Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • More than 364,000 cases of fraud were recorded to the National Fraud Database in 2019 - the highest ever recorded View the full article
    • If its a domestic address and a normal account, thought they could only bill who is on the Tenancy agreement or Mortgage, as isn't a Tenancy in Common. if Joint tenancy and other party gone, didn't think children who have gained majority can be held liable, as not on any paperwork, apart from Electoral roll.  Is a Lodger liable?
    • Thank you so much for explaining that to me much appreciated 
    • It's not so bad then.  1250L is the standard tax code, and means he can earn £12500 pounds without paying tax, and then just pay tax on anything he earns over that amount.   Due to technically being out of work, and claiming UC, and now going back to work, the code is saying that he will pay tax on anything earned over £6500 pounds now, but it is under review and should change within the next 8-12 weeks, and if he has overpaid in the meantime, then it will be refunded via his paycheck.   The only reason for this is I am assuming that while shielding, his company did not keep him on the books.  If HMRC have got a record of him being on the books, and claiming UC, this will be them determining that he hasn't been trying to fraud the system by being paid as employed at the same time as claiming UC.  Once they clear that up, then they will correct the tax code.  So long as all his earnings and benefits all add up and they are happy then it will be back to normal.
    • Good Afternoon,   I am hoping to receive some advice regarding the below topic.   I was looking to purchase a property off-plan with a incentive attached and in order to secure this you pay a 'finder's fee'.     The fee was paid but then the property was un-mortgageable due to various reasons including the incentive being offered.   Having gone back to the agent to ask for a return of the finder's fee - they have refused saying that the incentive does not need to be disclosed and that essentially my broker is useless and I should use theirs!   Their broker also advised it would be hard to get a mortgage with the incentive disclosed which backs up what my broker has said.    This fee will now be kept on account.     I signed a form which confirms that the finders fee is non refundable - which was my error I should have checked if the property was mortgageable beforehand - however I wondered if there was anything I could do because:   The property is un-mortgageable - my broker tried all lenders including those who are happy with the incentive which was offered They have advised to withhold information which is clearly questioned in the mortgage application process   This is not a case of pulling out, this is a case that I cannot get finance and so cannot proceed.   Thanks in advance.
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies

Domain name transferred without authority?

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3605 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts



It's just come to my attention that a domain name I manage for my dad has been transferred to another registrant without proper authority.


It's a complex dispute, but the domain was originally bought by myself and registered with his personal details (home address, individual registrant in his name). Shortly after that, my dad began working for a company and the domain was used for their emails. Near the beginning of this year, the owner of this company made my dad redundant and he is currently pursuing them through a tribunal for unfair dismissal. On the advice of his solicitor, we have done nothing with the domain and it has remained pointing at the company's hosting/email provider.


Late this week, I was surprised to receive a support ticket notification from the original registrar. Whilst it does not provide any information about the nature of the request, it has attached a nominet registration certificate bearing the company's details. Additionally, the domain has disappeared from the control panel and the whois information bears the company's name (although it still has my dad's address).


I'm still trying to obtain further information regarding the action 123 reg and nominet may have taken. However, my suspicion is that the company has initially contacted Nominet and convinced them to transfer the domain into their name - probably by pretending to be my dad. They have then approached the current registrar with the nominet documentation and asked them to transfer the domain to a separate 123 account.


At the moment, I have raised this with 123 reg/nominet and I'm waiting for their responses. Is there any other action I should be taking - reporting to the police, direct legal action? Also, I should disclose that, whilst the domain was purchased with our own funds and before my dad worked for the company, it is similar to the name of the limited company the have traded under for the last 18 months. This is not a trademark, so I don't believe this would provide them with a legal entitlement to the name, but I appreciate this may introduce a little "grey" into the situation. Also, the domain name has come up in discussions between the owner and my dad, but no agreement was reached.


My dad will obviously be discussing this with his solicitor, but I wondered whether anybody here might be able to provide some suggestions?


Many thanks,



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, James,


I'd think it would belong to whoever paid for it for the length of contract. I've found a site that might help with understanding this area of law called Bitlaw dot com with a section on domain name disputes. I hope this helps a little, sorry I am unable to offer any advice.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you actually purchase the domain name ? If it was bought through a hosting company you might find that the domain was registered with the hosting company and you will be sent a renewal reminder every year/couple of years.


It's a bit sneaky, but is the way a lot of hosts work in return for you having that domain name at a cut down price. If it's a UK company operating under UK regulations, and that is what happened, then your attention should have been brought to that particular clause in the purchase contract.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most .uk (.co.uk, .org.uk etc) domain names are registered for a period of two years, whilst most others (.com and so on) are registered for a period of 12 months. At the end of the period you need to pay for the renewal of the domain name. If you've failed to pay this fee then the domain name can be bought by someone else on or after the date of expiry. What a lot of people don't realise is you can't buy a domain name as such, but you actually lease the right to use it.


If the domain name was transferred without permission then it may be worth raising this issue with the registrar first (in your case 123-reg), and then failing that, I believe Nominetwill be your next port of call by using their Dispute Resolution Service.


Please note on this next bit I'm not 100% sure on this so if anyone is more knowledgeable please set me right. As you've said, the domain name was both dormant (pointing to the parking page) and similar to that of a trading company, they could possibly claim it as their own. As the domain was dormant, I believe it would be covered by cyber squatting rules which would allow the company to claim it so that a person can't hold the domain to ransom, spoof their website or use it for anything dodgy. As far as I know, you don't specifically have to hold a trademark on a name for a company to be able to raise a dispute - simply showing that you trade as a company is enough. If the website was actually being utilised for something (a family website or something legitimate) then you would have been in a stronger position as far as the resolution service goes.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...