Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Being 'forced' to obtain a sick note for child?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4935 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sorry if this is the wrong place, or indeed the wrong type of forum for this but just thought I'd ask if I can be forced to obtain a sick note for my daughter, by her school? We asked for one days holiday for her during term time and the school will not authorise it as her absence last year was below their required minimum (she is in year eight). I can just about understand this - and I know we have no 'right' to take her out of school in term time. They have also said that ANY absence, even sickness, from now on will be classed as unauthorised unless we provide a doctors sick note! :|

 

I do not want to waste my GP's time if I know she has a virus, or an upset stomach for example - which I KNOW does not require a visit to the doctor but also means she is not well enough for school, so I'm stuck. :-x Help please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't see what they could do if they refused to authorise absence if she was sick. If she's ill then she's ill - if she's absent and she's not ill that's a different matter. Double standards of course, if you sent her into school when she was sick and was throwing up all over the classroom, they'd probably give you both barrels for it.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, apparently if she has too much unauthorised leave it is reported to the local education authority and we could be fined! Of course by refusing to authorise leave, even sickness, the school are actually making this more likely to happen .... catch 22!

Link to post
Share on other sites

An annoying situation which I have been in several times with my kids at school. There is no legal requirement as far as I know for you to provide sick notes but the schools and local authorities act like social service so all you need to do is cover your ass.

 

As the childs parent or legal guardian you are responsible for your child and are able to determine by your own inteligence as to whether or not your child is fit for a day at school. The school just want to cover their ass too so make their day by writing a short declaration to them that can be recorded against the absent days.

 

"It was of my opinion that on 18/10/99 Tom Smith was not well enough to attend school without the probability of causing alarm or distress to himself or others. For that reason I took the decision to allow his absence on that date."

 

It works for me so shold work for you.

 

Sign it. A persons signature is very powerfull in law so use it

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, apparently if she has too much unauthorised leave it is reported to the local education authority and we could be fined! Of course by refusing to authorise leave, even sickness, the school are actually making this more likely to happen .... catch 22!
"could" is the operative word here. And they couldn't just fine you, they would have to take you to court and win a case to show that you deliberately and neglectfully allowed your child to miss school.

 

The law has been changed to allow schools to deal with truanting where the parents collude or don't do anything tp prevent it, and some schools are abusing the change in law to try and bully parents. Remind them that for employees, it's only after a week that you need a dr's certificate and its a self-cert before that, so could they please show you where it says in law that you have to provide a medical certificate for a child's absence from school, and it they can't (they can't!), let's have no more of this nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...