Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • can you get some phots of the roof and eaves ect without trespassing on his property? insurers will have to amke good if it is your neighbours property that is causing the problem but i would ask a surveyor to have a look first so you know what to say from the outset to get the best outcome. Your local council also has powers to order them to take action but as they wont engage it may well take the 3 years you ahve given yourslef for the house move
    • you have been stiched up  but you really should have walked away from this well beofre reading the paperwork, let alone signing it.   However, the incentive is part of the contract, same as being given a free gift as part of a sale doesnt mean the retailer caqn give you somehting that is broken and not make good just because it was "free". so, back to the incentive and the terms you signed. Chances are the terms make the contract voidanyway but we wont knwo that until we see it. give us a good idea of what this is all about and you may well find a couple of people will give you the advice you need.
    • I have given them independent reports from two roofers that say they are beyond salvageable due to the upward curl on most of them along with a few cracked.    I have given them 3 quotes for removal (I was / am happy to pay for the reroof, but was based on it being slate as I could have taken it down myself.)    They have been out and taken photos themselves of the current roof along with pictures I sent in when we first found out it was asbestos after that was done was when they offered the £200 and they wouldn't comment any further on the matter.    They have asked me to have it tested officially opposed to an visual inspection but each time I ask them will they cover costs if it does come back as asbestos they ignore the question, three times I have asked.    It was 3 years ago but I first raised the complaint at the start of this year.    The age of the roof in question dates back to the 1920s when the house was built, the main building had its original bare Welsh slate roof with limestone mortar. 
    • Agree, you need to start a formal complaint and keep it in writing but also make it clear what you expect as an outcome. An apology and some commitment to better staff traing regarding general customer services but specifically handling of medical emergencies would be in order. They have a responsibility for the health and safety of all peopel on the premises and it does look like this point was sorely missed by the manager. i would also expect them to write off the cost of the ruined meal as well, you didnt paln in advance to ahve one of your party leave in an ambulance so their actions are pretty shoddy
    • so ask for a quote for their removal. you say due to the state of the tiles but give no indication as to what that is. You do need to have something specific to wave at them to get any movement and at the moment you dont. For all they know you could be telling lies just to get a few quid to go travelling with. so get proof of asbestos and a quote for removal if the roof is too far goen for repair. Pictures to show what they shopuldnt have missed will also bolster your case. I also note that it was 3 years ago so you have enjoyed the benefit of the roof for that time regardless of what it was made of. An estimate of the age of the roof will also be needed as that will help determine whether they should ahve been looking for such materials in their survey.
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
mysticpols06

Cabot/Morgans **COURT PAPERS ISSUED**

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3578 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Original Links:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?166869-CABOT-Aarghhhh!!&p=1797323&viewfull=1#post1797323

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?172388-CAP-ONE-NO-AGREEMENT-NOW-SOLD-TO-CABOT-I-THINK-WHILST-IN-DIS-Hmmmmm!&p=1859669&viewfull=1#post1859669

 

 

Afternoon everyone - Have received papers from Morgans on behalf of Cabot obviously. Am calling on my usually fab supportive cag crew for some serious advice please please please!

 

Firstly - the last i had heard is as posted above, in reply to my response to their first template regarding proceedings. I responded in the time scale requested and no further warning of intending to proceed was sent.

 

Secondly, they have combined the amount for this acc with the amount of the cap one acc they have of mine (see other thread) - so how do i stand with getting the cases seperated or in your opinions is it better to have them combined?

 

Thirdly - Bearing in mind my two threads re Cabot that many of you have been following and aiding the past two years - Do you think it is possible to win this - and not only win but possibly counter claim for the costs incurred, defamation to my character by reporting the misleading data etc when they knew that i was legally witholding the payments instead of simply refusing to pay and all the distress caused? Or should i back down and offer a £1 a wk knowing full well that they will continue to hound me for more - Failing that would it be wiser to possibly try one of these no win-no fee solicitors to represent me because i know that the paperwork side of things isn't a problem for me especially with all of your help and support but actually standing in front of a judge and fighting it will booger me up as i would be a nervous wreck and get all my words etc wrong.

