Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Actionfraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
    • It'll be something to the effect of:  "I am in receipt of your letter before claim.  I was awaiting a passenger as a licensed cab driver on the Locton estate who subsequently cancelled the pickup after me waiting a while and will fight this in the small claims court if necessary. Plus I have friends who are experts in contractual law and make it their business to defeat these spurious PPC claims.  So issue the claim form or go forth and multiply, up to you"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Michael v Bank of Scotland/Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4677 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello my names Michael, I think this site is fantastic and I have learnt a lot from it but I’m a bit stuck with my situation and would be really grateful for any advice you good people could give me.

Michael v Bank of Scotland/Halifax

 

I opened my BoS credit card account in 1997

I had a messy divorced in the early 2000s and was left with over £20,000 debt.

I defaulted on the account and went onto a repayment plan.

Around 2005 I got the balance to around £2000 and asked if I could have another card which they sent out to me and 3 years (and many credit limit increases) later I stupidly got in debt again.

I started paying £35 a month and they were happy enough with that.

In Dec 2009 I requested my Consumer Credit Agreement and received a copy of my application form and a reconstituted version of my credit agreement.

I requested my SAR, sent a reminder, letter before action and reported them to the ICO and received no paperwork at all from Bos.

I was paying £35 a month but I stopped paying in May 2010 and haven’t received any letters from Bos asking why.

I received a letter a couple of days ago from BoS saying although they haven’t changed their charging policy, to resolve this complaint they are will to refund the remaining balance of the charges £193.56.

They have also sent a credit card statement with £3,762

They go on to say that although the account is now closed the outstanding balance is with collections and the money will go to reduce the amount owed.

I send all my correspondence recorded delivery and keep copies of everything.

I would really like to get the debt removed from my credit file as it’s the only bad thing on there.

I have asked Experian to remove it but they haven’t yet.

I am unsure of how to proceed and would love to hear from you guys

Thanks Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got statements for the £3762 outstanding ?

If so you need to get copies of them,since there is a strong possibility that there will be charges and interest on those charges as forming part of this.

Did the ICO uphold against BOS?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Martin, Thanks for replying

 

I only have the one statement that BoS sent me a couple of days ago which shows £3,762.68.

I had had been paying £35 a month for around 1 and a half years and in that time they have frozen the interest (I stopped paying this in may which was when the 40 day had ran out)

 

I had not heard from the ICO so I rang them and they gave me my reference number and told me someone would look at my case but I havent actually heard anything since.

 

I'm really unsure what my next step would be

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that they agreed to refund charges of £193.56 which they have used in partial set off towards alleged arrears.

So did you request a refund of charges ?

Banks are of course still refunding charges taken from card accounts-although in most cases only £12.00 per charge.

I would think that most of your charges were before late 2006/2007 so before the OFT announced that £12 was deemed acceptable.Its likely that your charges would have been £28-£35 per default.

 

What you need to do is to get copy statements to show how the figure of £3762 .68 is calculated.

You should also get copies of the payments made.

The copy statements are available under a SAR with the fee of £10.

These should also be showing any payments that you have made.

It is difficult for you to deny any liability to any debt here since you WAS paying £35 per month.

If you are challenging the arrears on account of the fact that you do not agree with the existing balance,then you need these statements.

 

When you sent the SAR to BOS did you include the fee ?

How was it sent ?

Did you specify what you wanted ?

How long ago did you send it ?

 

If BOS did not comply,then you need to send a letter demanding they comply-this is available in the CAG library.

 

The ICO would want to see any response in writing from BOS,and copies of letters from you,if they are to look at your complaint.

 

I assume that you stopped the payments of £35 because they did not comply with your request under the CCA ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin,

Thank you for you reply

 

I started the SAR in May 2010 and used the templates from money saving expert site, giving Bank of Scotland the allowed time to respond.

every letter was send recorded delivery and I have all the signatures.

Because I did not know how much money I should have claimed I sent the standard SAR request, Reminder and Letter before action.

I opted for claim unknown amount ;/

 

You are correct, Bank of Scotland did not respond to my SAR request.

I have received the letter from them a couple of days ago stating they would refund the £193.35 but I think this is a responce from my query with experian when I asked to have the default removed from my credit file.

Thanks again for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...