Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cca recieved


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4952 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi can anyone tell me the next step please link financial bought my debt from ford credit and immediately demanded full payment of 3;700 i sent them a cca letter in which they didnt conform within the 12 + 2 but belatedly sent me a true signed copy in which they state where this request was made under section 77 or 78 of the consumer credit act 2006 this document fulfils our obligations were to go now please any advise greatfully recieved

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Before any real advice can be given, are you able to post the "agreement" up on the forum (minus personal info)?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it was a loan (Ford Credit) was there any payment protection on it?

Does the agreement have:

Amount of credit?

The APR?

Repayment terms?

 

Was the agreement signed at their place of business or was it done by post?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ppi it does have amount of credit and apr and repayment terms and date and signed by both parties on their premises it looks proper to me dated 24/3/06 i am already on a dmp cant afford this what should i do ps they didnt send the cca till after 12:2 days so i did send of the second letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi just got the original aggreement out to compare and noticed on the original copy right at the end in a box ford credit use only is empty on my original copy but on theirs is filled in also on the direct debit slip there is no ref nos although it states please fill in the whole form dont know if this makes any difference

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what you describe, it sounds enforceable.

The differences between your copy and their copy can be explained by there being twp copies of the agreement. One which you sign and give to them and the customer copy which you keep.

If you were to add it to your dmp(It's not a fee paying one is it?), wouldn't the other crediotrs be taking less as payments are pro-rata

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thnks thought it was more likely to be,the dpm does have a fee involved i pay a total of 200 pounds per month to ten creditors £50 going on management fees should i make a offer of say ten to fifteen% of the total debt as a full and final settlement or spread it amongst the others i am now thinking of going down the same route ie unenforcable on the other debts what do you advise appreciate your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to dump the fee paying one and go with CCCS or Payplan. They don't charge and most creditors will deal better with them than the fee paying ones.

 

If you haven't CCA'd all the creditors, it can do no real harm to do so but only for loans and cards-not for overdrafts.

I would do this before you swap dmp's. CCCS and Payplan don't like you removing debts from the dmp when they are unpaid.

 

If the debts are still with the original creditors, I think they won't accept such a low F&F however, if they can't supply an agreement, it "might" put you in a better position when offering a low F&F.

If the debts are with a DCA, that is better (if that's the right word) They paid less than the full amount of the debt so may be more amenable to a low F&F.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks am actually thinking of going to a company called innovative finance who manage the debts plus do all the cca work with all of the creditors for a lesser fee and they hope to either write some of the debt off or get it drastically reduced they claim to have a team of lawyers etc going over the cca,s have you come across this company? thnks for your interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

i realise what you are saying it makes a lot of sense but the time involved and stuff i am not familiar with it seems in my circumstance it makes more sense to pass the buck and see how it goes the last 18 months i have had things couldnt get any worse i am in unfamiliar territory and need to get sorted pronto or i lose everything i have worked so hard for thanks so much for your input

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...