Ok, initial panic & ramble over.

 

Anyway - First things first. The POC are as follows:

 

"The claimant is the Assignee of a debt(s) from Barclaycard (littlewoods) - ref ....... and Capital One - ref ........,

Notice of assignment having been given to the Defendant in writing. Despite demand for payment, £xxxx.xx remains due. The claimant claims £xxxx.xx and interest under s.69 County Courts Act 1984 and costs."

 

(Is it worth noting that the total amount already includes court fee and solicitors fee?) And from what i can tell i have the basic 14 days to respond. So, where do i begin?

 

Thanks as always, Mpols xxx


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for some more reading Mpols:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?159445

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?241827-Legal-Action-how-to-start-off.-IMPORTANT-IF-YOURE-BEING-SUED&highlight

 

I also happened on this. Although the statement is about a mortgage, I'm wondering if it could apply to you as well:

 

http://news.roslingking.com/?p=391


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SilverFox. Am l rite in thinking they cant just put 2 seperate accounts into one claim.


OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure but I think you may be right GM.

There are different T'c&C's for each account


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There would have to be because one is from Littlewoods and another from someone else as far as l can tell. I know there are laws on spliting claims so they cant just chase there charges then go for the balance at a later date. Like b carter does


OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR

 

Right to use one claim form to start two or more claims

 

7.3

 

A claimant may use a single claim form to start all claims which can be conveniently disposed of in the same proceedings.

These two accounts cannot possibly be dealt with "conveniently" in the same proceedings as they involve two different a/c's, OC's, T&C's, and legal status etc.etc. and each a/c is open to defence by yourself on it's own merits which may or may not reflect the legal status of the other account.

 

 

Total shambles and a good letter to the Court indicating that you are defending this claim but the nature of the claim means that you must effectually write two very different defences for the same claim should really be enough for the Court to use their case management powers to get this chucked out early doors as a breach of CPR 7.3.


As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much as I'd love to, I don't have enough time to allocate to this, but my initial advice is to seperate these into the two accounts and then ask Morgans to supply you with the deeds of Assignement for each. Check out the sales assignment document when you manage to get them and where they are heavily redacted ( Lines blanked out) come back here and we'll guide you through them. It is essential now you get together all the documents you can. Agreements, T & C's Default Notices and then you need to begin checking dates - and I mean check. Every date is important, dates served, content correct, Check when Cabot bought the debt, if they sent the hallo and goodbye letters in the same envelope, how many defaults are on your credit files, what they consist of -everything because the devil is in the detail and Cabot feck up time and time again on their documents and dates. I've heard it somewhere they allegedly create documents so check all the legal documents (Default notices etc) that they have not been Blue Petered. I'm not saying they do, but just check as part of the process and once you've got all that in place you'll be ready when they send any court documents and these documents which are heavily redacted which might have Human Rights implications. Ignore their threatograms, but take seriously any action they take as they'll probably take you to the wire before even blatant errors on their side are admitted.

 

If you need a solicitor or feel you can't handle this alone make sure you use one who understands cabot and the CCA - if you need one just shout and I'll tell you who I used.

 

I will not recommend solicitors, just point you to who I used - every case is different so make your own choices as I wouldn't want anyone coming back to me after saying it didn't work for them. It worked for me, but I'm crazy! . :madgrin:

 

Just remind Morgans that you have a big help from CAG and a little help from the Cabot Fan Club - put them on notice who they are feckin with ! :lol:


Cabot and the Cabot Fan Club Threads:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/73598-dealing-cabot-101-cabot.html

 

Legal Actions Explained for Businesses:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20492-legal-actions-explained-company.html

 

Payplan CCCS Advice:

http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/getting-out-debt/128587-info-cccs-payplan-experiences.html?highlight=Payplan

 

How to use the Forum

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

 

A click on the scales below is appreciated if my posts were helpful

Do not regard my postings or suggestions as professional advice. If in doubt seek a professional opinion.

