Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nil Points


wishface
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got the results of my ATOS medical this morning. Not surprisingly i have scored 0 points. The scoresheet doesn't cover very much it seems. The problems I have were not highlighted at all, including the interviewer inviting me to comment on my eyes (they get tired very easily and don't focus properly without each other so they look weird - I didn't even mention it on the form). The usual.

 

So I have to fill in form GL24 and send it back within 1 month to initiate the appeal process. They didn't include this form, which didn't seem very helpful (surprise surprise). Also the letter explaining that I have to fill and return that form doesn't say that appealing guarantees payment of ESA at the assessment rate until a decision is made. It seems to suggest it's conditional; it says 'you may' still be paid ESA. Why would there be doubt; surely it's yes or no across the board?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ass rate is £65.30 per week, you must send in sick notes while awaiting your appeal date, there is no doubt you are entitled to ass rate, ring them and tell them that your appealing and don't let them fob you off. Some of them don't seem to understand the rules( their jobs).

Rbs £114 + contractual at 29.84% I won total=£125 no laughing it's a win

Don't moan about it DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again wishface. We've been through this a few times together, haven't we? I hope you have the answers on your other threads.

 

If you don't have a GL24 form, you can access one online and print it if you have a printer. Otherwise you need to ask the local benefits office.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the assessment rate is £52 per week.

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well im confused nowing to what it is! £52 or £65 it's joke how do they expect you to pay all house hold bills and feed yorself on that.

:jaw:

 

Assessment phase rate is about £65 if you are 25 or older and about £52 if you are younger. As to how you're expected to pay bills and eat, well, I don't know. But it's the rate set by law.

 

You will be paid ESA at the assessment rate if you submit a properly completed GL24 or appeal in writing in another way, provided you continue to provide medical certificates and comply with other conditions of the benefit. It can take a couple of weeks to restart payments in these circumstances.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What defines a properly completed GL24? From what I can see it's just an open space to note your appeal? Is there anything i should watch out for?

 

Also, according to the ESA department, if the process up to and including the appeal isn't covered by your doctor (which won't make him happy), then the appeal is cancelled as the claim is closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm simply asking for clarification on the policy since the DWP letter says that claiming ESA while appealing is anything but guaranteed.

 

I imagine that the assessment rate is not guaranteed simply because there are some people who would not get it (having over £16,000 in savings and not meeting the National Insurance Contributions condition)

If my posts have been helpful, please click the star icon and add to my reputation points. Thanks! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must apologise for saying the assessment rate is £52 per week but that's what I get. I am appealing my IB so I guess it's different.

 

I've been living on £52 per week since early April 2010 and I expect to do so for several more months.

 

They don't know what they are doing because I was told many contradicting things when my appeal was accepted.

 

dj

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is some advice on how to appeal:-

 

I wish to appeal against the decision that I do not have limited capability for work. I consider

that I provided enough evidence for a finding to be made that I do have limited capability for

work [if you think you should be in the support group add the words ‘and limited capability for

work-related activity].

I do not consider that the decision maker took full account of the severity of my condition or of

the way that it affects my everyday activities and bodily functions.

[if you wish, you can give an example of why you think the decision maker got it wrong, such as:

For example, in my questionnaire I stated that because of my depression I usually cannot

motivate myself to do everyday things like getting out of bed, washing, dressing or eating

breakfast unless my partner repeatedly encourages me. Yet I was awarded no points for this.

This is only one example of why I think the decision is wrong.]

Please do not ask me to provide further details of my grounds of appeal as I will not be able to

do so until I have been provided with a full copy of the papers and had the opportunity to try to

get independent advice and support.

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re. the ESA rate during the appeal, I can't say for sure because I've not "been there" myself, however I distinctly remember when the welfare reform bill was still in the early stages (i.e. "green paper" being debated in Westminster in late 2007) the proposal was that claims going to appeal would be paid at 80% of the base I.S. rate (which is the same as JSA), therefore 80% of £65.30 = £52.24/week. I reckon dj is "on the money".

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A properly completed GL24 (or a "duly made appeal") just means the claimant must give sufficient information within the GL24 (or letter, if the appeal is by letter) for the DWP to locate the decision which is being challenged, (Name, address, NI number, name of benefit being appealed against), the appeal must contain grounds for the appeal (reasons why the claimant feels the decision is incorrect), and it must be signed by the claimant or their appointee.

 

ESA assessment rate payable pending an appeal is £65.45 for a person over 25, and £51.85 for a person under 25.

 

For IB appeals, a person can either claim JSA or be paid income support at a reduced rate pending the appeal outcome. The reduced rate is 20% less than the current income support rate. Income Support is currently £65.45 for a person over 25. So for a person over the age of 25 appealing an IB decision, they can receive £52.36. For a person under 25, Income support is currently £51.85 so they can get £41.48 pending an IB appeal.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you need help with your appeal, your local council welfare rights officer may be able to help. Just ring the council and ask for welfare rights to get an appointment.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welfare rights officers are a dying breed. Even the CAB is too stretched to represent people but they will advise. Some areas have an "Advocacy Service" usually in the local mental health department.

 

Gone are the days of Legal Aid for us lot too.

 

dj

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also like to add that the Princess Royal Trust for Carers often have very good welfare rights officers as do MIND. I have received great help from both.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DWP have written back in receipt of my GL24, received on the 11 (apparently). But there is no mention of the restoration of ESA, nor does it say that, if that's the case, payment will carry on from the point it was stopped (so that there's no break in payments).

 

What the DWP seem to say (and regardless they are the ones holding the pursestrings) and what is advised here are two different things and, understandably I think, I don't know what to believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...