Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver.  (Although earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.  I don't clearly understand it, but legal advice was something to do with the role the receiver has acting as an agent for the borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against the receiver ???).  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate app for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council tax arrears-summons issued-advice please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4670 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a question if anyone can help.

I have recently received a court summons for unpaid council tax.

of course tax must now be paid in full with costs.

If i happen to just start paying a little bit which is the likely outcome can a liability order still be issued ?

If so how long could it be before a possible prison sentence ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

You still have time to try and make an arrangement with the Council even before the hearing.

If you can do this it will save you costs.

However much is down to whether they agree with your offer.

Prison sentences are only used as a last resort,in fact where there is a clear indication that the account holder refuses to pay,and all recovery efforts are exhausted.

I suggest you contact the Council ASAP and make an offer of payment and arrangement.

Will move your thread from here.

Keep us posted.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also ask for cost to be removed as they have no right to add them, only the magistrtaes court have the power to do that!

:grin:

:wink::)I am not an expert, I just blunder through life!:):wink::D

 

If information is power, then the web is a WMD!

Power to the people.

 

Regards

 

d0ggsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also ask for cost to be removed as they have no right to add them, only the magistrtaes court have the power to do that!

 

The adding of costs is quite legal and is covered in the appropriate statutory instrument (reg 84 of the council tax (administration and enforcement) regs 1992).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the costs will be added to any arrears.

The costs can vary anywhere between £60 and £100.

I did a freedom of information request asking to see the breakdown of the costs.

They put these cases in front of the Courts in blocks and I learned that they actually only pay the Court a couple of quid per application for liability order.

 

The only way to avoid the costs is to make arrangement before the hearing (but not at the last minute)

The only other way is if its discovered later that the charges were wrong-in which case the costs would be taken off the main arrears-I know this because it happened with me.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The adding of costs is quite legal and is covered in the appropriate statutory instrument (reg 84 of the council tax (administration and enforcement) regs 1992).

 

 

the adding of costs is legal however it is at the magistrates disgression, not the council. i fought this in court and won as i had paid my bill but refused to pay the costs they had added. i rang and gave them the opportunity to drop these costs but they declined. they told me i had to pay the cost of going to court so that i wouldn't have to go to court. costs are discussed between the council and the court before you receive your bill and set then, however they should not be applied to your bill until the court awards the liability order, not at the point the summons is sent as most if not all councils seem to be doing. the point is not that costs are legal its the timing of them being applied.

:grin:

:wink::)I am not an expert, I just blunder through life!:):wink::D

 

If information is power, then the web is a WMD!

Power to the people.

 

Regards

 

d0ggsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

"they told me i had to pay the cost of going to court so that i wouldn't have to go to court."

 

Crazy....and if you paid your arrears off before the liability order-then there NO liability order is there...

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was the point. i had got behind at xmas but knew i would be on time with last 2 payments. they wouldn't accept. the costs they can add are only those reasonably incurred upto that point, however they add the whole lot on and that is the point that shouldn't be happening. they don't have the power just the arrogance

:grin:

:wink::)I am not an expert, I just blunder through life!:):wink::D

 

If information is power, then the web is a WMD!

Power to the people.

 

Regards

 

d0ggsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want to laugh check this, in court not only were they trying to get the costs added (approx. £35 - £40), they also tried to add another £16 on for my arrogance at challenging them in court :lol:

:grin:

:wink::)I am not an expert, I just blunder through life!:):wink::D

 

If information is power, then the web is a WMD!

Power to the people.

 

Regards

 

d0ggsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my FOI request to my local Council-they arrive at fixed costs of £60 per L/0 by adding up admin costs/letters/stationary etc then divide this by xxx account holders.

 

I will try to find it and post it up.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question if anyone can help.

I have recently received a court summons for unpaid council tax.

of course tax must now be paid in full with costs.

If i happen to just start paying a little bit which is the likely outcome can a liability order still be issued ?

If so how long could it be before a possible prison sentence ?

A liability order will be issued if the whole balance isn't paid before the court date. If you aren't able to do that then you need to let it go to court, the council will obtain a liability order and then you should call them up and make an arrangement to pay it off. And prison for non-payment is a last resort, extremely rare, and only really occurs when people refuse to pay, not when they can't pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i had to fight this, this site was invaluable. try it

 

ww.isitfair.co.uk

 

the info there all checked out when cross referenced, and they beat my LO for me. and don't worry about a liability order being awarded as it is just a step the council have to take before it can start any kind of recovery, it has no effect on credit rating and won't show up anywhere in the future (unless you want to be a jp).

:grin:

:wink::)I am not an expert, I just blunder through life!:):wink::D

 

If information is power, then the web is a WMD!

Power to the people.

 

Regards

 

d0ggsb

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...