Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disqualified from driving by the DVLA questions needing answers please?


thesquashedgoblin
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4934 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all,

 

First of all, this is my first post on these forums, but I'd like to say hi to everyone who reads this, and a personal thanks in advance to anyone who replies.

 

So secondly, a bit of background information, relevant to this query. In march of this year, I was summoned to magistrates court, to answer for a speeding fine [sP30] which would have resulted in a ban via totting up. I present a defence, pleaded guilty, and the following happened as I am a carer for a disabled relative. The courts found exceptional hardship in my defence, with regards to the relative, and gave me the 3 points [taking me to 12] but waived the ban, while I still had to pay the £65 fine. All done and dusted with; nothing more heard.

 

So about a week ago, I tried to hire a van, needing to move some stuff. So I phoned up a local company, explained the points situation, and they said "fine, we dont have an issue, but we'll have to call the DVLA just to double check it is a valid license" . . . . . a phone call later, the guy says "I'm sorry, but the DVLA have said you are on the disqualified drivers database". To cut a long story short, I'll save you the rants and raves, and harsh language used. I phoned the DVLA and spoke to a very unhelpful person, and basically asked when was I disqualified? What offence did I commit? What for etc etc etc

 

They said that they had sent out letters telling me as such, but I have not recieved any of these letters, furthermore I explained that I have not recieved ANY court summons, for any new offences. I've literally had no information at all; and I was exceptionally upset that from my perspective, they've just randomly decided to ban me from driving. After getting a little bit heated; they asked me to leave it with them, and the enquiry would be handed to the relevant department . . . but I decided to send an email form in as well, to back my call up and get a reference.

 

As yet, I've had no response and my main concern is, I still have a motorbike privately insured . . . but they are unaware of this ban. Or at least havent told me they have found out. So I'm somewhat at a loss; and could do with some guidance and help please?

 

As far as I can see, the only offence this could possibly relate to, is the one I mentioned right at the begining of this post. Also, they wouldnt tell me how long the ban was for, or exactly when it was enforced, only that the paperwork was issued two months ago. They have told me to send my license in, and I have point blank refused, until this cock up is dealt with I'm sending them nothing.

 

Sorry for the mind splurge lol; hopefully someone out there will be able to direct me a bit further with what i can do to get this sorted.

 

Regards, the goblin :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

To further clarify this, now that I've recovered from my mind splurge what I need advice on, is the following:

 

Are the DVLA acting unlawfully, by not supplying me with ANY details of the reasons/purposes for, of the disqualification?

 

Can a court, just randomly decide "Right we've changed our minds; and now you are banned" without first supplying me with information, or issuing me with a summons to court?

 

The DVLA person I spoke to, insisted that they had been informed by the magistrates court, that I was disqualified from driving. The DVLA pro-offered no further information in relation to this statement. Is this correct? Can they "just do this" and what if any legal re-courses do I have at my disposal?

 

Currently, the DVLA have failed to reply to my enquiry, and have failed to reply to my email. Because they have not supplied evidence to suggest why I have been disqualified; can I still drive?

 

I'm seeing a lot of references to writing to my MP; at what stage in the DVLA's lack of correspondence should I do this?

 

Many thanks in advance once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you went to court and received the sentence of points/fine, how did the points get put on your licence? Surely you had to surrender your licence to them there and then?

 

If you did, presumably the licence was sent to the DVLA to have the points added, and they then returned it to you showing these new points. If it included a ban, I thought they would have witheld your licence, so you wouldn't have it in your possession now.

 

If you didn't surrender your licence, then this might be part (or all) of the problem. i.e. if you didn't submit your licence to have the points added within a specified time scale, then I think that automatically the system will revoke your licence which may be being inturpreted as a "ban"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crem, thanks for the reply,

 

Yes I submitted my license there and then, at the court, on the day of sentencing. It was taken off me by the Legal Adviser; and passed to the magistrates I believe. Then a couple of weeks later, I got my license back through the post, though I dont think it was in a brown DVLA marked envelope . . . though I cant be sure. The points and the fine, including the date of sentencing and the date of original offence, and the notes about no disqualification due to exceptional hardship, were only hand written onto my license however, not printed.

 

I made some more calls yesterday, and the Courts were very helpful, they have all my case notes on file and said the information with regards to the statutory declaration I signed, were sent to the DVLA in march this year. The DVLA have said they havent been told of any Stat Dec.

 

So basically, I find out, that the disqualification is from the same offence. Only the courts had been sending correspondence to an old address, and I'd never recieved them, as such in February of this year the courts sentenced and disqualified me in my absence. This is the disqualification the DVLA now have on record still, and while the disqualification period has elapsed, they want me to reapply for my license, but I dont want to because the ban will then be on my record.

 

It wasnt until the current occupier of my former address, came round and gave me a bunch of mail, that I discovered what had gone on, rang the courts immediately. They brought me in to sign the Stat Dec, and then the case went to square one, it was re-heard and then I was sentenced as described above. So the courts are saying that the original ban and fine, were nullified by the Stat Dec and are no longer enforceable, the record of them should have been wiped. The courts have re-sent this info.

 

But now the game is with the DVLA, who have said "when we get the info; we'll take a look . . . cant give an exact time as to when that is" , my response was, well thats just not good enough. This is my license here, this is my relatives only source of mobility we are talking about, the disqualification is wrong in the first place because it was quashed. The replies I got were standard, the courts know what to do, replies. Very unhelpful bunch of people really; and thats being mild.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very unhelpful bunch of people really; and thats being mild.

 

It would appear from that comment that you are indeed speaking to the right department at the DVLA (well actually I think the comment is accurate for ANY department at the DVLA!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LoL, indeed, that is very true!

 

This site and forum has been invaluable, for helping me understand the wider problems people are having, with an organisation that I previously had mild respect for. What amazes me, is that these people at the DVLA, think that there is nothing wrong with them making a mistake, and then having this half-arsed attitude towards rectifying it. I mean, the guy I spoke to basically just went round in circles saying "The courts know the process. When they send us the information, we will look into it, but I cant give you a timescale." I asked to speak to his manager "I cant put you through to my manager, you will have to write in"

 

So finally, I got so upset, that I just said "If you guys are going to spend weeks, bouncing me from pillar to post, while you dont actually sort this mess out . . . you are leaving me with no choice, and I will have to write to my MP." The cheeky git was like "dont threaten me" their attitude towards customer service is disgusting, they should rename it the "Driver go and f*** yourself helpline" and the term helpline is rather generous of themselves too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting that they see your act of informing your MP as a threat. It's not like you threatned to send your dad round to beat them up!:roll:

 

They have no complaints process so what else can you do? Go for it let your MP know, maybe the more of us that do something above them will force a change for others... it's nice to at least hope. It's easy enough to write to your MP, you can do it online at writetothem.com - it works. I've done so 3 times this year.

 

Ultimatley your MP can send a complaint to public sector ombudsman, which you can't do without the help of your MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, thats correct, I even had the Deputy Courts Manager of Staffordshire courts service ring them for me. They promised her it would be dealt with yesterday; that didnt happen so I phoned them back up and laid down the ultimatum. "You seem to believe that you are entitled to ignore a representative of Her Majesties Courts Service; lets if you think you can get away with ignoring a Member of Parliament"

 

And I have to say, its surprising how helpful people can get, when you kindly offer to take matters completely over their head. **** rolls downhill as they say.

 

Anyway, looks like I might have this sorted by today. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...