Jump to content

Summary judgement or strike out?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3594 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A lender has issued proceedings after sending an obviously faulty Default Notice


More than 12 months on and several adjournments later, they have now sent another (correct) DN and have applied to change their POCs


I want to contest this on the basis of CCA s87 in that they started proceedings without a valid DN which is confirmed by their issuance of a new one at this late stage


I want to ask for a strikeout;


a) Is this wise?

b) If not, why not?

b) If yes, would it be sufficient grounds to apply for summary judgement instead (or as well)?


Any help really would be appreciated


Thanks for any assistance

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...