Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not sure about the lease read through all the documents i have and couldnt find anything about parking. Contacted the management Office to get a copy sent to me. When i complained to them about the ticket they told me to appeal so they clearly don't care.      and yes it's a gated underground parking area with key fob entry. 
    • The coronavirus pandemic has thrown many countries into recession - but what exactly is it and how could it affect you? View the full article
    • Oh and before bed   Officially leaked statements about a PHE report claiming that a UK study will say there is little evidence of children transmitting Covid.   Leakers stats look impressive until you realise he's on Johnson's SAGE so makes you think - huh - hows that then when all the science I've seen says different, and there are a number of reports of spreads in schools across the world from schools that had opened.   Then, little as the information 'leaked' is, you see   "largest studies in the world on coronavirus in schools" and then "The study was carried out in 100 institutions in the UK and is expected to be published later this year. About 20,000 pupils and teachers in 100 schools across England were tested to monitor the spread of the disease up to the end of the summer term – which runs from April-July in Britain."   Then you click. That averages 200 pupils and staff per 'institution' checked We dont know what these institutions are, but I think over 200 is the average for infants schools. Other schools tend to be FAR larger. Did they test everyone at each institution, or just some ??? we don't know yet - they are choosing not to leak that - Wonder why?   We currently understand that younger children (pre teenage) seem to present few/less symptoms  (statistically) but large increases in teenager covid has been reported as lockdowns ease and they start to meet more.   I know my OH's grandson (mother a nurse) has remained at school in classes one third or less that normal, with the majority of kids having front line worker parents - so well aware of the discipline and hygiene necessary. We know the schools maintain distancing, monitoring and maintenance which would be IMPOSSIBLE in normal class sizes.   So in a lock down situation, with class sizes significantly lower than normal (highly aware front-line workers kids mainly), increased distancing and cleaning made possible by SIGNIFICANTLY smaller class sizes - Has maybe resulted in no great evidence of covid spread perhaps?   Well Whoopy do. Lets ramp the class sizes back up to 30+ and see what happens ..     Lets let the mail lead the way Coronavirus infection rates are rising in ALL age groups under 65, Public Health England data shows with biggest surge in under-fives which 'should be watched very carefully' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8615423/Coronavirus-infection-rates-rising-age-groups-65-Public-Health-England-data-shows.html     and the ONS stats showing how similar the stats are (a statistically significant  difference can be very little actual difference)   https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19infectionsinthecommunityinengland/july2020     Notes: These statistics refer to infections reported in the community, by which we mean private households. These figures exclude infections reported in hospitals, care homes or other institutional settings.  
    • i understand and agree you should write a formal letter of complaint about the email by royal mail.   i also think you should totally dispute the arrears balance, esp as it goes back so long   send them an sar and add to the text in it that you want statements/bills dating back to the gb energy a/c.
    • When you see the reports coming out that serco was involved from the earliest stages apparently to give expertise   and that resulted in 18 million plus people coming back into the UK untested from hotspots .. and then even the general advice to self isolate after they had travelled across the UK home being withdrawn in the run-up to the lock down   That went well says cummings      
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
manaquin

Buying a vehicle - is my seller a dealer/private seller

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3595 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

In short, Im buying a 2007 reg scooter. Now the seller I think is trading as a business, has a web site etc, but he runs it from home?

 

Not that a person cant be registered as a business and trade from home, but my question is if things go wrong, how am I covered or what cover do I have as I believe its different it the seller is private or is a dealer?

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trader running from home is in many ways better than a trader running from rented garage or yard lock up. The dealer is less likely to run away!

 

Makes no difference as far as your protection and rights, though home operated businesses often do not know, understand or agree with the law. They have no choice, but it often has to be forced upon them. You are protected under the SOGA.

 

If things go very wrong, you can sue the dealer. If that is a sole trader, then you sue the person you bought it from./ If it is a Ltd company you sue them. Ltd companies have a habit of folding once sued.

 

Personally, buying a bike? I would pay extra and buy from a main agent. They don't like a bad name and will usually cave in when the law is pout to them correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... my question is if things go wrong, how am I covered or what cover do I have as I believe its different it the seller is private or is a dealer?

 

 

 

A business includes—

 

(a) a professional practice;

(b) any other undertaking carried on for gain or reward;

© any undertaking in the course of which goods or services are supplied otherwise than free of charge.

 

Enterprise Act, Section 210 (Enforcement of certain consumer legislation)

 

:shock:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

woo! purpled!

 

I think we have most of them with this one, an irrelevant statement in answer to a question that wasn't asked and incorrectly citing statute. All we are missing is a reference to the DSRs...

