean that Permit holders were allowed to stop on No Stopping roads? There are enough examples on CAG to counter act their idiocy on continuing charging the extra £60   46] VCS had NO reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA for the Defendants details. No valid  contract with the landowners No stopping is prohibitive therefore cannot form a contract the event happened on a bus stop over which VCS has no jurisdiction the signage either does not show that there was a charge of £100 for stopping, or the font size was too small for a motorist to be able to read it  the signage does not show the Creditor which fails the IPC CoP so not valid the WS contract does not appear to authorise VCS to pursue motorists to Court Given all these factors it seems that VCS have breached the GDPR of the Defendant quite substantially and it would appear right that an exemplary award is made against VCS in the hope that they will drop all further cases at Doncaster airport where they are pursuing motorists on non relevant land.   48] what is this guy on? You weren't in a car park you were on a bus stop 59] this case is totally without merit. I am not surprised that the paralegal will not be turning up. Some statements are pretty close to perjury and others are designed to mislead or misdirect. None of the analogies seem appropriate or relevant. Could have been said in at least half the time without the repetition and trying to make a case where none was there. One particularly bad example of misdirection was in the photographs. The Clearway sign shown near the bus stop is very unclear  unlike the Clearway sign two photos before it which may well include terms and conditions. The one by the bus stop is totally different.      
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote...   your defence doesnt need any return of docs.. carefully read what has been posted here and in the other threads i pointed to in your old thread merged here too.   redwood/harwood or STA or brachers.   just use our enhanced google search box.   uni fees is useful too.   this guy is just in front of you    
    • I have just spent last few hours registering and signing up and filling in all the details.   Below is a POC I have drafted.   The defendant is a parcel delivery company DPD (UK) LIMITED On 09/08/2021 the defendant agreed to deliver the claimant's parcel containing a PlayStation 5 Disc Version value £530, to an address in the UK. The delivery fee of £7.79 was paid by the claimant. Parcel tracking number: ???????? Parcel reference no: ????????? The defendant failed to deliver the parcel and have reported it as lost on 20/08/2021. The defendant refuses to refund the full value of the item and the delivery fee. The claimant seeks £530 being the value of the item, £7.79 delivery cost and legal fees.        (Sorry for being stupid but this POC is supposed to go where it says    " Claim details Why you believe you’re owed the money: " right? Reason why I'm asking is because I don't see anywhere it specifically says what are your particulars of claim)   Tomorrow being the 15th day, I will be ready to click it off (assuming the POC is ok)    I have read a few more hermes/packlink etc stories where they were resolved and gives me hope I will regain my lost money.  Will carry on reading up as much as I can.  
    • You don't submit a defence with the DQ...why are you going over old ground? Just complete the DQ as per my guidelines as posted above and file serve it a few days before 11th Oct.     .
    • Do we use the same defence. My concern is that it should not even be going to small claims court. The debt is for the company TME which had to close down as it could not sustain itself and they are asking my husband to pay for it personally.  There were also 2 other directors involved with the company.                
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Benefit entitlement Review PLZ HELP - im worried i will lose my home!


chedworth98
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi have had so much great advice from here seems more i get more i need , things are comin thick n fast ! ok here goes

 

i was made redundant in april this year after family business went into liquidation , i have huge personal debts from business and i have a mortgage. I was awarded income support in april as i have a 7yr old daughter and i am single parent , i was also awarded smi benefit which is covering mortgage as i had to put it too interest only. I have gone back to college full time to try and get some qualifications !! all was ok but now i have letter saying i need to be assessed because my daughter is 7 ... will i still be entitled to income supprt and smi ? there is no way i can afford mortgage payment without it . i am so frightened they were really horrible in my first interview and i came out in tears ... i have lost my job , my cars been repossessd , im in serious debt and getting brick walls constatntly ... if anybody can give me some advice what i am entitleted to i would really appreciate it xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chedworth98, your smi will continue but you'll have to inform them of your change in circumstances i.e. being moved from I.S. for lone parents onto JSA.

