Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mutiple Bills of Sale on the same vehicle.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If a loan company puts multiple BoS on a vehichle spanning several years for different loans with gaps of a year or so between the end of one and the start of another which BoS is the one that is valid.

 

Can all the Bills of Sale run at the same time, or does the issue of a new BoS cancel out the old BoS?

 

Is a BoS only valid for the period stated on it if the person had paid off the loan attached to it, or can the company still 'own' the vehicle even though the loan was paid off.

 

If someone gets to the end of their agreement and they haven't paid the loan does the company need to issue a new BoS to cover the new agreement?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
If a loan company puts multiple BoS on a vehichle spanning several years for different loans with gaps of a year or so between the end of one and the start of another which BoS is the one that is valid.

 

Can all the Bills of Sale run at the same time, or does the issue of a new BoS cancel out the old BoS?

 

Is a BoS only valid for the period stated on it if the person had paid off the loan attached to it, or can the company still 'own' the vehicle even though the loan was paid off.

 

If someone gets to the end of their agreement and they haven't paid the loan does the company need to issue a new BoS to cover the new agreement?

 

Thanks.

 

if the bill of sales are by differant loan companies then only the first bill of sale stands. and another thing to remember is its life time which is 5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a loan company puts multiple BoS on a vehichle spanning several years for different loans with gaps of a year or so between the end of one and the start of another which BoS is the one that is valid.

 

My understanding is that it will always be the 1st BoS that runs true - subsequent BoS could be seen to be 'fraudulent' it is only where the lender and you agree that a new BoS can be registered that a subsequent BoS MAY be considered relevant.

 

Can all the Bills of Sale run at the same time, or does the issue of a new BoS cancel out the old BoS?

 

A lender can register as many BoS as they like BUT NOT on the same security for the same consideration (loan).

 

Is a BoS only valid for the period stated on it if the person had paid off the loan attached to it, or can the company still 'own' the vehicle even though the loan was paid off.

 

A BoS issued as a security instrument is valid until such time as the terms and conditions have been met - i.e if you have repaid the loan; the lender should make arrangments to cause the BoS to be marked as 'void'; therefore there is no way they can stake claims to a vehicle once the loan has been repaid or if the BoS is found to be void or unenforceable.

 

If someone gets to the end of their agreement and they haven't paid the loan does the company need to issue a new BoS to cover the new agreement?

 

NO, the lender cannot simply draw up another Bill of Sale - if the loan remains unpaid at year 5 - the lender must renew the original registration via the proper channels.

 

Thanks.

 

Hope this is helpful

Apple : )

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is the same lender, are they able to give you another loan on the car which pays off the previous loan and gives you some extra money.

 

If they can, does this BOS need to be sworn in to the court by a solicitor?

 

Also should a sworn BOS have a solicitor's name and address shown, or can they just sign?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is the same lender, are they able to give you another loan on the car which pays off the previous loan and gives you some extra money.

 

Interesting point you raise - as lenders tend to enter into multiple agreements without thinking of the consequence to the Bill of Sale - effectively; if the 2nd loan you secure is used to clear the original loan - then this would mean that the Bill of Sale that the orignal loan applied to is clear - therefore the lender no longer has a loan secured by way of a bill of sale on the original loan - however; if the lender takes steps to secure the 2nd loan with a bill of sale and it can clearly be seen that the old one has ended and a new one has been entered into - then that is fine - it is where the lender gives you a second loan without clearing the first loan that they run into problems of potential fraud.

If they can, does this BOS need to be sworn in to the court by a solicitor?

 

Yes, they must follow the procedure as if they are doing so for the first time all over again and they must be sure that they meet the requirements of the Bos Act and CCA all over again for the 2nd loan.

 

Also should a sworn BOS have a solicitor's name and address shown, or can they just sign?

 

Since the BoS Act 1882; the Bill of Sale itself only needs to show the signatures of you and the person who witnessed you sign it. The lenders Address and Name must appear in the document as well. The document must be in the form as shown in the schedule of the 1882 Act - bear in mind the lender can add sections to this form only on the basis that the additional statements in no way infringe on your consumer rights.

However, the Affidavit must show the Solicitors Name and Address and confirm the name and address of the person who witnessed you sign the Bill of Sale and also the lenders details along with a mention of your occupation.

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...