Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescot dodging CCA request


mlord
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4837 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

There are ways of working with your debts that does not involve assisiting companies that use threats and intimidation as their first line of "working" with a debtor to clear their debts.

 

If these DCA's actually tried to "work" with a debtor then they would find that they would get a greater return on their efforts, BUT they dont or wont work this way, so I for one would never advise a poster to submit an I&E to these people

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are ways of working with your debts that does not involve assisiting companies that use threats and intimidation as their first line of "working" with a debtor to clear their debts.

 

If these DCA's actually tried to "work" with a debtor then they would find that they would get a greater return on their efforts, BUT they dont or wont work this way, so I for one would never advise a poster to submit an I&E to these people

 

 

PGH , as I'm sure you know you are very much in a majority taking that view on this site. However, we all have our opinions. I've supplied IE sheets to carefully selected creditors this year and managed to get just over £15000 of debt written off, so something has worked. If others achieve the same or better results a different way, great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello again everyone,

 

Such an amazing response from you guys, unfortunately not from Wescot :( Another letter brought up thoughts that they dont communicate between each other and whoever gets my letters doesnt check previous correspondence whatsoever.

Ive decided to send them IE sheet, very honest figures and proof of them on request but few days ago I got a reply :

 

'We have previously advised you that one of the actions we were considering on your account was a Door Step Collection Visit to your home address to recover the outstanding balance.

As we know of no genuine reason why you have failed to repay the outstanding balance, instructions will now be provided to our agent to make an appointment to visit you.

You have a final opportunity to avoid referral to a DSC Agent by phoning us to agree a suitable method of repayment IMMEDIATELY. '

 

Should I send them another IE sheets ? I dont want a door step collection agent (like I would have anything to take from), please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why oh why does everyone think that their puerile threats of collecting doorsteps should automatically mean 'panic mode!'

It doesn't far from it, not only are they unqualified and will be committing a tort of trespass should they decide to foolishly turn up on your doorstep, but it is YOUR property, YOU say who comes & visits, NOT some immature bully boy outfit who's methods of extorting money by intimidation are intrinsically flawed, and should be seen as 'extortion by intimidation'.

 

If some knuckle head does grace your doorstep tell them to foxtrot oscar, they have exactly 10 seconds to get off your property or you'll call the Police, if they try to call your bluff, with the usual 'go on then' shut the door and ring the Police 999, and report that there is someone on your property who won't leave when told to and you believe they will cause a breach of the peace.

 

There is NOTHING wetcloths can do, except send out intimidating threat letters, ALL of which should be copied and sent to the OFT&TS via consumer direct, these vultures have blood on their hands and I am amazed that they are still as bolshy as ever, least of all still working in the corrupt industry.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-484772/Grandmother-terrorised-death-bank-wrongly-hounded-16-000.html

 

Save your money, OR send this 2nd class and obtain proof of posting, and print a copy off and keep it by your front door if they decide to send one of their undesirables round....V.unlikely.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?410-LETTER-USED-WHEN-A-DCA-THREATENS-A-DOORSTEP-VISIT

 

They are seriously ZERO to worry about, they are NOT bailiffs, they have NO legal training or qualifications to even be on anyone's doorstep, least of all make childish threats that they can do so.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Collecting doorsteps" rofl.gif

 

I know, you would have thought by now they could have dreamed up a better threat than that!, Derrr! Were in 2011, not 1911.....

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...