I have gone back to college full time to try and get some qualifications !!
I think that there is bad news on this because you'll have to sign the "jobseeker's agreement" and this requires you to be available for work, furthermore, after a period on JSA they can oblige you to participate in some sort of "work programme" which may clash with your college attendance.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

duplication of the post above due to buggy forum software (hanging) failing to confirm successful post.

Edited by loan_ranger
duplication of the post above due to buggy forum software (hanging) failing to confirm successful post.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi thankyou , i have been trying to use the benefits advisor , but its too restricted , and it says im not eligible for jsa because im in college full time !!! i dont no if i can get another form of benefit ??? iv looked on student finance but because im doing an access to higher education it seems i cannot get mature students grant because u have to be at higher education level !! our system is pathetic i worked full time for 12yrs with no benefits and now i need a bit of help they kick ya while ya down. im trying to study to get a degree to be a social worker which is something they keep saying there is a lack of and there overworked no wonder if wont help anybody study for it !!! i came out of last interview feeling hopeless .... god knows what will happen on 28 th ... x

Link to post
Share on other sites

chedworth98 Re: Benefit entitlement Review PLZ HELP - im worried i will lose my home!

hi thankyou , i have been trying to use the benefits advisor , but its too restricted , and it says im not eligible for jsa because im in college full time !!! i dont no if i can get another form of benefit ???

This is what I thought but didn't dare to say, the move to JSA means that you'll be obliged by the rules to leave college or lose your benefits.

There may be a way around this e.g. the Open University.

About 10 years ago I got accepted by the OU and the course fees were covered by a bursary award from them because I was on a qualifying benefit.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this might get duplicated my original reply has just disappered lol !

what is the difference is jsa to income support ? apart from looking for a job but in money terms i will be on exactly the same pay ?? i did enquire to open uni but they said access course was better for the line of work i wanted and because of no qualifications ... who do you think i should ring ? will i be classed as benefit fraud for not declaring starting college ? i didnt think i had to because not recieved any grants or anything ... x Thanks for replying x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chedworth,

 

You should be able to stay on IS untill your course has finished,

your Lone Parent Advisor should confirm this for you when you attend your interview. It is important you attend your LPO interview because if you dont they will close your IS if you fail to attend twice,

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/lone-parent-pack.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this might get duplicated my original reply has just disappered lol !
The forum board up-graded software really sucks!

what is the difference is jsa to income support ? apart from looking for a job but in money terms i will be on exactly the same pay ??

Flexible New Deal (see: an account of a real person's experience of a New Deal boot camp), the replacement schemes under the con/dems "work programme" and the possibility of doing "work for your benefits" could occupy you for 30-40 hours mon-fri, apart from that I believe that there are JSA rules whereby a claimant becomes ineligible if they are attending college.
i did enquire to open uni but they said access course was better for the line of work i wanted and because of no qualifications ... who do you think i should ring ? will i be classed as benefit fraud for not declaring starting college ? i didnt think i had to because not recieved any grants or anything ... x Thanks for replying x
Part of the JS Agreement is "being available for work", going to college is incompatible - sorry, but by their rules it might be bye bye benefits! While I was writing this MikeyD has come up with something more useful (above).

Regards "which course", talk to the OU and try to talk to an admissions adviser, explain your new situation and have your options reconsidered, perhaps a B.sc.(hons) psychology, social sciences or nursing may be appropriate to your chosen career path.

Edited by loan_ranger
added comments

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the OP will able to stay on IS untill she has completed her full time education on the course she is enrolled on now. :)

If this lasts for one, two or three years then she is entitled to complete this course. BUT if she were to come off that course and starts another one then she will not be entitled to IS

 

the LPO officer should be able to advise her. ;)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

update : went to benefit review , the women was new and lovely , there computer was not saying a date to come off income support even though my daughter is already severn she updated with college and said i will eventually get a letter to come off income and then we can discuss whats available , i may have already finishe college by then ! so all ok panic over but thanks for your advice anyway xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...