Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Absolutely normal.  They do their best to waste your time and also the time of the courts. It doesn't cost them anything.  It costs you and it costs the taxpayer so what do they care?   These are all the reasons why you should not agree to mediation but insist on going to trial.  They will continue to waste your time right off until the trial date and then probably make you an offer.  At least then it won't be in confidence and you can tell them to go and do one if they don't offer you 100% of what you are claiming
    • No, but all you'd do is blindly run the statute barred date for another 18 months. Just sit on your hands until you get a letter of claim, then send a CCA request.  
    • A growing group of conscious consumers have found other strategies to keep companies honest.View the full article
    • Just like last time, Evri requested more time so they have another 2 weeks
    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax CC arrangement to pay ended in 02-2004, but still blighting my credit rating


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon,

 

I'll jump straight in with this, I had a Halifax Credit card which I got into payment problems after losing my job in Nov 2002.

I then had an arrangement to pay until Feb 2004; where I got the account back into order.

my account was then in order until Sep 2006 when I closed the account, however the arrangement to pay is still shown as the effective reason for my rating to be low. quoted below from check my file from the Equifax report

 

"Payment Performance"

"You have an account with an Arrangement to Pay on your credit report"

"You have 8 accounts reported on your Equifax credit report. Of these, 6 are reported as being currently active."

"You have 1 arrangement to pay on your credit report."

 

Every other section of the report except the number of credit searches(which is 0) is reported as being good.

my credit card usage is at 50% which is apparently Bang on perfect to be considered credit active and the number of accounts is also apparently bang on perfect at 6, all accounts have have been operated correctly for over 6 years, I have been confirmed on the electoral roll, I have no CCJ's or Judgements or Insolvency ever.

 

My credit score however shows at 540 or 1 star and I am an unacceptable risk to lenders. this is still keeping my interest at stupid rates of upto 39.9% on some cards, as you can tell keeping this at 50% is costing me a fortune. I also have to rely on pay as you go mobiles or venture in higher cost mobile contracts.

 

can I get that record stricken from the book as the bad balance will show until Sep 2012, or do I have to wait another 2 years still. are banks doing this deliberately to make sure you pay them higher interest rates on everything you buy.

 

any help is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

unfortunately the account will show on your file until 2012, as it is the 6 year industry standard. its obscene to think that as someone who was responsible to continue making payments you could suffer longer than someone who made no arrangement, ie you would effectively be better off having defaulted in 2002. i think you'll have to contact halifax and ask them to be removed as it is hampering your ability to obtain credit. if they refuse then slog it out down the ico route or if you need it resolved quicker, go to court.

 

i'd maybe think of another route depending on your circumstances. were there any unlawful charges on the account, mis-sold ppi? if so, write to halifax for a full refund. tell them you are prepared to withdraw your refund request if and only if they remove the negative data from your crf. it might work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already claimed back the charges on the account back in 2004, that's how I got the account back into order.

 

the sad thing is now I wish I had not bothered paying them anything at all. they treated me with such contempt at the time and made things so hard to sort out, then they have the cheek to punish me for 8 years.

 

so all you people out their, this is a lesson to learn.

 

don't ever pay your debts back, you will sort them out faster if you don't.

 

potentially I could have had a problem with an account 15 years ago and it could still be effecting my credit score, surely this goes against their own guidelines and rules.

 

this kind of shows how the CRA's could be adversely effecting their own business with the banks or the banks insistence on this system could and hopefully will encourage people to not pay their debts.

 

so for me though, the CRA has and will effect my life for a total of 10 years. if I live to 100, which I probably won't then that's 10% of my life they have taken and made me struggle with. if I take into account that I was a kid for the first 20 years then that makes the percentage even worse.

 

 

this system must be changed to only allow 6 years worth of actual data, not data that might have been stored up to 6 years ago about data over 6 years ago.

 

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr the banks and cras

Link to post
Share on other sites

and ignore your credit score from the cra. load of nonsense.

 

I'm starting to think that, I'm on check my file and get all 3 reports and they all have different accounts listed. one has no accounts on their but still scores me(low) the cheek of it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and ignore your credit score from the cra. load of nonsense.

 

I'm starting to think that, I'm on check my file and get all 3 reports and they all have different accounts listed. one has no accounts on their but still scores me(low) the cheek of it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...