Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Aggressive tactics of the Shop Direct group.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4824 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.I'm a newbie to this forum and for my first post, would like to say that I too am suffering the aggressive tactics of the Shop Direct group.

Very brief outline of my tale of woe - A couple of years ago I got into financial trouble and defaulted on a balance of £498 with littlewoods. I buried my head in the sand and tried to avoid the calls and letters. Eventually though, I saw sense and started to pay the debt off after i took out an extended loan with shop direct.This allowed me to pay the debt by monthly payments plus the promise of no further charges or harrassing calls,but it also took the debt up to an extortionate £800. Anyhow,Shop D broke this agreement straight away as the charges just continued even though i was making payments and for the last 6 months or so, they've taken every opportunity to charge me. Now they're harrassing me with telephone calls ( 11 in the last 4 days! ) even though a payment isn't due for 6 days.

To cut a very long complicated story short, my original debt was £498, I've paid £290 of that off, but due to extended plans/charges/interest/whatever they feel like adding, I somehow still owe £668 - £170 more than the original debt!

I didn't intend to default- like most people i'm an honest person who's fallen on hard times.

I guess the golden rule is don't get into debt in the first place, but I do feel Littlewoods/Shop D need to be less aggressive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, bramblebuster.

 

I've used your first post to start a new thread, please check your Notifications.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, just thought I'd update you on the me v SD situation. After writing to them for the nth time - yet again explaining my financial circumstances and yet again asking for them to correspond in writing only......what do I recieve in the post by return? A standard computer generated letter adding another charge to my account !

Cheeky bar stewards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Latest news with regard to Littlewoods/shop direct.

I've taken my case to the Financial Ombudsman, who are still investigating. In the meantime, Littlewoods/SD have started to give me 'courtesy calls' and have applied yet another charge to my account for non payment of arrears. I was under the impression that all charges and collection activity was to be suspended pending the investigation, but maybe i'm wrong...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I hope you get some joy with the FOS, most of these charges on your account are re-claimable, I think they only take any notice once you file at court, hopefully you won't need to go that far.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear Caggers,

 

Update for those interested....

 

Littlewoods/Shop Direct are starting to harrass me with the telephone calls again. So far, just the 3 calls in 24 hours.

Despite the fact that they have been given written notification of how I wish to be contacted ( writing only ) they recommence the telephone harrassment.

Despite the fact that the account is being investigated by the FOS, they persist with the harrassment( written form )

Despite the investigation, they persist with adding charges for non payment ( i'm not going to pay what I don't owe,especially as it's under investigation at the time! )

Despite them being aware that every telephone call distresses my disabled wife, they persist in the harrassment.

 

I can take the harrassment, but my disabled wife can't ( nor should she have to ). I want to come down on these morons like a tonne of bricks, but I know that my frustration and anger would come through and I'd end up behaving offensively and irrationally.

Does anyone know of any sensible course of action / legitimate legal threat I can make them to get them to back off whilst the FOS complete the investigation?

I thought about threatening them with the police ( as I would with any other person causing harrassment )

All advice and suggestions gratefully received!

Yours in annoyance and frustration

 

Bramblebuster

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they ring again you could also tell a little porkie that worked till I got my real machine. Tell them all calls are recorded and you have a true call machine that logs times of unwanted calls and origin, worked for me with them, although they have now past it to a dca, but it still stopped the harassment. Ask them to put a note on the file that you have told them no calls contact and you will be gathering proof to make a harassment claim against them.

 

In meantime log the calls

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...