Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC Here We Go !?


martinsimon1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I did my first letter to HSBC on the 14th March 2006, they responded with the standard 1st letter stating that they are looking into matters and will contact me with a full response as soon as they have completed their investigations. They also included a copy of their leaflet that explains how their matters are dealt with. This letter was pp'd on behalf of David L Johnson who seems to be the Customer Service Officer.

Looked on this site and found out that this is a standard letter, so i thought i will wait until the 14 days are through and then take the 2nd step. I received a 2nd letter today which also seems to be standard, it says that they thank me for my letter that requested a refund of all my bank charges since March 2003 (which totals £1308.10) it says that the bank does not agree with my contention that the charges are unlawful and are therefore unenforceable. it says that the contract between the bank and its customers is governed by their personal banking terms and conditions. It says that i should take note of clause 7.11 in section 2. It finishes saying that i will not be happy with the outcome of the letter and if i am not satisfied i should refer my complaint to the financial ombudsman service, as this is their final response on this matter.

What now, should i carry on with this claim? Is this the correct time to contact the moneyclaim site? if so is this when i calculate my claim with 8%? what is the chance of me succeeding with this claim? and what re the chances with the bank closing my account? Any response will be greatly appreciated as i'm a bit confused, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, you now send them the letter before action, which gives them another 14 days to pay up.

 

After that letter, and only after that do you lodge a claim at MCOL.

 

Please keep us updated. Good luck.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waioting for a reply from HSBC regarding my 2nd letter, got my statement for this month and they are going to charge me £125.00 this month, it's ridiculous!!!! I haven't included this amount in the amount i am claiming back, can i add it on later???

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, had my 3rd letter back from HSBC (Phil Beaumont) it reads as follows:

 

Dear Mr XXXXXXX

 

Ref: XXXXXXXXXX

 

thank you for your further letter

i can confirm that the bank's position has been clearly stated in our letter dated 27 march 2006. this letter constituted our final response with regard to this matter and advised that should you remain unsatisfied you have the option to refer to the financial ombudsman service as detailed in the leaflet provided.

 

yours sincerely

 

phil beaumont

senior service quality officer

 

Well fancy that another standard response, do i still wait the 14 days or do i start the moneyclaim now???

 

thanks for any responses as i'm getting a bit confused as nobody else i've read about seems to have received this letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Right the 14 days is up from the 2nd letter, i am going to download and fill in the 8% spreadsheet, there is just a couple of things i need to clear up before i submit my claim. I understand that i can claim for going over my overdraft fees, can i also claim against the interest they charge me at tha same time? also temporary overdraft limit fees of £20.00 every time they set up a temporary overdraft? also charges for recalling a standing order? also stopped cheque charges, i'm hoping somebody can clear this up for me, i'm also wondering whether or not i should open up a 2nd account??? thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right the 14 days is up from the 2nd letter, i am going to download and fill in the 8% spreadsheet, there is just a couple of things i need to clear up before i submit my claim. I understand that i can claim for going over my overdraft fees, can i also claim against the interest they charge me at tha same time? also temporary overdraft limit fees of £20.00 every time they set up a temporary overdraft? also charges for recalling a standing order? also stopped cheque charges, i'm hoping somebody can clear this up for me, i'm also wondering whether or not i should open up a 2nd account??? thanks for any help

 

I am pretty sure not the temporary overdraft limit fees of £20, because that is a facility you have requested! Therefor you will of agreed to the £20 fee before they gave you the overdraft, so thats a verbal contract that you agree with the fee!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right the 14 days is up from the 2nd letter, i am going to download and fill in the 8% spreadsheet, there is just a couple of things i need to clear up before i submit my claim. I understand that i can claim for going over my overdraft fees, can i also claim against the interest they charge me at tha same time? also temporary overdraft limit fees of £20.00 every time they set up a temporary overdraft? also charges for recalling a standing order? also stopped cheque charges, i'm hoping somebody can clear this up for me, i'm also wondering whether or not i should open up a 2nd account??? thanks for any help

 

Charges for stopping a cheque - i.e if you write a cheque, then for whatever reason don't want them to pay the cheque, and you arrange for it to be stopped...

 

if this is what you mean, then no, you can't reclaim this as it is a charge for a service.

 

If however you mean the charge for when they bounce a cheque (i.e don't give the payee the money) then yes, you can.

 

Same applies for the standing orders fee.

 

The charge for arranging an overdraft cannot be reclaimed as it is a charge for a service.

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right the 14 days are over so i am busy with my moneyclaim, Wow i didn't realise these things could be so confusing, i have removed the temporary overdraft set up fees and included my latest fee and started with my claim, now two problems, 1) i can't get the details of the claim below 25 lines (it has to be 24 to go through) and i want to make sure it is ok. here it is

 

I have a contract with HSBC dated March 2003

and which is conducted on their standard

terms and conditions. I am claiming the

return of money taken by HSBC in the way of

charges over the last 03 years plus the

interest they have levied on those charges.

The Bank's charges are a disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable as they

are contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair(Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify their

charges but they have declined to do so.The

claimant claims interest under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8%

a year from March 2003 to 19-04-2006 of

£112.32 and also interest at the same rate

up to the date of judgment or earlier

payment at a daily rate of 0.022%.

 

please let me know if this is ok, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks fine to me

  • Confused 1

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have contract with HSBC dated March 2003,

which is conducted on their standard

terms and conditions. Am claiming

return of money taken by HSBC in

charges over the last 3 years plus

interest they have levied on those charges.

HSBC's charges are disproportionate

penalty and therefore unenforceable being

contrary to common law. Further, as a

disproportionate penalty they are invalid

under the Unfair(Contracts) Terms Act 1977

s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2

(1)(e). In the event that the charges are

not a penalty then they are unreasonable

within the meaning of the Supply of Goods

and Services Act 1982 s.15. Have

repeatedly asked the bank to justify

charges but they have declined to do so.

Claimant claims interest under section 69 of

the County Courts Act 1984 at rate of 8%

a year from March 2003 to 19-04-2006 of

£112.32 plus interest at same rate

up to date of judgment or earlier

payment at daily rate of 0.022%.

Hi - I've removed some of the "the" and "a"s and other small words to reduce the number of words. Whether this will reduce the total number of lines not sure, but the meaning is still the same? It was 194 words, 1070 characters and is now 174 words and 996 characters

 

Neil.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck, not that you need it!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...