 

PLEASE DONATE IF SUCCESSFUL - Every little helps :)

 

PLEASE, Do not Private Message me with basic questions, start your own thread and PM a link if you wish, but I will not be able to respond to all individual questions as I am very busy on numerous other things and anyway, others cannot learn from PM's. It also stifles contributions from the vast talent base this site offers from it's contributors and I'm not all that clever really! :D Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all - Ok, So have been reading up again whenever have had 5 mins over weekend (tisn't often :|) & from what i can gather -

Firstly they shouldn't have combined both acc in one claim, secondly i didn't receive a lba unless they are going to state that the template i got telling me to respond withi one month or else they would begin proceedings without further notice, acts as such, (I DID respond in time as can be seen in prev posts) thirdly their poc only mention the notice of assignment being given to me in writing, no mention of agreement/dispute etc, fourthly, the claim was not accompanied by any docs, mentioned So according to the link Fox gave me, it quotes "

 

no docs with the claim

 

ASK for them in writing (CPR 31.14)

 

then the claimant has 7 days to facilitate the request (CPR 31.15)

 

Also when asking for docs, ask also for an extension of time (CPR 15.5) as the Claimant and yourself can agree up to an extra 28 days for filing a defence

 

this should put you in a stronger position

 

If the Claimant refuses then i always make an application for an order to disclose and in breach the claim is struck out and 99.9% of the time you will get it"

 

I think i need to find/draft a letter to Morgans explaining the above & asking for all docs under cpr plus requesting more time for defence - then do another letter for the court explaining the combined accounts etc. Am i on right track please? My head just doesn't seem able to retain the info like it should regardless of how much i read :sad:

 

Andrew Thanku for your advice - I have been trying to find one of the no win-no fee companies for my area (Doncaster), but they all seem to be aimed at the 'had an accident that's not your fault' genre so would be grateful if you have any names/numbers that i might be able to use at all please? At the moment i haven't acknowledged the claim which was received sat as not too sure what i should be writing or saying yet. Also i need to send off for my updated credit files and then cross ref them i think. Am probably sounding like an abso numpty but am just trying to get things in the right order/make sense.

 

Many thanks everyone for your prompt responses. Am off to read some more. Mpols xx


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mpols I double agree with everything Andrew has told you. Re solicitors let's see how far we can get but I do know Andrew had a good one. 8-)

 

It's a lot of work for you but you may well have some of it. Just form two files and also follow Jaspar's advice re CPR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rhia, Thanks hun,

Question (s) :lol: - Would it be feasible to send a combined CPR 31.12 and CPR 16.4 (2) Request to try and get them to supply me with ALL the documents that should have been included in their POC for them to properly plead their case? Or am i barking up the wrong tree? I thought it might work because they have only mentioned the NOA in their POC and obviously my argument is that the accs have been in dis almost two years due to lack of fulfilled CCA, so i haven't ignored their demands but have legally witheld payment until correct docs appear? Also, Do i send the letter to Morgans and Cabot or just the former & Finally, do i need to write two copies with the seperate ref numbers on or just the one beings as they have combined the two acc? Actually might just be able to send the one copy thinking about it as i could add the statement that Jasper posted above possibly? And presumably i can add the request for agreeing to extend the deadline as well.

 

Hope this is making sense? Thanks, Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bumping just for if someone has time to answer please :oops:Thanking you xx ps..Miss d' t'other smilies :(


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to treat each request as a separate issue.

 

by all means make separate requests under 31.14 and Part 18, they will only send what they want to send, make sure you keep all prrofs of posting and proofs of delivery

 

when it comes time to complete the Allocation Questionnaire, you need to ask the courts to order disclosure of all of the documents they have failed to provide you with and also to replead the case in line with CPR 16

 

The POC seem to be constant, mine was virtually identical, I filed a defence on the basis of the POC and also documents they have provided to date, then had the courts order disclosure in my AQ, it's not foolproof but at least it puts them to strict proof of what they are saying and also holds them to a set deadline


Hope this helps

 

 

If you feel that this site has helped you in any way please leave a donation if you can afford to do so.

