Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not sure about the lease read through all the documents i have and couldnt find anything about parking. Contacted the management Office to get a copy sent to me. When i complained to them about the ticket they told me to appeal so they clearly don't care.      and yes it's a gated underground parking area with key fob entry. 
    • The coronavirus pandemic has thrown many countries into recession - but what exactly is it and how could it affect you? View the full article
    • Oh and before bed   Officially leaked statements about a PHE report claiming that a UK study will say there is little evidence of children transmitting Covid.   Leakers stats look impressive until you realise he's on Johnson's SAGE so makes you think - huh - hows that then when all the science I've seen says different, and there are a number of reports of spreads in schools across the world from schools that had opened.   Then, little as the information 'leaked' is, you see   "largest studies in the world on coronavirus in schools" and then "The study was carried out in 100 institutions in the UK and is expected to be published later this year. About 20,000 pupils and teachers in 100 schools across England were tested to monitor the spread of the disease up to the end of the summer term – which runs from April-July in Britain."   Then you click. That averages 200 pupils and staff per 'institution' checked We dont know what these institutions are, but I think over 200 is the average for infants schools. Other schools tend to be FAR larger. Did they test everyone at each institution, or just some ??? we don't know yet - they are choosing not to leak that - Wonder why?   We currently understand that younger children (pre teenage) seem to present few/less symptoms  (statistically) but large increases in teenager covid has been reported as lockdowns ease and they start to meet more.   I know my OH's grandson (mother a nurse) has remained at school in classes one third or less that normal, with the majority of kids having front line worker parents - so well aware of the discipline and hygiene necessary. We know the schools maintain distancing, monitoring and maintenance which would be IMPOSSIBLE in normal class sizes.   So in a lock down situation, with class sizes significantly lower than normal (highly aware front-line workers kids mainly), increased distancing and cleaning made possible by SIGNIFICANTLY smaller class sizes - Has maybe resulted in no great evidence of covid spread perhaps?   Well Whoopy do. Lets ramp the class sizes back up to 30+ and see what happens ..     Lets let the mail lead the way Coronavirus infection rates are rising in ALL age groups under 65, Public Health England data shows with biggest surge in under-fives which 'should be watched very carefully' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8615423/Coronavirus-infection-rates-rising-age-groups-65-Public-Health-England-data-shows.html     and the ONS stats showing how similar the stats are (a statistically significant  difference can be very little actual difference)   https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19infectionsinthecommunityinengland/july2020     Notes: These statistics refer to infections reported in the community, by which we mean private households. These figures exclude infections reported in hospitals, care homes or other institutional settings.  
    • i understand and agree you should write a formal letter of complaint about the email by royal mail.   i also think you should totally dispute the arrears balance, esp as it goes back so long   send them an sar and add to the text in it that you want statements/bills dating back to the gb energy a/c.
    • When you see the reports coming out that serco was involved from the earliest stages apparently to give expertise   and that resulted in 18 million plus people coming back into the UK untested from hotspots .. and then even the general advice to self isolate after they had travelled across the UK home being withdrawn in the run-up to the lock down   That went well says cummings      
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies

Credit Reference Agencies Data Retention Period

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3591 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Do you think the time limits for Credit Reference Agencies should be reduced  

6 Caggers have voted

  1. 1. Do you think the time limits for Credit Reference Agencies should be reduced

    • Yes I would like to see a reduction
    • No I believe the current durations are the right length

Recommended Posts


A general question I am looking for opinions on. I find myself increasingly frustrated with the period of time Credit Reference Agencies retain data on people which if you are not in debt does not cause an issue generally, however, for those who do miss payments, get defaults or other bad news details added to their credit file this clearly can have a long term damaging effect which can either stop any future credit or cost you more to obtain it.

Is this justified? I believe not for the following reasons.

1. 6 years is a very long time to have negative data about you available even after you have sorted out your financial situation and are able to make payments again on time.

2. The reason for getting the negative entries does not show the ‘cause’ and importantly, what you sacrifice to try to resolve the issue before and during the issue leading up to the bad news.

3. You can of course add an entry to your credit file of 200 words explaining your side (not that 200 words allows for much), but can anybody confirm that online applications even bother taking note of these before turning you down.

4. If you are a ‘won’t pay’ 3, 4 or 6 years will not make any difference to you whereas for those who are or were a ‘can’t pay right now’ a reduction in the retention time would make a huge difference.

5. Your previous years of being a loyal customer who paid on time, etc is lost and not considered.

6. The negative effects are felt by your immediate family.

7. The current time limits are not law but ‘agreed’ between the Information Commissioner and the CRA’s / financial industry – who got a say from the public, nobody!

8. Once you are in recovery mode and making all payments, the past still effects the present and the next few years before the negative effects diminish.

9. This can also impact your ability to gain employment as some companies check your credit file.

10. Anyone of us is only something unforeseen away from this affecting us

I am really keen to now what others thing about this as I feel exceptionally strongly about this and would like to see a 50% reduction in the retention period.

Kind regards

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

what it will take is a government in power who aren't back slapping with the industry. if we were ever to get that then i feel they could take the bull by the horns and actually write into statute a time period, preferably three years tops. hopefully they would also write credit referencing into statute too- the mish mash from the dpa 1998 and cca 1974 is not fit for purpose. they might actually shake up the ico and take it to task.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi OUTADEBT excellent post.

this could infact fall somewere under the human rights act, or it seems to me that the said act is there to protect us. if the Default can be seen as a punisment then maybe this can be chalenged in a court of law Under the civil libites act.


more reading to do me thinks.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ok so i've done some more reading. this time in the MAGNA CARTA. and found this to be an interesting point if a Default can be seen as being a punishment which it seems to be as it infact hurts you for 6 years.


Magna Carta is an English charter, originally issued in the year 1215, and reissued later in the 13th century in modified versions which omit certain temporary provisions, including the most direct challenges to the monarch's authority. The charter first passed into law in 1225. The 1297 version, with the long title (originally in Latin) The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, and of the Liberties of the Forest, still remains on the statute books of England and Wales.

The 1215 Charter required King John of England to proclaim certain liberties, and accept that his will was not arbitrary, for example by explicitly accepting that no "freeman" (in the sense of non-serf) could be punished except through the law of the land, a right which is still in existence today.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree something needs to be done, check my post



basically I had missed payments in 2002, got my account in order Mar/April 2004. had an arrangement to pay between the time I messed up and till I got the account back in order, which I sorted the account and had my finances in order by 2004, never missed one of the payments. then paid the outstanding balence and closed the account in 2006.


so I hit problem in 2002, problem won't actually go away until Sep 2012, even though I resolved problem 6.5 years ago.

Thats 10 YEARS, or 8 since fixing it. :violin:


something has to be done about the system, it isn't right. it's not right at all.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...