Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses." The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses   ALSO According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”.   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Contents insurance claim advice please - stolen bicycle


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4929 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,This is my first post so please be gentle! I have tried to search the forums but couldn't find a similar query so here goes...My bf had his beloved bike stolen recently, it's the (equal??) biggest love of his life, both the cycling and building it up from scratch to his specification so it was totally unique and the culmination of a few years' work... however...He had the bike propped up in a shop doorway, fully inside but unlocked, and it was taken from behind him. He gave chase with some help from good samaritans but couldn't get it back and no sign since. We haven't yet started our claim but he has a crime number and has been assembling receipts etc. My question is - Do any of you have experience of claiming for an unlocked bicycle and do you think we stand a chance? We've never done it before, contents insurance is with Morethan and I was sure to include the extra payment to cover pushbikes off the property.Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance.Moo

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Morethan policy requires cycles to be locked to fixed object when left unattended.

 

So for a successful claim you need to show that the cycle was not unattended. The Insurers will ask him how far he was away from the cycle and what he was doing.

 

It is possible that the Insurers could set up a cognitive interview to assess the claim. This is just to make sure the story about how the cycle was stolen holds together i.e. that the story makes sense. If he has any witnesses to what happened and this is helpful, this might also assist the Insurers.

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Both,Many thanks for the welcome and your advice. I think you've cracked it - the point to argue is the "unattended" aspect, and an angle that we hadn't thought of before, in our distress! The interview is also something I hadn't heard of so I'll prime him, also there had been a possibility of getting hold of CCTV from the shop but if not then the manager will help I'm sure.We also have plenty of receipts, order confirmations etc regarding the type and value of her assembly at the time, along with photographs. Is there anything else I should think of before we go into battle (it shouldn't feel like that but I've heard too many horror stories lol!) ?Have a good evening all, I'm off to watch some Chilean miners and feel all warm and fuzzy inside xM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just play it straight. Don't be tempted to make the story fit the terms of the policy. With cognitive interviews you are asked many questions and you have to answer them in a genuine way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree. Remember that they have to prove it was genuinely unattended to risk not wanting to make the payment, as any legal costs from defending you pushing it would probably outweight the cost of paying the claim. If you tell even small lies they will use this to discredit the entire thing.

 

As unclebulgaria said - just play it straight and get as many witnesses as possible and from the sounds of it you should be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,Thanks again for your thoughts - my plan for the weekend just gone was to assemble all our evidence and make a start on the claim - playing it straight of course, I'm not one for trying to test the boundaries with these types of things, plus I wouldn't want to wreck my credibility for the future.However - in an astonishing turn of events, his (very distinctive) baby was "handed in anonymously" not far from where it happened! Possibly someone tried to sell it on to someone who recognised it, so we have one very happy boy again.I was heartened to receive such good advice so quickly as there are plenty of people far worse off on here, on so thanks again for your advice, and don't take this the wrong way but we've thanked God / our lucky stars we didn't have to use it!All the best,Moo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...