 

If you feel that have been helpful please feel free to tip the scales.

 

 

The large print giveth, but the small print taketh away. ~Tom Waits, Small Change

 

 

Please note: i am not a qualified lawyer, any advice is offered in good faith and is based on my own and others experiences and a penchant for research and a desire to help others to empower themselves

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all - Thanks for advice so far. Have sent a cpr.18 for further info, as the poc so vague with a request for extension of deadline (cpr15.5) - they should have it monday so we will go from there. Have been advised that is the sum is relatively small & under 5k that it will prob go small claims so doubt i will get help with costs which means i am likely to have to face them on me own which tbh is the only bit i dont relish the thought of. Nerves tend to get the better of me in any confrontational situation & any semblance of brain matter simply disintergrates :-( oh well - cest la vie! Will update as/when can - need to start formulating defence, although at the moment unless further info arrives it might be a bit tricky. Take care all. Thanks as always, Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Put in a good defence to the POC, then when you get the Aq, make sure you demand they produce the original documents at the hearing, then you should win, good luck


Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning everyone - received a letter - short and sweet - literally 2 lines long telling me they are in the process of responding to my part 18 request and will forward their response shortly. No mention of the part 15.5 which was to agree to more time. Will start looking at defence/getting a draft compiled this weekend - at least with the basics then can amend it to suit depending on which docs i get from them. Hope everyone is well. Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mpols following your thread with interest Cabot have lumped 3 totally different claims into one POC,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?275913-Cabot-3-claims-in-1-claim-form.&p=3158864&highlight=#post3158864


Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is what they have done you need to separate each one as they will each have different t&cs to start with as well as application forms, agreements. Cabot is beyond contempt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon folks - Hope everyone is well? Ok, seriously need to get a defence sorted now - didn't get a chance last week as had all the littlies off school poorly & literally didn't get time to pee let alone anything else (too much info? oops soz :lol:) Haven't heard or received anything else from morgans other than in a couple posts up basically acknowledging my part 18 letter. Not sure really where to start but don't really want to file an embarrassed defence unless have to. I need to address the fact that they have combined the two amounts & try to seperate those plus their poc are very vague & not received any docs yet. I dunno if this makes sense to anyone but i would kinda like to push the fact that i am disputing the paperwork not the debt as such if that will work? I have been asking for the last two yrs for the correct docs to fulfill cca plus for the acc to be returned to the oc. Any pointers right now would be very gratefully received. Am off to try & read some more. Many thanks as always, Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so now my eyes are practically bleeding, my head is thumping & i feel like crying am so dizzy from going in circles reading thread after thread - :| Pleeeeeease pretty please can someone who has the knowledge point me in the right direction for a basic defence that might relate to my case that i can ammend/add to appropriately? I'm sorry - i don't expect anyone else to 'do it all for me' but i'm just not sure where to even begin & really don't have much time left. A quick summary is as follows but not sure if am just confusing minor bits with major bits etc - aaarghhh! (Soooo not a gd day soreeeeee)

 

Claimant has combined two separate accounts - (breach of CPR.7.3)

 

Capital one - CCA requested Nov 08 Not fulfilled - Acc then sold to Cabot Nov 08

Cab were sent acc in dis letter & asked to return acc to cap one for remedy of breaches made.

Have repeated this request in answer to payment demands in same manner until claim form received.

No LBA received other than a last chance to pay & threatening legal action if no response in a month - response was sent in a month so why start proceedings immediately.

Cap one also in breach of SAR.

Claim received (combined both acc & poc vague)

No other docs received to support claim

Morgans now in breach of part 18 (further info request) & ignored part 15.5 (extension of deadline request)

 

Littlewoods - Cabot apparently bought acc Oct 07

Continued with reduced payment plan until they apparently terminated acc in Oct 08 *found cag*

CCA request

Replied eventually with pre-contractual application form with seperate t&c that did not apply at time of issue. Also received ‘representations’ of noa, etc etc.

