Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are banks allowed to issue second or ongoing default notices?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have default on my credit file from santander (cahoot) from 2005, the debt is still not settled though, and it's likely I'll still be on a payment plan with them for several years.

 

Since my default will drop off my file next year (it'll be 6 years), are Santander allowed to put new default notices on my file (for as long as I'm not making normal repayments and have interest frozen)? Someone told me that if they wanted, they could put a notice on my credit file every month until the debt is settled - this will be quite annoying considering I'm 6 months away from being default free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great, so they only thing they can do is put a CCJ (which I can hopefully fend off). I've already go a copy of my statutory report from all agencies, and am also signed up to creditexpert - which is a ripoff by the way.

 

I wonder what my file will say next summer, when the default is gone, but there's still this mysterious outstanding amount to Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all, and I guess they could in theory go straight to CCJ and give me no opportunity to prevent this? Is this likely?

 

I'm trying to keep santander at bay while I throw all I have at a higher priority debt, and don't want them rubbishing my credit file in the mean time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that a default could be issued as many times as they like and it's only once they follow it up via a letter of termination that no further default notices can be issued?

 

It's only one default on a credit file granted but if it's not on a credit file and is simply a creditor issuing them then it's up to them ...

 

That was what I thought anyway.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that a default could be issued as many times as they like and it's only once they follow it up via a letter of termination that no further default notices can be issued?

 

If the default was remedied within the 14 days (i.e. brought up-to-date) then another default notice could be sent at a later stage should the debtor fall behind again. An account would only default once the 14 days have expired. As far as I was always trained (and as far as my interpretation of the CCA is concerned) is that a default can only ever happen once. Once an account has been breached, you cannot unbreach it! It's a bit like a rope being cut in half!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There certainly seems to be a topic open to discussion here.

 

I have read on other sites that purport that the person answering is a trained Solicitor, that although as has been said a defaulted default? can only occur once in the lifetime of a debt, there is nothing to stop them being reported ad infinitum for as long as they remain unpaid, on your credit report, ie, putting them back on as soon as they fall off - I really cannot believe that that is the case otherwise there would really be little point to the credit file agencies really would there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all the replies, it looks like there are some different thoughts on this. It might be better to break it down into two issues: the default notice letter, and the default notice on the credit file.

 

The default notice letter: In my experience I have received multiple ones of these from the same creditor, all advising me of x number of days to remedy the situation.

 

The Default on credit file: As mentioned before, I have one of these from 5 years ago, and it'll drop off my file next summer. Since the debt is still not settled, and regardless of how many default notices LETTERS they may send me, can they put a new default on my file? I would hope their only next option is to go for the CCJ.

 

I'm going to contact experian myself with this question (got to get something from my £8 a month creditexpert subscription).

 

I really need to get a definite answer on this, as it will be a big influence on my whole strategy here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FSpencer..Sequenci is correct, one default per debt on your credit file, once it's been entered onto your file it can not (should not) be adjusted and will naturally drop off your file 6 years to the day....no they cannot change the default date...and what I assume you mean is that with each spurious default notice they're sending you ..you're thinking they can update your credit file from that date? Nope, it starts from the date it was first entered.

 

Just as an aside here, I had a default registered by Egg, it dropped off my file as it should have done 6 years to the day, that I thought was the end of it...but not with egg because several months later my credit file

was updated by egg again and they had adjusted both the amount of money owing and the default date, in essence extending it by 6 months...altogether against all the guidelines/regulations/data protection act..

I contacted the CRA's who wrote to egg and egg removed the newly added defaults. I've since progressed my complaints against their stupidity with the OFT, ICO and TS ...

 

As for my previous comments re default notices (as opposed to default entries on a credit file) and sequenci's clarification afterwards...I think Sequenci's opinion is correct.

Edited by Deb T

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the many users get confused between

 

markers

 

and

 

default notices

 

and

 

default sum letters

 

 

markers [late payment/over limit/no pay etc etc]

can be and are reported every month to the CRA's and 'mark' your file.

 

a default notice is a one off thing until the 'reason' on the DN is rectified.

 

if its not, they cannot issue another one.

 

if you make an 'arrangement to pay' then break it, i 'think' a further DN can be sent as the old one would have benn 'rectified' by making the 'arrangement'

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...