Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent Cabot Defence Needed - Can anyone help


nometer
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have finally decided to pull my head out of the sand after recieveing a claim, its now time to put up a fight.

Hi I've been reading through loads of threads but don't seem to find an answer..

So I thought its time to post for some help.

I need to get a defence in to the court by Monday.

I have a cc debt from morgan stanley that was brought by cabot.

some time ago I sent them a CCA request and recieved a Credit agrement that did have my signiture and details, the terms and conditions were unreadable... so I asummed unenforacble!

Since the wakesman ruling I've been informed that they can produce any terms and conditions, making the agrement enforcable.

One area of defence I have that I belive good, well I'm hoping it is, I never recieved a default notice or a notice of assignment from Morgan Stanley.

All cabot have sent me is a letter with a barcley's letter head with 'representation of letter sent' written accross the top. claiming this is a valid default notice and notice of assignment.

I checked my credit record and no default on there from morgan stanley, only a default listed by cabot after they brought the debt.

Can anyone offer some advice on this, or point to some threads that could help..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have another post regarding a claim that cabot have raised against me.

I have a question regarding charges and interest.

On the statements I have recieved it looks like lots of the balance is made up from charges and interest. Should all the charges be added to the balance or can I claim that the amout owed is incorrect?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

It would be better to keep your questions in one thread so I have merged the two

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked the claimant for any documents as yet?

What are the Particulars of Claim?

What dates are on the POC?

 

Just a little info about defaults. What you saw on your credit file was that Cabot replace the original creditor once they took over the debt

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for looking in silverfox.

I have'nt requested anything since the claim was made. I did recieve about 6 months ago a mocked up notice of assignment, an unreadable credit agreement, a mocked up default notice and some statements.

The poc's are:

The claimant is the assignee of a debt from goldfish bank ltd. Credit card ref xxxxxx notice of assignent having been given to the defendant in writingi. Despite demand for payment xxxx remains outstanding. The claimant claims xxx and interest under s.69 county courts bat 1984 and costs.

Not really to sure I understand these?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have acknowledge the service and my 28 days is up Monday.

Initially I was just going to roll over and let them get the judgment, but now I'm feeling ready for a fight.

I will have a read through the threads and see if I can get my head around them.

Could I send an embaressed defence that I have seen used alot on here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From reading through those threads it looks as if i'm going to have to take the judgement. I have left it too late by burying my head in the ground and hoping this will go away. The defence has to be in on monday, so no chance to request information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can still file an embarrassed defence but will probably have to fax it on monday. Have you received any of the documents mentioned in the POC or requested them at anytime? Are they claiming the full amount or just part of the total debt leaving a balance?

 

You will need to phone the court on Monday to check when the defence has to be in. You can also still send off the request to the claimant for the information.

 

I will read through the thread again.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning after another sleepless night! If I send off my cpr request monday straight away to morgans solicitors, then get an embarresd defence off to the court. Does anyone know of a starting point for the defence, or point my in the right direction where to look. Also should I mention about the fact I have never received a default notice,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am back - sorry I will give you a hand - don't know if we can attract anyone else to the fight. Your main defence is no 'original' copy of the credit agreement and I will work on that.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suggested defence - any comments or amends welcome

In the Northampton county court

Claim number ££££££

 

between

 

xxxxxxx claimant

 

and

 

££££££££ - Defendant

 

Defence

(Full name and address)

I £££££££ of £££££££££ am the defendant in this action and make the following statement as my defence to the claim made by Cabot.

 

2. Except where otherwise mentioned in this defence, I neither admit nor deny any allegation made in the claimants Particulars of Claim and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.

 

3.The claimants Particulars of Claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR even allowing for the constraints of the bulk issue system

 

4.The defendant is a litigant in person and requires sight of the following documentation to enable a proper defence to be entered.

 

Original signed agreement

Full payment details on original sum owed

Original Default Notice

Original Notice of Assignment

Explanation of interest and costs

 

5. The claimants Particulars of Claim refer to a ‘credit card’. It is not admitted that the defendant signed any agreement with the claimant for such an account. If, which is not admitted, such an agreement exists, the precise terms and date of any such agreement are not admitted. The defendant does not have in their possession any such agreement and is not therefore able to comment thereon. The claimant is put to strict proof as to the date and terms of such agreement.

 

6. It is averred that if any agreement did exist that the aforesaid agreement would be a regulated agreement within the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ("the Act"). It is not admitted that any alleged Agreement is enforceable within the terms of the Act. As the defendant does not have a copy of the said agreement the claimant is put to strict proof that the aforesaid agreement was properly executed and has been enforceable at all times since its’ inception.

 

7. The claimants Particulars of Claim refer to a ‘Notice of Assignment’. It is not admitted that the defendant received a properly executed ‘Notice of Assignment’.

 

8. Further and in the alternative it is not admitted that the sum claimed is lawfully owing. The claimant is put to strict proof as to how the sum claimed and interest has been calculated and as to how it is asserted that the sum claimed is contractually owing.

 

7. Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit, the defendant respectfully asks the court to be allowed to submit a fully particularised defence should the claimant provide copies of the original documents they will rely upon.

 

8. The defendant wishes to allow the claimant additional time to produce the documents mentioned above and would respectfully ask the court to allow a further 21 days for this. Should the documents not be produced then the defendant asks the court to exercise its powers to strike out the claimants claim.

 

9. Further to the above, the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

Statement of Truth

 

I believe the above statement to be true and factual

 

Signed

 

Dated

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the agreement signed?

 

Sorry found it - this needs to have your details and signature - and be legible. You need to request the original.

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send CPR request to the address for correspondence on POC. Under CPR 15.5 you can ask them for a further 28 days to file a full defence - if they agree, you need to tell the court - not sure if you need to do this with embarrassed defence. You can change the time in the defence to 28

The CPR request you send must ask for:

Copies of the notices of assignment from both the original creditor, and your client together with proofs of service of the same

A full and complete statement of account including all payments made and charges applied covering the period beginning with the day of the making of the agreement and ending on the date of this letter.

 

As well as the original credit agreement

You can send a copy of the defence with the CPR.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be worth ringing Barclaycard - who now own MS, and ask who they sold the debt to and if there is a Notice of Assignment - if so ask them to confirm in writing. You can send a SAR request but they have up to 40 days to reply.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will get straight onto them Monday morning. CPR Morgans and SAR request Barcleys.

I think i will file the defence that you have suggested with the dates revised to 28 days. Hopefully the judge will accpet that defence then I will have enough time to get all the docs together.

Can't thank you enough for all your help coledog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is working but not sure - ring the court first thing tomorrow to find out your exact dates, they are normally very helpful. Ask about how you can submit the defence as you may be able to do this on line. The CPR goes to the solicitor acting for Cabot or Cabot, depending on what it says on the POC. The SAR to original creditor - Barlaycard with £10 postal order, specifically ask for the NOA as you have not received the original if it exists. Don't forgot to add request for the NOA and breakdown to the CPR. They should really have attached the NOA to the POC as they mention it.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...