Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ whilst in Prison!


hassibabe
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

 

I have a major problem with severn trent water and its really doing my head in because these guys have no clue what their right hand is doing from their left!!

 

Ok little background info, i moved into property 19 july 2009 had a few water bills come through that i ignored, had a Notice from Count Court come through sometime in november 2009, called up water and agreed to avoid ccj i must pay by water card. No problem i start paying by water card.

 

Then i know i am going to prison on 26 march 2010 so i call them say i'm off to prison send me a final bill (this info is logged on their system). No final bill came before i went into prison.

 

came out of prison on 21 july 2010 then checked credit file last month and i see a ccj from them for £97. I call em up and am told send proof of being in prison and we can see what to do. I send proof of this to them. I get a letter from them now saying give us proof you're no longer responsible for bills at address from 26 march 2010 EVEN THOUGH i was sat in prison and they have evidence of this! Anyway get proof from landlord that i was no longer responsible after 26 march 2010.

Now i recieve a bill saying they want £197!!! I call them and ask waht the hell they on about, i get told from the date i moved in 19 july 2009 to 26 march 2010 my bill was £105.76. I have made payments to the amount of £104.30. They then tell me that they have added £100 court costs, £25 solicitors fees £4.09 interest fees and £2.25 fees for something else. I then say tell how exactly you get £197.64 when what you've just said to me comes to roughly £130. Phone was put down on me!!

 

I have a spliiting headache from dealing with this and need some advice as to how i can proceed with this issue and especially wether or not they could give me the ccj.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to bring up an old thread again, BUT i haven't dealt with this problem due to dealing with other issues and now this ccj is starting to be a thorn in my side! The above poster advised that if i could prove i was in prison whilst the claim form was issued i should be able to get it set aside. Is the claim form the Blue Paper they send out before going to court (Form N1 i think). If its the BLUE paper before going to court, yes i DID get that before going to prison, but i called up Severn Trent who told me to avoid action just pay by watercard which i did do, then i went to prison after the 3rd payment. It was whilst in prison that judgement was made and i didn't get a chance to respond to the judgement & most annoyingly is that i did tell servern trent that i was going to prison BEFORE and they didn't send me out a final bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting a set aside several years after the event may be difficult, but give it a try. Does not mean it will be granted and you will still have the bill. It may be advisable just to pay off the amount owing, so at least your credit record would then show as paid.

 

This link should help you.

 

http://www.trustonline.org.uk/understand-judgments-fines/set-aside-a-judgment/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to bring up an old thread again, BUT i haven't dealt with this problem due to dealing with other issues and now this ccj is starting to be a thorn in my side! The above poster advised that if i could prove i was in prison whilst the claim form was issued i should be able to get it set aside. Is the claim form the Blue Paper they send out before going to court (Form N1 i think). If its the BLUE paper before going to court, yes i DID get that before going to prison, but i called up Severn Trent who told me to avoid action just pay by watercard which i did do, then i went to prison after the 3rd payment. It was whilst in prison that judgement was made and i didn't get a chance to respond to the judgement & most annoyingly is that i did tell servern trent that i was going to prison BEFORE and they didn't send me out a final bill.

 

 

 

So you were served with teh papers and had left it 2.5 years to apply to set aside?

 

I think you will struggle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the ccj was issued in May 2010 whilst in prison, came out in July 2010, found out about ccj in sept 2010, went back & forth with servern trent till march 2011, then i handed it over to solicitors in April 2011, sent off some paperwork to court in northampton in May/June 2011 & haven't heard back from them. Its only because i'm looking for a mortgage this issue has come up again and needs to be dealt with. And yes, i HAVE paid servern trent thier money....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the ccj was issued in May 2010 whilst in prison, came out in July 2010, found out about ccj in sept 2010, went back & forth with servern trent till march 2011, then i handed it over to solicitors in April 2011, sent off some paperwork to court in northampton in May/June 2011 & haven't heard back from them. Its only because i'm looking for a mortgage this issue has come up again and needs to be dealt with. And yes, i HAVE paid servern trent thier money....

 

So the set aside is purely that you want it off your credit record !

 

I don't think it works this way. You can try to set aside on the basis of your absense and therefore you could not pay before the CCJ was granted. Also you have since dealt with the debt and the CCJ on your record is unfair.

 

If you don't try, you won't know. There is no guarantee.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCJ is not marked as satisfied and i've not applied to the court to mark it that it has been paid. I'm more wanting to have it removed as it should have never been there in the first place. I've thought of possibly writing to severn trent and asking them to remove the CCJ as i've read somewhere that they can have it removed if they're willing.

 

The other thing that does get me is that the amount claimed is incorrect on the CCJ & severn trent know the amount claimed is incorrect. Then we have the issue of them saying that there was a warrant fee and they gave me a warrant number, i checked my local county court and they said no such warrant was issued & they checked my name for any other warrant numbers and found non. I contacted northampton & they told me no warrant. Now all along ST have been adamant that i pay this warrant fee, its only when i told them that i have checked the warrant number up and there is no such warrant AND by them claiming that there is such a warrant and wanting me to pay it would result in me reporting them to the police for a criminal offence under the Fraud Act 2006 & The Theft Act 1968. After quoting the sections i was told someone would call me back, 2 days later i get a call back & suddenly i'm being told there never was any warrant & whoever told me this made a mistake. So i left it & paid them the balance that i owe. Now i do have bills which show this apparent warrant on it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...