Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
    • first time to use this forum, so a bit clueless got a PCN from Horizon, saying that "exceeded ma stay period" any template for me to make appeal please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DCA tells me to contact bank for further information


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Just a quick bit of advice, sent DCA a CCA and SAR, they have replied to CCA and also told me they have sent SAR to solicitors, also if i need any further information i should contact the bank.

 

My questions are this.

 

1) If DCA claim to have deed of assignment, why tell me to contact bank for further info, surely they should hold all info about account since they purchased it.

2) Is it normal to send SAR to solicitors, or are they hiding something and what to find out exactly what they should send. SAR requsted deed of assignment.

3) Can i put account into dispute, as credit agreement is barely readable and no t&c's sent.

 

Any help on these 3 ponts would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

AWA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angry

 

1) They should have all the details on the account, just deal with them, remember if they don't provide data as per SAR Request you can report them to the ICO.

2) Your SAR request is a legal request, there is no reason that it has to be sent to the solicitors, unless they are filtering the data. You could send the bank a SAR

Request that way you know you are going to get the complete data. Remember they've only got 40 days, after that report them.

3) Scan, Post the agreement after removing all personal details. The guys here can have a look.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel11

 

Sorry for delay, internet connection went down for most of day. The agreement is OK, except i have copy signed at time loan taken out, now capquest have sent me agreement identical in everyway, except the agreement they have sent me has a totally different signature than the one i have, everything on the agreement they sent is hard to read except the signature and date signed.

 

Could that be fraud???

 

I know that they can reform an agreement, but its has to be original copy, a new signature is not part of original agreement, is that right?

 

Thanks

AWA

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

they can't 'reconstruct' a signature!! if they've sent you a 'generic' application form with what they purport to be your signature on it and it is not your sig, then they may be onto a loser!? if they have got the original, then why don't they just send an exact copy of it!? (btw, don't let them know that you have a true signed copy of the original! :-))

 

imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angry

 

So what your saying is that they are trying to pass off the agreement they sent to you as the original agreement. They sent a covering letter, do they specify what the

agreement is? Have they used the word 'Reconstituted'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

One thing i have forgot to mention, looking closely at dn, its says "The outstanding payments are currently"

then

"due on 10/05/07" £500.

 

Dn was dated 05/10/08

 

Agreement was signed on 19/04/07, so what they are saying is i owed £500 22 days(is) after signing contract, monthly payments not even that much.

 

Wish i could upload, but quality is bad.

 

AWA

Edited by AngryWithAmex
days wrong
Link to post
Share on other sites

try and post up the docs, including the dn. what is the 'remedy' date for the dn? is there any missold PPI involved?

assume it has been sold on as you mention 'deed of assignment'? did you get notice of such assignment? have they threatened legal action? who's the dca? etc. a few more details would be more helpful? i think maybe you'll need to post up the docs for further opinion? as you say, maybe regard it as in dispute as it seems that they haven't sent you a legible copy with any tc's?

 

imo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford

 

Default was 2 years ago and then terminated about 28 days later, seen off many DCA since then, but this one brought details and seem more stubborn.

 

Still have my ace up the sleave, once i have finished messing then about, taking them through FOS at the moment, FOS not very fast so hopefully drag this out for another couple of month, when FOS back DCA as i have no trust in FOS backing the consumer, i'll then appeal and that should take another couple of month.

 

After that should have some new ammo to slow then down.

 

AWA

Edited by AngryWithAmex
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...