Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid defaults dissapearing after 6 years


jut
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4526 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Hope you are all well, and I must say fantastic site, really great contributions! This is my first of hopefully many posts! :)

 

I have 4, unpaid defaults on my credit file that will become 6 years old in the next 12 months. As expected, I have a very low credit score because of this.

 

I was wondering if anyone had personal experience of defaults dissapearing from your credit files once they have reached their 6-year age. Taking my Call Credit file as an example, this shows that Lloyds TSB are reporting a default status every month still, hence "carrying" the default on. It is clear this would probably continue, with them marking it every month, until a time when I settled it.

 

Now, here's the issue: in 2006-2007 I was making some reduced payments to some of these accounts, however I since stopped doing this as was in financial difficulty. To confirm, since 2007 I have made no payments whatsoever towards these defaulted accounts.

 

I have just been declined a mortgage with one provider, and went through the credit file data with the Provider over the phone, and she pointed out that this decline was because of the defaults, no surprise to me really.

 

However, what I am now trying to understand is whether I could expect the defaults to come off my file in around 12 months time, since they will be 6 years old from the point of issue, OR if in fact I am looking at waiting 6 years from 2007, since this is the last time I made a payment to the said defaults. If this is the case, it would suggest I was better off not paying them a penny, since this contribution to the debt has actually extended the amount of time the default was on my credit file and as such significantly lowering my credit score for years further!

 

Has anyone had an unpaid default come off after 6 years? That they have been paying or not paying?

 

Any personal experiences highly appreciated!

 

Thanks! :)

 

Jut

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jut, your defaults will drop off your file 6 years after default, so you'll have to wait another 12 months or so for it. I would suggest not trying to apply for another mortgage unless you bank with the provider and they can see your salary coming in over the last couple of years. (Your credit file will continue to show the default update, each month until it is removed.)

 

Also, I think you're getting the default and statute barred confused. If you haven't paid anything to a debt and not acknowledged it in 6 years, then the debt becomes statue barred and you cannot be chased for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they continue to report on the A/C

 

then that info will stay there until the A/C becomes statute barred [6yrs from last financial transaction]

 

the older stuff [as it becomes 6yrs old] will begin to go

but recent reports [within 6yrs] will remain till SB.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they continue to report on the A/C

 

then that info will stay there until the A/C becomes statute barred [6yrs from last financial transaction]

 

the older stuff [as it becomes 6yrs old] will begin to go

but recent reports [within 6yrs] will remain till SB.

 

dx

 

 

Really? But, as these are reported as 'in default' how would they show up after the default is removed? I thought the whole file gets removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? But, as these are reported as 'in default' how would they show up after the default is removed? I thought the whole file gets removed.

 

Thats exactly what I'm getting at - the original default will be 6 years old, however only last month they reported a D status on the account, dated August 2010...so this is a D with August 2010 next to it...

 

Will all of these default payment statuses dissapear when the default reaches 6 years old?

 

Thx

 

Jut

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you need to look at experian or an-other cra file to understand it really

credit call are a funny one.

 

i would suspect that the creditor is reporting something like missed or late or under agreed or no payment - markers

this they will do every month.

those that reach 6yrs from the date that they are put on - will 'drop-off' as they reach 6 yrs.

those that are not 6 yrs old will remain until they drop off.

 

ALL markers will go when the A/C reaches SB time which is 6yrs from your last financial transaction. - the account will vanish from you file - totally

 

HTH

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

jut, the defaults will drop off 6 years after the default date regardless. just keep an eye on your file and on the 6 year date on the dot contact the cra and ask for it to be removed. its irrelevant to your credit file if you were to make a payment between now and the six years. all they can do is update the account balance, but it will still drop off 6 years after the account defaulted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Starting to agree with that. My crf is buggered because of three defaults, the last of which clears in 2013 - or I do settle them and suffer until 2017 (as Jan 2011 is the earliest I can pay them back). What to do?