 

To the OP - ignore perpy. He's a bit daft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.. my question is if things go wrong, how am I covered or what cover do I have as I believe its different it the seller is private or is a dealer?

 

---------

 

The rights of a consumer and the obligations of a supplier are covered above all else by Community (European Union) directives which in turn are implemented by the relevant UK statutes.

 

Part 8 of the Enterprise Act. therefore relates by way of section 212(4) which provides that "References to a listed Directive [or to a listed Regulation] must be construed in accordance with section 210".

 

Schedule 13 of the Act lists the relevant EU legislation.

 

The Enterprise Act 2002 (Part 8 Community Infringements Specified UK Laws) Order 2003 lists the UK legislation that the definition provided by section 210 thus applies to.

 

Part 8 of the Act binds the Crown.

 

Enforcement officers and the civil courts alike are therefore bound to construe in accordance, like it or not.

 

8-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear. Every site has one doesn't it?

 

Let me explain for the OP in simple terms then. If a private seller, you have no protection at all. if a business you have full SOGA protection whether they are a Ltd company or not and whether they trade from business premises, lock up yard, their home or a pub car park. Private= bad news, Trader = good nes as far as your rights are concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah.... we have perpy. He's a lot daft. We're never really sure what he's talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me explain for the OP in simple terms then. ......

 

 

As a matter of fact, the terms of The Sale of Goods Act [section 1] are simple enough as they stand, for all to see for themselves if so they please:

 

1 Contracts to which Act applies

 

(1) This Act applies to contracts of sale of goods made on or after (but not to those made before) 1 January 1894.

 

:!:

 

The only part of the Act where "business" appears is Section 14 on the "Implied terms about quality or fitness", which refers to the "course of a business".

 

The Act in general applies to any legitimate contract of sale, business private or otherwise, so long as the deal is legal; the parties own the right to contract.

 

8-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone else wonder if perpys keyboard has any other keys than CTRL, V and C?


Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it has a 'paste bull****' button. Perhaps some sort of keyboard shortcut?

 

The point above about 'business' only appearing in s14, perhaps proves this point...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just for our friend Perplexity. This has nothing to do with the OPs question either. Just as useful as your contribution and probably more amusing.

 

62

 

Cycle Tracks. These are normally located away from the road, but may occasionally be found alongside footpaths or pavements. Cyclists and pedestrians may be segregated or they may share the same space (unsegregated). When using segregated tracks you MUST keep to the side intended for cyclists as the pedestrian side remains a pavement or footpath. Take care when passing pedestrians, especially children, older or disabled people, and allow them plenty of room. Always be prepared to slow down and stop if necessary. Take care near road junctions as you may have difficulty seeing other road users, who might not notice you.

 

[Law HA 1835 sect 72]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Experience is the proof.

 

If you rather intend to contest a legal action on the strength of the myth that the law does not apply to a "private" contract you are going to lose (so long as there's a proof of the contract), nor is an online sale private (with a seller's terms to apply to all transactions), nor is this a new idea.

 

The ruse was already tried, over and over again since the Sale of Goods Act came to force and always to the same effect. The cause got as far as the Court of Appeal in 1999 for instance and they threw it out, recommending a broader approach to the term "in the course of business". [Stevenson v Rogers [1999] 1 All ER 613]

 

From there on, the more you resort to personal abuse the more the point is proved: If you happened to know of a legal precedent or statutory provision to a different effect it should rather be a simple task to declare the evidence.

 

You don't because you don't. A statutory provision or precedent to such an effect does not exist.

 

Judges are not so keen to be put out of business by dodgy individuals of the opinion that the law should not apply. The law of the United Kingdom is common to all, believe it or not.

 

:roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

remember that the statutory entitlement of quality and fitness for purpose only applies when buying from someone who is ‘acting in the course of a business’ i.e a second-hand car dealer. You do not have any legal recourse as regards quality where you are buying through an individual who is selling an item as a one-off private sale (although they must have legal title and it must be as described in the advert).

 

click here

Edited by labrat
added link

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
remember that the statutory entitlement of quality and fitness for purpose only applies when buying from someone who is ‘acting in the course of a business’ i.e a second-hand caccuffoccar dealer. You do not have any legal recourse as regards quality where you are buying through an individual who is selling an item as a one-off private sale (although they must have legal title and it must be as described in the advert).

 

click here

 

 

It would have been that much wiser to study the case I cited: Stevenson v Rogers [1999] 1 All ER 613]

 

 

The sale in question was precisely a one-off private sale, of a fishing boat. The terms were arranged with the buyer in private on a one-off basis by a fisherman whose usual line of business was not to sell boats, nor anything else except for fish.

