Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BC Goldfish a/c mercers/debt managers/ call serve - now arrows


francoe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3776 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks.

 

Just had a telephone conversation with Debt Managers Ltd regarding Barclaycard Goldfish.

 

Problems started on this account in sept 09

when i advised them wouldn't be able to make repayments bal was 692.

 

Was handed to dml in may 10 bal 925.

 

All charges & interest.

 

Telephone conversation this morning they were able to offer settlement 500 around 46% drop.

Can i pay this now.

I advised them next that i didn't agree with their balance

& would take the path of reclaiming the charges so as to get the balance to the original 692.

 

They then gave me a 7 day f & f of 445.

 

I then replied if i reclaimed the charges & got to the balance of 692

& then applied there wonderful percentage reduction of 46%

i would be somewhere near to where i wanted to be, 350.

 

They then offered me for today only 370.

 

I am lucky to be able to get my hands on this amount & telephoned back to make payment.

 

Before i make the payment i asked the question what guarantee would

i get that i would not be chased further down the line for any more money

& how it would appear on my credit file.

 

Their reply was i would receive a letter stating that i would receive a full & final settlement letter from dml

& then the account would be returned to barclaycard goldfish.

 

It would be entered on my credit file as part payment settled, but settled.

I would like to take this opportunity to get rid of this debt but its the wording on my credit i do not like.

 

Is this correct or should it be showing as satisfied or does this matter

 

.Also if account is returned will barclaycard ever come looking for the difference.

 

When dealing with these people i just don't believe anything they say.

 

I post it here as it will come to be connected to the above barclaycard account

in the fact that i will be taking the same sort of action with them.

I have untill 8 tonight to do something.Any guidance on this appreciated.Ever helpful Slick?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Tell them you want the credit file to be marked settled (marking it part settled when the rest is charges is blatant cheek) and then you will pay up. Don't forget if they don't give it to you in writing you write and confirm this.

 

Also you want the money paid to YOU and not taken off the balance - this is another little nasty ploy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't rush into settling on their terms.

 

What is the real a/c balance, before their penalties and interest. Have you done a spreadsheet for this yet, to see what you should reclaim on the a/c for charges and interest.

 

As far as their deadline, it's a ploy to extract money from you asap. So don't feel you'll miss out if you don't agree to their terms today.

 

Without confirmation in writing BEFORE you pay them, you could find they send no letter and they still pursue for further payments.

 

Experience suggests they will NOT show the debt as settled unless you pay off the full a/c balance. This is a good reason to negotiate properly, get the charges and interest removed from the account and then see what balance remains. You may well find you can pay it off in full AND have the a/c showing as fully settled.

 

Posts moved to a separate thread to avoid confusion.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right a short layout.

 

Had the account some years running in terms with a couple of charges.

Sept circumstances change cant afford to repay.

Jan 09 12.00 chg

Aug 09 12.00 chg

Sept 09 sent letter explaining my situation along with the CCCS recommended £1.00 Token payment

& a request not to penalize me or continue to chg interest.

 

Sept 09 a/c bal £692.28 c/l £700.00

 

Sept 09 2 chgs £12.00 each

 

This pattern continues until & incl April 10

(Some reason no chgs in Nov)

 

a total of 16 chgs @ 12.00 each

 

Token payments to date 6 @ 1.00 & 8 @ 5.00

 

by my reckoning

Total chgs 192.00

Interest 46.18

Payments made 46.00

284.18

 

their closing balance sent to DCA 925.01

Less above deductions 284.18

Leaves 640.83

 

Any advice with this info.Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you set about formally reclaiming the charges and interest to reduce the current balance.

 

Have you put all the charges on a compound interest spreadsheet and used their Cash Advance rate as the rate at which to claim back interest.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i have used the egalegal compound calc as per your link but didnt use car rate.

 

In rough working out i added the par & the car & diveded by 2 & used that.

 

Dont ask me why i just wanted to see roughly where i was.

 

So i use the car,ok.

 

Now to the end date of the charges.

 

The last time i was charged was april do i use that date or the date i send the claim?

 

Also this account is with a DCA.

 

Do i still send the claim direct to Goldfish?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless the debt has actually been sold by BC to DML, which I doubt, send the claim letters to BC.

