Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

APEX Credit Mngt Returned My Cheque!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

 

This is laughable but wondered if anyone had some advice.

 

I had a letter from my old bank (Shatwest) saying that i hadnt paid off my overdraft before i closed my account, I didnt contest it, i was aware there was a figure to pay.

 

They sent me out a form to complete with the usual statement of affairs etc, the figure was 145 quid, I offered wem pro rata £20 a month, Sent off first payment and told em i was very sorry i would pay it off asap.

 

Couple of weeks later i gets a letter demanding a different amount (155) from me regarding my natwest overdraft. No letter from shatwest, account numbers were slightly different on both letters.

 

I wrote to shatwest requesting a reponse from my previous offer to them and why they had not made me aware of the situation being passed to a debt collector...

 

They sent me back a stock response, telling me that my debt was no longer in there hands and any correspondance was to be between myselves and Apex.

 

So, I sent another offer letter to Apex, asked for the ammounts and account number to be ammended as per shatwest's figures and to get back to me.

 

I get a letter back from Apex refusing to accept my terms, Asked me to call them to discuss it.

 

Now i know not to engage these blood suckers on the phone so i sent them another letter, Pointing out the OFT guidelines on harrasing debtors and requesting unreasonably large instalments asking them to reconsider my ofer and this time including a cheque for £30. ( so ive now offered to pay off around a third of the debt in about 2 months between shatwest and apex)

 

I get a letter today from my current bank, Inside it says we enclose a cheque that has been passed to us by a third party... and a small hand written note from apex insid with DEBT COLLECTION written all over it , it says we have been unable to allocate this cheque, please pass it back to your customer and ask them to quote an apex reference number, name and address.

 

Now, Im laughing as i type this but in fairness its getting on my nerves now. Im not refusing to pay them, im not being unreasonable. Why are they refusing my money?

 

Any thoughts?

 

Simon

x:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get a letter today from my current bank, Inside it says we enclose a cheque that has been passed to us by a third party... and a small hand written note from apex insid with debt collection written all over it , it says we have been unable to allocate this cheque, please pass it back to your customer and ask them to quote an apex reference number, name and address.
Complain to Trading Standards via Consumer Direct http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact they are deliberately trying to embarrass you by involving your bank when they have your contact details & are flouting OFT gudelines.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ave ad enough quite frankly. These people think that they can do what they like.

 

Ive sent them this > With a copy to NATWEST too..

 

These companies are getting worse.. I can see how they drive people to do silly things to themselves.

 

Complaints Manager

Apex Credit Management

Apex House,

27 Arden Street,

Stratford Upon Avon,

CV37 6NW

Dear Sirs,

 

I write this letter firstly with regret for having to yet again contact you, and with a heavy heart that you have taken every opportunity to make this transaction as difficult and upsetting for me as possible.

May I firstly draw your attention to your website and your words:

At Apex Credit Management we pride ourselves on our ethical approach to credit management. Our highly trained UK based team are available to talk you through your credit problems and to work with you to establish suitable payment solutions.

WE WON’T JUDGE YOU

WE WON'T APPLY UNDUE PRESSURE

WE WILL WORK WITH YOU TO UNDERSTAND YOUR CIRCUMSTANCES

I am giving you the opportunity to back up your words today.

I have been advised by the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) to contact you in the first instance regarding any official complaint and please take this letter as that initial contact.

I would very much like to be able to come to a working solution with yourselves without further unnecessary harassment.

I have now received back my cheque for 30.00GBP which I sent to you on the 22nd September including a letter asking you to reconsider the terms of my offer to yourselves based upon my personal circumstances and a pro rata offer to yourselves which I felt fair given the figure owed.

  

You have returned my cheque via **** bank to me and they have included your hand written note stating that you have not been able to allocate it, please return it with a name and address attached.

This is unacceptable behaviour

The cheque was sent with a letter fully outlining my name, Your reference number and my address. You also have my details on record from previous correspondence, there was no reason to involve my current banking provider and what you have done is a breach of the data protection act 1998.

I would firstly like to know why you are taking it upon yourselves to cause me so much trouble over a relatively small amount of debt which I have never refuted.

I would also like to know why you are refusing to accept payment from me.

I would like to know why you continue to demand a figure different to the original demand from Natwest plc

And finally I would like to know why you think it is acceptable to use my data in such a way to bring my good name into ill repute with my current banking establishment.

As per the FOS guidelines you have 8 weeks to resolve this matter. If after 8 weeks I have not got a satisfactory outcome to these problems then this complaint will be passed to the FOS.

 

A copy of this letter has also been sent to the original creditor for their information.

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Utter utter XXXXX, the FOS is sick to the back teeth of the banking industry and all the complaints they have been receiving, I notice that my bank is top of the leader board for complaints, probably because most of them are mine! As well as the usual OFT/TS complaints local MP too!!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well

 

I dont know if this is a result or what but it appear Me 1 Apex 0...

 

Letter from Natwest this morning, Complaints department have finally got to the copy of the original letter i sent to Apex demanding to know why they wont accept my offer/money and why they are claiming a different amount from natwest. Long and short of it, theyve recalled the account from Apex and closed my account with no further repayment required as a gesture of goodwill :)

 

Im flaberghasted!

 

I take back everything Ive ever said about Natwest lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. That was to easy IMO but a win is a win. BB. I think a whole load of those complaints are from my FIL the fos has ruled they have to pay back my FIL 9.5k for PPI missold but nearly 1 year on they have not paid him. They dont intend on either IMO the fos keep adding interest to it but thats it. FIL cant afford to take it to courts as hes getting no money.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...