 

The seller therefore expected to win the argument but lost and could just as well have been the "private" seller of a car that was previously used for a business purpose.

 

Section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act was especially held to apply. The boat that he sold should be fit for purpose.

 

:!:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perplex, hoisted by your own petard I feel.

 

On the basis of the approach taken in Stevenson v Rogers, as long as a sale is even incidental to the seller's business, and not a 'purely private sale', it should be in the course of a business for the purposes of s14(2), and that is in keeping with the legislative history of the subsection.

 

The case you have cited was where the sale was incidental to the sellers business.

 

Therefore your argument that SOGA applies to all private sales holds no water, as EXPLICITLY stated by the court in the case you have cited.


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and I also see that the case made no reference to the "Enterprise Act" that you love to troll out every other post.


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh and I also see that the case made no reference to the "Enterprise Act" that you love to troll out every other post.

 

Really?

 

It should not be so much of a surprise that the High Court ruling of 1999 failed to mention The Enterprise Act 2002, which came into force on the 1st April 2004.

 

Part 8 of the Enterprise Act therefore followed from and supersedes the precedent of Stevenson v Rogers, to clarify the issue once and for all.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair point on the dates - shame you missed the important point, that the case you have cited to back up your point is actually at loggerheads with your perspective.


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P.S.

 

Therefore your argument that SOGA applies to all private sales holds no water, as EXPLICITLY stated by the court in the case you have cited.

 

---

 

It was never an argument of mine that the Sale of Goods Act applies to all private sales. To the contrary, I had already pointed out that the Act in general applies to any legitimate contract of sale (since 1 January 1894) so long as the deal is legal.

 

Because of Section 3 of the Act the parties to a contract must own the capacity to buy and sell.

 

The Act confers no right for instance with regard to the purchase of stolen goods. If you therefore prefer to conclude a contract of sale in private, this is a risk you take.

 

8)

 

PPS:

 

It should also be pointed out that a sale need not so much as take place before the consumer protection legislation applies.

 

Some parts (e.g. The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations) may apply before a contract is concluded.

 

-----

Edited by perplexity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was never an argument of mine that the Sale of Goods Act applies to all private sales. To the contrary, I had already pointed out that the Act in general applies to any legitimate contract of sale (since 1 January 1894) so long as the deal is legal.

 

Perhaps not in this thread....you have in the past though.

 

You have obviously changed your opinion I see?


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Perhaps not in this thread....you have in the past though.

 

You have obviously changed your opinion I see?

 

:roll:

 

Acts of Parliament are not my opinions. I am not the author of the legislation.

 

------------

 

Were it to be seen, at least, that 1999 preceded 2002 there could then be as much as that to discuss.

 

Otherwise, if a case goes to court, the argument of a buyer need not so much as hold water. In order to be excepted from the consumer protection legislation it falls to the seller to prove the claim, not to a buyer to prove a law.

 

8)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Acts of Parliament are not my opinions. I am not the author of the legislation.

 

Agreed. So why DID you change your opinion?

 

Were it to be seen, at least, that 1999 preceded 2002 there could then be as much as that to discuss.

 

Otherwise, if a case goes to court, the argument of a buyer need not so much as hold water. In order to be excepted from the consumer protection legislation it falls to the seller to prove the claim, not to a buyer to prove a law.

 

Care to produce case law which references your standpoint then, since the "Enterprise Act"?


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, although an act of parliament isnt an opinion, interpretation of it certainly is. Otherwise, there would be no need for lawyers. This is especially the case in the slapdash way in which you refer to definitions in different acts of parliament as if they apply across the acts - this is not the case as you should well know.


7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Agreed. So why DID you change your opinion?

 

Care to produce case law which references your standpoint then, since the "Enterprise Act"?

 

 

I see no reason to refer to a straw man argument instead of the law.

 

The Law requires that "References to a listed Directive or to a listed Regulation must be construed in accordance with section 210", a definition of a business thus provided, amending the consumer protection legislation in order to save a judge or an enforcement officer from the bother.

 

Every Act is a public Act to be judicially noticed as such, unless the contrary is expressly provided by the Act. The upshot is thus that a judge need not so much as oblige himself to hear an argument as to how to construe the terms, let alone the chance to appeal a point of law.

 

Part 8 of the Enterprise Act binds the Crown, which is to say that an opinion of the Monarch should so much as count, let alone the rest of us.

 

Those are the terms of the law. If you don't like it, take it up with your MP or MEP. It is their responsibility, not mine.

 

 

:!:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...