Passed to Fire

Passed to Robinson Way

Passed to Morgans

No lba received as above.

Claim arrived- (Combined both acc & poc vague)

No other docs received to support claim.

Morgans now in breach of part 18 (further info request) & ignored part 15.5 (extension of deadline request)

 

Apologies if this is bit confusing to follow - am ust trying to break down into two seperate lists so as to know what to refer to in defence etc. Mpols x

Edited by mysticpols06
had dates wrong doh -

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping for advice please - i appreciate it is late now and am signing off to hopefully get some sleep :-( Will check in again in morn. Thanks as always & sweet dreams, Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oct 98?

 

 

After 6 years it is statuted barred!


My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Geoffrey - Thanks for your interest - My mistake - i just read my last couple posts back & i had somehow lost a whole decade haha - I think i did mention previously that i was utterly cream crackered - should had read Oct '08 etc - Am going to edit that post now rather than cause more confusion although statute barred would have been so much easier to contend with :wink: Thanks again, Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok can someone please check this and let me know if it is ok to send as a basic defence -

 

1. I, xxxxxxxxxx, am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as a defence to the claim made by xxxxxx

 

2. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the Claimant’s Particulars of Claim and put the Claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

3. The Defendant notes that the Claimant has combined two separate account sums in their particulars of claim in an attempt to conveniently wholly dispose of them in the same proceedings under CPR 7.3, however each sum involves separate accounts with their own original lender, account references, terms, conditions and legal status and can not possibly be “conveniently” disposed of in a single claim, therefore CPR 7.3 can not apply in this instance.

 

4. a)The Particulars of Claim are vague and insufficient and do not disclose an adequate statement of facts relating to or proceeding the alleged cause of action. No particulars are offered in relation to the nature of the contracts referred to, the method the Claimant calculated any outstanding sums due, or any default notices issued or any other matters necessary to substantiate the Claimant's claim.

b) A copy of the purported 'assignment' that the Claimant cites in the Particulars of Claim, and which appears to form the basis upon which these proceedings have been brought, has not been served attached to the claim form or provided for clarification.

5. The Claimant did not send a letter before action as required under the Pre-Action Protocols.

 

6. The Claimant has so far failed to disclose and clarify appropriate information to support the Particulars of Claim, requested pursuant to CPR 18, which leaves the Defendant at a disadvantage and unable to plead effectively or at all. Even if the Defendant were able to plead they should be allowed to plead effectively to each account on its’ own merit. The Defendant is embarrassed in pleading to the Claim as it stands.

 

7. The Claimant has not provided any documents to support the particulars of claim.

 

8. The Defendant did request in writing an extension of deadline for filing a defence pursuant to CPR 15.5, however the Claimant has not, thus far acknowledged or agreed to the request which in turn has also put the Defendant at a disadvantage for filing a defence.

 

9. The Defendant denies that they are indebted to the Claimant for the sum of £xxxx, including costs and puts the Claimant to strict proof of this sum.

 

10. As the Claimant has not provided proof of the debt or the sums claimed the Defendant denies the Claimants claim for interest pursuant to s.69 of the county court Act 1984.

 

AND the Defendant;

 

11. Seeks an order that the Claimant’s action is struck out under CPR 3.4.2 (a), or otherwise dismissed because the claimant has breached CPR 7.3, has failed to support their Particulars of Claim with the relevant documentation and on the grounds that any claim cannot succeed and that the Claimant do pay the Defendant’s costs incurred in defending this action.

Edited by mysticpols06
edited wording in point 5,6 & 10

'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Rhia - That is the thread i contrated on most the last couple days. I will add some points from that Piglands defence to what i have drafted above. Can you (or anyone) please yay or nay what i have so far? Am really trying to get this sorted today if poss as i wont be around the next few days while the kiddies are off school. Mpols x


'Confidence grows & heartbeat slows to a steady stronger beat, as each member unites, against DCA fights & we all sail aboard the CAG fleet!' :rolleyes:

:pKeep smiling peeps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...