Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA Platinum Card - Interest Rates to 1994! Any help gratefully received!


nortie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

Would anyone know if anywhere I could find the likely interest rates charged by MBNA from 1994 onwards?

 

I need to calculate compound interest for a mis-sold PPI claim but don't have statements to refer to.

 

Wouldn't this be a great resource.

 

Hope someone can help.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Best wishes,

 

Neil

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As it appears no one has the rates for the various years requested by the OP how does one go about claiming back PPI and the interest without getting involved in a major tennis match? Is there a guide figure that we can use? The 8% figure is added on if it should go to court I thought so would 15% be a sensible starting point or what do others suggest or have done?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smoothound

 

I have been sent T&Cs for the account by MBNA (actually not the original ones, but the current ones... naughty) however, it states the standard interest rate as 18.9%, so that's what I'm using.

 

Barclaycard interest rates for this period are substantially higher:

(found on the net)

 

Date Set Barclaycard Classic Visa APR

1 Dec 2001 17.9 with rates from 11.9

1 Aug 2001 18.9

1 Sep 2000 19.4

1 May 1999 19.9

1 Mar 1999 20.9

1 Jan 1999 21.4

1 Jul 1997 22.9

1 Apr 1996 22.3

1 Jan 1996 22.6

1 Mar 1995 22.9

1 Dec 1993 21.9

1 Jan 1993 22.9

1 Nov 1992 24.9

1 Oct 1992 28.5

1 Sep 1992 27.8

1 Jun 1992 28.5

1 May 1992 24.6

1 Oct 1990 24.6

1 Jun 1990 24.6

1 May 1990 29.8

1 Jun 1989 26.8

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smoothound,

 

I think you're assesment (IMHO) is partially irrelevant.

I'm embroiled in a litigation with MBNA at present and they are stating that the interest is a much smaller figure than the APR on the credit. If they cannot provide you with the original terms and conditions (which they should under the Carey 2009 ruling) then I'd claim the 17.9% figure as of 1998 and let them prove otherwise. It may also be in your interest to work out the compound interest on the charge (see Sempra Metals 2006 ruling) as this will amount to a more realistic amount of interest on the money they charged you. Did the PPI get added without your consent?

 

Ric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smoothound,

 

I think you're assesment (IMHO) is partially irrelevant.

I'm embroiled in a litigation with MBNA at present and they are stating that the interest is a much smaller figure than the APR on the credit. If they cannot provide you with the original terms and conditions (which they should under the Carey 2009 ruling) then I'd claim the 17.9% figure as of 1998 and let them prove otherwise. It may also be in your interest to work out the compound interest on the charge (see Sempra Metals 2006 ruling) as this will amount to a more realistic amount of interest on the money they charged you. Did the PPI get added without your consent?

 

Ric

 

Funnily enough, I've just started doing a spreadsheet and decided to use the figure that they have provided on my supposed CCA which happens to be 17.9% :D Currently I've averaged the PPI payments that they have actually given me and applied this amount to all the previous amounts that I don't have so at least I have a starting point ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...