 

I've replied on your other thread about interest calcs - use the Cash Advance Rate.

 

8)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So your of the thinking that BC have not sold the debt to DML.

 

How do you know if a debt is sold on,

 

do BC have to inform you.

 

What is the purpose of DML.

 

How can DML offer such a substantial reduction as per above.

 

Is this a trick to say that you have a full & final settlement

but only from DML & then BC chase you again for the remaining through another agency.

 

When i spoke on the phone i did ask if they were in any way connected to BC

& their answer was no.

 

Also when i offered to pay £350 f&f their reply was BC would not accept this.

 

Thanks again for your input.

 

On both.

Edited by francoe
screen jump halfway through post
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Francoe,

 

BC often use Mercers and Calders. They are BC's regular debt collection monkeys but the a/c is always still owned by BC at this stage.

 

In your case, I suspect the a/c is still owned by BC because they tend not to sell off a/c's to outside DCA's. DML took it over after just 8 months so I think it's still BC's.

 

Write to BC direct about reclaiming the charges and see how it goes.

 

Re the CCA route, with the benefit of hindsight, it's maybe a good thing you didn't pursue it as this often causes an impasse with BC.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel11

Thought i read somewhere that this was not the one to send it too.

 

Mass mail & all that.

 

Actually have sent letters here before & have been denied as received.

 

Is this there main registered office add is it not a London add or is that Barclays bank,

 

are they not the same?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Northants address is fine for the Prelim Letter and LBA but see here about who to sue when you file your N1 at court - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?173450-Use-the-right-name-when-Filing-against-BC

 

8)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

 

I am after some advice or information regarding the passing of debts from one company to another.

 

The debt is on a Goldfish card which was passed to mercers first sometime in 2009.

 

In 2010 it was acquired by DML & I continued payments to this company.

 

Whilst paying DML in June i received a letter from a company called Call Serve asking for payment on this account.

 

I continued to pay DML this month having had no notification from them to say otherwise.

 

Yesterday i received a letter from Call Serve saying that i had disregarded their recent letters

& a local debt collector had been instructed to call.

 

Prior to this letter i called Call Serve to ask who they where only to be asked for all my information

of which i refused to give them & proceeded to tell them to ask DML for all relevant information regarding this account.

 

I also quoted the doorstep calling.

 

This met with the answer `we are debt collectors we can do what we want`.

 

This does not bother me & is a load of fanny.

 

What gets my goat is the way they toss a balance from one to another with no regard for any other information

& then expect you to do their job for them.

 

what i would like to know is what angle can i go back at Call Serve in regards to getting them to supply me

with information that they have purchased this debt

& how much for.

 

I can handle the doorstep call with the template letter & was thinking of some way adapting the account

in dispute letter forcing them to do some work.

 

Any suggestions much appreciated.

 

Cheers R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Send them the "Prove It" letter.

 

If you haven't had a notice of assignment don't pay them.

 

If I wrote to you demanding money saying I was a debt collector, could I really expect a cheque in the post from you? I think not.

 

Another thought....are you confident that any of these dcas have a right to collect?

 

Have you thought about reclaiming any charges and/or ppi on the account?

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply

 

The prove it letter sounds good.Is there a template to view on here?

 

How do you mean assignment?Is that a ccj,as none of my debts are ccj.

 

I agree about not just paying any tom dick or harry & how do you mean am i confident about the dcas having the right.

 

PPI is non existence & i have done charges previous.

 

Cheers R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply

 

The prove it letter sounds good.Is there a template to view on here

 

How do you mean assignment?Is that a ccj,as none of my debts are ccj.

 

I agree about not just paying any tom dick or harry & how do you mean am i confident about the dcas having the right.

 

PPI is non existence & i have done charges previous.

 

Cheers R

 

Hi

 

Prove it letter is here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ng-of-the-debt

 

No...not ccj. A Notice of Assignment is issued when a debt is transferred to a dca. Its basically just a letter telling you that the debt has been sold or assigned to another company.

 

What I meant about having the right is did you get a Notice of Assignment form the original creditor telling you that the debt had been passed on? Also a CCA request can be sent to a dca (with a fee of £1) which requests a copy of the credit agreement. If the dca can't provide one then they have no right to collect the debt.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the letter link.

