Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds or wescot


upthewall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear everyone. I will try and keep this short. Not so many years ago I had a reasonable job with a liveable income.

 

Took on the usual amount of loans that the banks are keen to throw at you.

During my loan agreement with Lloydstsb I was made redundent and could not keep up with the repayments.

I had also taken on loan protection at the start as advised but later found this to be a waste of time as I did not qualify when I fell out of work for some tech reason that I did not understand.

 

I went through the usual battle with Lloyds trying to come to some suitable repayment plan that would be exceptable.

As my offer was too low Lloyds refered me to their collections dept and soon after I started getting threatening letters from a company called Wescot.

 

Throughout and from start to present Lloyds have been so unhelpful.

I have not refused to pay, I just cant afford to.

 

I have not as yet replied to Wescot as I am afraid as to what to say.

 

Recently as a final straw I have sent another letter to Lloyds explaining (again) my current circumstances and offer of £20 per month to start clearing my debt.

 

As usual I get no reply from Lloyds but instead get a letter from Wescot excepting my offer.

 

This is where I am confused.

 

Am I paying Wescot or Lloyds and what should I do ???.

 

As previously explained in letters to lloyds I am a single parant to one primary school age child,

I struggle to find suitable part time employment that fits around the school run,

am on a very low income,

have no assets or savings

and live in a council house that is rented by my retired father.

 

I really am stuck in the dark as to what to say to these people and from day one this has affected my health.

 

If anyone can offer me any help/advice I would be most grateful. Thank you all in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

certainly get reclaiming that useless PPI

 

can you scan-up your agreement,

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

 

as for wescot, or any DCA, they have no powers so's don't worry about them.

 

i'd pay lloyds directly via internet banking what you can afford [£20 will be ok]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there. Yes Wescot are acting on behalf of Lloyds I believe. Lloyds didnt even give me the chance to make an exceptable monthly offer. As I have not yet communicated with Wescot and have only given my personal financial circumstances to Lloyds collections dept, who have failed to reply again and instead pass to Wescot the letter I wrote to loyds, I am wondering is either party in breach of any kind of law as to the way they are dealing with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, as wescot are only acting for lloyds i would NOT reply to them and please dont speak to them on the phone.

 

as for lloyds you must send a FORMAL LETTER OF COMPLAINT, asking them why they have not replyed to your previous letters

 

and your offer of repayment after all you are trying to address your current situation. state to them should they choose to ignore

your letter and proposal of a token payment then you will contact the fos with regard to the matter, as i belive they are indeed treating you unfairly . make sure you send the letter via recorded mail. you should also send a sar request to lloyds it costs £10

 

this will get all the info they have on their systems about you inc the ppi. you should look in to reclaiming this ppi, as you may indeed find they owe you some money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...