Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! PCN from London Borough of Hounslow


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4775 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope you guys can help me with this one, im new to this, but would rather not pay these creeps!

 

One the way home on a extremely torrential downpour from my new job i had to pull over to double check i was going the right way with my iPhone. Well this morning I had a PCN for (02) Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force.

 

Firstly - is stopping to look at a map consitute waiting a long enough time?

 

Secondly - It says the location is Douglas Road, however this doesnt make sense, I know I didnt go down this road (wouldve needed to turn right). Can i get out of it if it states the wrong road but i was somewhere similar nearby with a imilar enforcement?

 

Here it is on google maps. I wouldve been coming from the Hanworth road A315 and kept going straight through that junction (not right onto Douglas Road). I pulled over onto the red coloured section of Hanworth Road by the Always and Forever Bridal studios.

 

It wont let me attach a link because im new but in google maps type in hanworth road douglas road hounslow

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Douglas+Road,+Hounslow&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=20.909591,57.084961&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Douglas+Rd,+Hounslow,+Middlesex+TW3+1DA,+United+Kingdom&ll=51.467577,-0.361884&spn=0.00536,0.013937&z=17&layer=c&cbll=51.467465,-0.361901&panoid=9L4bElroAxA29Mjxr9c9Pg&cbp=12,181.74,,0,24.13

 

Definitely a wrong location. Also the time plates are on lamp posts 28 and 31. I thought for 02 they need to be within certain distances.

 

Firstly - is stopping to look at a map consitute waiting a long enough time?

 

Code 02 are an instant. But if enforced by CCTV, most places allow 2 mins.

 

BTW restrictions are for 8am-8pm from google map. What time was PCN issued? A little further at pedestrian crossing, single yellow line is not properly terminated. What are the restrictions for P&D bay?????

Edited by starfarer
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I too received an (02) penalty charge notice, for pulling over on a single yellow line for a few momments to attend to my phone. The CCTV camera clearly shows my foot still on the brake, as the brake lights are on at the back of the car, where the photo was taken and can be clearly seen on the picture as on!...... How can they charge you £50 for pulling over for a few mins and still being behind the wheel of your car. I could not have been there for more than a few minutes. It is humanly impossible to crawl along the road, creating a danger for other drivers, not looking at the traffic in front as you search for tiny sign. This is outreageous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too received an (02) penalty charge notice, for pulling over on a single yellow line for a few momments to attend to my phone. The CCTV camera clearly shows my foot still on the brake, as the brake lights are on at the back of the car, where the photo was taken and can be clearly seen on the picture as on!...... How can they charge you £50 for pulling over for a few mins and still being behind the wheel of your car. I could not have been there for more than a few minutes. It is humanly impossible to crawl along the road, creating a danger for other drivers, not looking at the traffic in front as you search for tiny sign. This is outreageous.

 

Not really that outrageous, a hands free phone doesn't usually require you to stop to answer it so there should be no excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...