 

A notice of assignment,

interesting i will have to dig back in file to see if i originally received this from goldfish.

 

Does this also apply from mercers to DML & DML to Call Serve,

i mean does this happen every time it gets sold on?

 

As to the CCA request i tried this line in 2009 to be sent photo copies of certain things

but at the time people seemed to be hitting a wall with this.

 

I dont know if you would call my debts at a semi advanced stage.

I have done the charges & tried the CCA route.

 

I started paying token payments @£1 p/m 2009,circumstances improved £5 p/m & now at £10 pm in 2011.

 

All this was done without ever questioning whether any of their paperwork was correct,

 

i just felt a duty to pay my debt.

 

I have been through all the threats & the differently worded letters but came to the conclusion

that they would not take me to court.

 

i paid DML £10 p/m,

next without a word,

Call Serve want the whole lot.

 

I can handle this tactic.

 

I m a new client to them.

 

Can I go back at them & ask them to prove this account without prejudicing any previous work already done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Prove it letter is here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ng-of-the-debt

 

No...not ccj. A Notice of Assignment is issued when a debt is transferred to a dca. Its basically just a letter telling you that the debt has been sold or assigned to another company.

 

What I meant about having the right is did you get a Notice of Assignment form the original creditor telling you that the debt had been passed on? Also a CCA request can be sent to a dca (with a fee of £1) which requests a copy of the credit agreement. If the dca can't provide one then they have no right to collect the debt.

 

Regards

 

ims

Also just tried link but cannot access it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It is excellent that you have been making headway into your debts.

 

The problem with the debt collection industry is that it is rotten to the core and they don't play by the rules. This is why some people get caught in the trap of making payment after payment without much knowledge of who they are paying and why. It sometimes happens that payments go into the dca pocket rather than going off the debt. Some dca's buy the debt in which case a Notice of Assignment is required while others act on behalf of someone else so a NoA is not required.

 

You can always send a CCA request to any dca...it won't prejudice what has gone before. Rather than using the request to challenge anything in court, it can be used as a tool to verify that a praticular DCA has a right to collect the debt.

 

Do you receive any statements of account at all and if you do, can you reconcile them to any figures you may be keeping?

 

It is up to each individual of course but if you are in doubt you can always send a CCA request. If they cannot provide the relevant docs then they have no right to be collecting the debt. Doesn't mean that debt doesn't exist, it is just you don't have to pay that particular dca.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

It is excellent that you have been making headway into your debts.

 

The problem with the debt collection industry is that it is rotten to the core and they don't play by the rules. This is why some people get caught in the trap of making payment after payment without much knowledge of who they are paying and why. It sometimes happens that payments go into the dca pocket rather than going off the debt. Some dca's buy the debt in which case a Notice of Assignment is required while others act on behalf of someone else so a NoA is not required.

 

You can always send a CCA request to any dca...it won't prejudice what has gone before. Rather than using the request to challenge anything in court, it can be used as a tool to verify that a praticular DCA has a right to collect the debt.

 

Do you receive any statements of account at all and if you do, can you reconcile them to any figures you may be keeping?

 

It is up to each individual of course but if you are in doubt you can always send a CCA request. If they cannot provide the relevant docs then they have no right to be collecting the debt. Doesn't mean that debt doesn't exist, it is just you don't have to pay that particular dca.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Ok

I agree that the whole DCA thing smells like a sewage works on a hot day.

 

I have took a lot of advice from this forum & the people on it & used it in anything i did

& must point out out that it has been of the greatest help.

 

I know my debt.

I know who it is originally with.

 

How do you find out if a DCA bought a debt & for how much?

 

As per your reply it seems the next port of call is to go after Call Serve with a CCA to verify this DCAs right to collect.

 

No statements since leaving Goldfish except end of balance & i keep my figures.

 

To sum up send call serve a CCA Request.I am ok with this aslong as i can use the account in dispute?

 

Cheers R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You won't find out how much was paid for the debt...that information isn't available to Joe Public...it is commercially sensitive info.

 

If a debt has been sold then a Notice of Assignment has to be issued.

 

I would CCA Call Serve and see what comes back. Take it from there.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...