Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stirling Park Bailiffs at my dorr regarding unpaid Ctax - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4921 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi just found this and need advice asap as i have had no idea what to do.

 

Had 2 Men from Stirling Park approach me last week, i was just getting the kids into the car and one asked for my husband i said he is at work and they asked if i was his wife. Feeling a bit scared i said no and that i was the childminder and he asked where my husband worked i said i didnt know they name of his employer as i mostly deal with him wife. He then went and put a letter thru the letterbox. I waited for them to leave and went back in to get the letter which was a summary warrant for council tax (which until then i had no idea wasnt being paid as i sent direct debit form back to the council in march) on further investigation i realised they obviously didnt get this form as no direct debit has lefty our bank for this year so we owe £1600 (this includes stirling park's fee) from what ive seen on here i did the right thing no revealing who i was or my husbands employer i am writing a letter ( which will be sent by 1st class registered delivery) asking to pay in installments and sending the first installment of £100, im on maternity leave and do not have the funds available to pay in full at this time.

 

Few questions i have tho:

 

1. How do i send this £100 as i do not wish to disclose our bank details to them can i send postal order???

2. will they accept this ??? as i am worried sick to the point of actually being physically sick and shaking when thinking about it hence why i have no phoned them as im worried i'll disclose information i dont want them to know

 

My husband works away as a lorry driver so he cannot contact them i worried sick they will arrest our bank account or take our belongings we have 2 small children aged 2yrs and 4mths.

 

Please help x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok calm down a bit .

 

no they cannot do those things so's don't worry

 

pay the council direct via internet banking what you can now, the details are on the back of your Ctax bills.

 

phone the council and see if they will make an arrangement to pay too and call the bailiffs off.

 

expain what you have here to them esp about he kids and on maternity etc etc.

 

keep us posted

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few issues I see with your post.

 

You are on maternity leave and that means you are pregnant, you are therefore considered to be a vulnerable person for the purposes of civil enforcement and therefore, action must cease and a bailiff must withdraw from your property. Contact the council with a printout of this: http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part10 and ask they take the case back into their control.

 

If you don’t have the money to pay the whole liability now then the council doesn’t have a choice but to accept £100 a month.

 

If you did not know bailiffs were going to visit you then that is probably because you did not receive a FINAL NOTICE beforehand. The law requires the council to send you one before applying for a liability order: The Law: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/33/made

 

The council is also required to issue a summons when it applies for a liability order. The Law: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/34/made Bailiffs cannot enforce payment without one.

 

If the council still refuses to comply with the law then say you will make a complaint to the Local Government Ombudsman (http://www.lgo.org.uk/making-a-complaint/) and ask they pay you compensation for failure to comply with Regulation 33/34 of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992.

 

In the meantime, make your home safe and keep all doors locked until this matter is resolved. Never let a bailiff into your house, call police if anyone causes a disturbance or you feel threatened, and remember that door must remain locked shut until both the bailiff and police are a safe distance from your property, speak thru the letterbox if necessary. Capture everything on video using your mobile.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Yes you can send a postal order. Can you confirm it was s uammry warrant or a charge for payment?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi it said summary warrant on the letter they put through the door. They have an online payment system through netbanx so i paid them £100 through that on monday and i sent them a letter recorded delivery telling them we would pay them this on the 18th of each month until the debt is cleared. Didnt get any joy at the council at all they kept passing me to different people then was finally told i'd to deal with stirling park.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have done the right thing - just ensure you make the payments you have offered and on time.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Havent had a response to the letter i sent them on monday do i take this as a good thing or a bad thing?? dont worry i will def be making the payments on time each month im too scared not to thanks for putting my mind at rest guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be very surprised if Stirling Park did not accept your offer. If, on the off chance, they didn't you could always go back to the Council and ask to speak to a team leader. Explain your circumstances and the offer that you had made. In the scheme of things that is a pretty reasonable offer and you shouldn't have a problem having it accepted. I'm surprised that Stirling Park sent Sheriff Officers out. They would normally send a standard letter out first as this is considerably cheaper than sending out a couple of officers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunate;y the court will not do anything as mummy did not request payment arrangement via court when the charge for payment was sent.

 

Stirling Park have their fees covered if SO's are sent or not as there is an automatic surchage of 10% applied to the balance when the summary warrant is granted.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their fees are only covered if they collect on the debt. If they are passed an account there is no guarantee that payments will be made and consequently they receive nothing in the way of commission. That's why they normally send out a letter first.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but that's wrong. The 10% automatic charge is theirs and this is applied via the council at summary judgement before it is passed to the Sherriff Officers.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 10% charge may be theirs but 10% of nothing unfortunately is nothing. Once the summary warrant is signed by the Sheriff the10% charge is intitially the Council's. They will normally hold on to the debt for around six weeks and most will try to work the debt themselves. The debt will then be passed on to the likes of Stirling Park. The only income they derive is if they collect on the debt or do dilligence. If they fail to collect after a given period normally negotiated between the Council and the DCA/Sheriff Officers the debt is then often second placed with another debt collection firm.

 

If local authorities actually handed over 10% of the debt in monetary terms that passed to DCA/Sheriff Officers they would quickly become bankrupt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally had a response from stirling park yesterday. The letter i wrote said we would pay £100 on the 18th of each month, they are saying the minimum we can pay is £175 by the 3rd of each month the first being next week! and they stated the balance of the debt as £1633 i paid £100 on the 18th of oct and this hasnt been deducted. We cant afford £175 at that time of the month as our mortgage comes out 2 days later and im still on maternity pay should i try the council again £175 is more than the actual council tax was each month and when we start paying that again next april we cant afford both unless we get a lotto win :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

as in post 3 &

pay what you can afford diect to the council by internet banking.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pay what you can afford, the £100 you have proposed.

 

 

Did you send a budget sheet with your proposal?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im supposed to make this £175 payment by wednesday could someone please help the letter said they wont refuse any payment but further action may be taken if we do not make the £175 payment which we cant afford we offered to pay £100 if my letter to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you contact the Council? Stirling Park are collecting the debt on their behalf and can override level being asked for. Looking at the amount they are trying to make you pay suggests that the Local Authority you come under is keen to ingather as much of the debt as possible within the current financial year and have instructed Stirling Park to make arrangements on that basis.

 

Speak to someone within the Revenues section of the Council, preferably a Team Leader, and explain your situation and the fact that you have already made a payment (it sometimes takes a while for these payments to show on your Council Tax account). You will also probably have to show how you will be able to pay towards the arrears and maintain next year's Council Tax when it starts. If that fails speak to your local councillor. They are usually fairly influential in cases like this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...