Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord got CCJ on Service Charges - can we appeal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4911 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Cags,

We wish to make a claim for our services charges which we paid ;

but was told that we had not paid.

 

The matter ended up in Court was wrongly advised to accept the bill

because we were unable to produce recipts of payment at the time.

 

Our case hinges on the fact;

that if from the records of the landlords we had not paid our service charge for ten years as they claim ;

that was clear infringement of our lease;

 

the question we like to ask is why did not the landlord take us to Court at the time?

 

Although we have sold the property and the so called ,arrears, settled through our solicitors

 

can we still take the matter to Court for a rexamination of the whole payment arrears

as we are still not happy and believe we have cheated.

 

Any takers please

 

:?:

 

Knights Templar :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you explain this a bit clearer ?

 

Who advised you to 'accept the bill' ?.

 

By 'infringement of the lease' you mean a breach of covenent, this process is slightly different. If a landlord is chasing you for service charges then there are 2 routes he can take:-

 

1) Start a S146 claim, this is for possession of the property, so seriopus but rarely fully suceeds and is more likely used for the scare factor.

 

2) A 'normal' court monetary claim (I assume this is what happened).

 

Service charges are not automatically payable, they must first be demanded (in accordance with the lease) and after Oct 2007 in accordance with Section 21B of The landlord & tenant Act 1985.

 

There are many defences to servicer charges (and either yuou or L can apply to an LVT to rule on it).

 

Your problem would appear to be your previous 'admission' (I was in the same boat when I was niave and 'admitted' an amount in 2005.)

 

I'm afraid I dont know much about overturning previous court decisons (but would like to know too).

 

Also there would appear to be some sort of limitation, its very unlikely a landlord could chase you for anything over 6 years (and it many cases for service charges, the limit is 18 months).

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

Responded to your thread regarding service charge this afternoon.

 

Very foolish of us to have accepted debt initially;

 

was advised by Solicitor to accept otherwise this would delay sale of property

as landlord could instigate a charge on property.

 

We belive there are quite a number of anomalies in their submission to the Court

which I would seek some thread from other cags.

 

Quite interesting your point about the issue of ststutte limitation ;

 

can we use this a part of our defence ?

 

Knights Templar:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes..When u r selling it is best to avoid dsiputes, i believe you are supposed to disclose any disputes to potential buyers..jeez..Id be screwed if I wanted to sell. Ive had one LVT case (partial succesful), one court case regarding ground rent and upcoming are another court case regarding refund of amounts decided in first LVT and another court case about landlords breach of lease for not repairing driveway area.

 

Anyway, The limitation act is normally thought of as 6 years, with some exceptions, when tenants have argued about service charges it can sometimes be 12, although im pretty certain when landlord is chasing tenant the limit is 6 years.

 

You may like to visit LandLordZone, where I and many others discuss leasehold issues, this thread is about limitation issues.. http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?32657-Service-charge-arrears

 

There is a seperate 18 month rule for service charges see Section 20B http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/70 but this can be overidden by Paragraph (2)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

Good response and kind for your statute limitation on the issue limitation;

 

but I still not quite sure whether I can challenge the landlord in Court or LVT

for a review of the case since I believe we have double paid the landlord on our service charge.

 

The onus on us would be perhaps to produce the previous receipts to the LVT or the Courts;

 

to prove that we have paid as claimed by the landlords

 

but you see we do not have the receipts as this goes as far back many years

 

and have lost or destroyed payments receipts,

 

but as I ponted put if we had not paid our service charge for such a long period

 

we may the have broken the terms of our lease in which case why did not the land lord take us to the LVt

 

or the Courts to claim their service charge ; this puzzling ?

 

Any way hope a cags comes on line with some line on the matters.

:?:

Knights Templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

Thanks for yur thread on service charge;

 

you are correct it is not easy to win at the LVT;

 

I think I may have to think carefully before any action on the matter.

 

Need a quicky on this thread ;

 

hoe any cags may come up with something.

 

 

Combined loan and overdraft into a one loan -£30k by Nat West Bank

 

unable to pay ended up in Court ;

 

Court decides monthly payment £50.00 per month .

 

Can still request CCA Nat. West ,

 

although payment have been determined by Court?

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...