 

I am in a stable relationship with my partner who wants to buy a house but even if I settle these accounts I will be blighted for 6 years...so it's darling let's wait until 2013 or 2016.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiro, the defaults will still drop off in 2013 even if you pay them off in January next year. trust me, i have settled several accounts a few years after they defaulted and they drop off 6 years after the default date. hopefully you and the god lady will have a mortgage come 2013!

Edited by craigers
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Craigers - that true then...to be honest this is the only reason I didn't want to settle them.

 

But like I have seen from others posts even when defaults are shown settled, they are still defaults when you go for other credit.

 

So if I contact the guys about the defaults they will let me pay the balances and clear the accounts? Given the one is Cabot and one is Roxburg - I am thinking the minute I say I want to clear the balance, they will shove **** loads of interest? Any takers on a fiver that's what they do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiro, they can't add interest! and yes if you pay them off they will show as settled defaults, in other words its still a default. but they will drop off 6 years after the default date, ie 2013. if you're going to pay them off then may i suggest you offer payment only in return for the defaults being completely removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so why don't they do that with arrangements to pay, that you stick to. if I had let it go to a default I would be in a better position now.

 

this is the thing. its totally wrong. its something i intend to press parliament about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can I clarify something? The defaults to not simply 'drop off'. Thewy REMAIN on file and will never be deleted.

 

THew difference is in when the data is accessed, information that becomes time limited will not be displayed to enquirers or appear in any credit reports - BUT will remain on file regardless for 'completeness'. This was explained to me that if the time period for display changes (say, to 10 years) they can imoplement this, and the old data can then magically return.

 

They make their money out of data - they're not going to chuck it away simply because they cannot display it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

like the grammer and spell check buzby!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well at 3am that really confused me...i thought..urm

 

must be time for bed!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the legal limit is 6 years, then to hold data for longer breaks the Data Protection Act i.e. the CR agencies would have to declare they retained that data on your file. I can ask them to remove the data if they are not legally obliged to keep it - which I would assume they are not.

 

The only incentive for me to clear these debts is so I can get credit at reasonable rates BUT...if the records remain as defaults - I still won't be able to get any credit so here's the catch:

 

Don't pay - can't get credit until they fall off in 2013

Pay - can't get credit because they still register as a default until they fall in 2013

 

I ask you...what to do in this rather strange predicament?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the legal limit is 6 years, then to hold data for longer breaks the Data Protection Act i.e. the CR agencies would have to declare they retained that data on your file. I can ask them to remove the data if they are not legally obliged to keep it - which I would assume they are not.

 

Nope. There's a LOT of information on your file which you will never see. Even with a SAR. The information will always remain, however it is FILTERED to match the prevailing requirements. TheY most certainly do not let it 'drop off' or erase it in any meaningful way. It will not show up in a search with a standard enquiry, however there are several levels of access (all justified regarding fraud prevention etc etc, spottingf trends and the like), can be made to reappear under the correct circumstances.

 

As to the circumstances you detail - I agree, why bother paying? If the 'cleared default' still acts as a blight, where is the incentive? I may be cynical, but you may not be the first to state that as you;ve not been taken to court, you fail to see any benefit in clearing the account if your file will be blighted in this way. If you receive an undertaking to remove the default in its ENTIRETY - which means removal, not updating of the status, you will be minded to clear outstanding amounts. The choice is theirs.

 

The moral argument in that you should pay what you owe is somewhat negated by them playing fast and loose with your data in this way. This, and the fact a default is treated like a CCJ, yet has none of the safeguards attached.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

Back again...no mortgage for me and my good lady, she has decided to get one with her sister - something about not being able to trust men..! Understandable really.

 

I can confirm that 6 years on, 2 of my accounts have 'disappeared' which leaves me with 3 outstanding. Everyone now and again I will get the odd random letter from a different company and I do feel a little guilty and my heart twangs with sadness. My question is...do these letters impact on the 6 years statute bar? I hope not, but if they do...I am screwed.

 

Hopefully I can make it to 2013 but I have a sense of forboding that in the last 12 months to come, things are going to change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well done

 

NO LETTER FROM THEM

can ever eset the SB date

 

the only thing that can is a court claim

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only you acknowledging the debts in writing

or making a payment can restart the 6 year

clock.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...