Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Where do i start? Reposession threat/Secured Loan/PPI reclaim, etc....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4959 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone

 

This is not for me it's for my mother. The situation is that my father passed away suddenly last year despite always seeming in excellent health. My mother and I are shocked and devastated and always will be....

 

Now i am doing my utmost to help my mother sort out the finances.

 

Before my father died they had a joint first mortgage on their house of approx £40,000 and a secured loan with 'a loan company' totalling about £65,000 (not sure why it totals that amount when they took out the loan facility in 2006 and it was for that amount then!).

 

Although everything was joint, my mother doesn't really understand anything right now, said it was all in the hands of my father (who was a wonderful man and completely overloaded with work in the last few years, but never complained).

 

So now i'm faced with the task of trying to understand why there is no mortgage insurance on their first mortgage (when my dad always said there was - although in the last few years he might have had to stop it i don't know - remember he didn't know he would die).....

 

and why they signed up to PPI with the secured loan company's underwriters (suggested or recommended by them) that was only providing cover for 3 years - it ran out in the summer, my father died in the autumn.

 

I am new to all this - what an introduction eh! I have all the paperwork in front of me and need to go through it with a fine tooth comb to see if everything was done correctly. I am also checking whether my mother qualifies for legal aid and if so then i will get the loan checked out thoroughly to ensure the agreement was sound in the first place.

 

My mother is really in a bad place. She is likely to be reposessed at some point, although right now the loan company is allowing her to make interest payments only.

 

I guess i'm posting here to see if anyone can advise on the following:

 

* What to look for in the loan agreement to check that everything was done correctly at the time of the original agreement - it probably was but obviously i need to make sure now

 

* any other ideas that could keep my mum in her home. Eg, i've wondered if she could get equity release and use it to pay off most of the loan - if the loan company would agree to a full settlement at slightly less than is owed. Apparently the max equity release she could get is £52,000. Her first mortgage company seem happy for her to continue paying interest only - so for the time being that wouldn't be a problem and if the loan were removed, then maybe something could be worked out wit the first mortgage.

 

I've read so much on this forum and others that my eyes are sore - it would really help to interact with people that are knowledgeable and experienced on this stuff. I'm not but my mum is relying on me now and i want to do the best i can.

 

thanks for listening!!! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Information Seeker

 

Welcome to CAG

 

You've come to the right place, the guys will offer advise shortly.

 

Was the PPI mis-sold or was it stopped? I think something you should do is get more information from the loan companies. Send a SAR request with £10 postal order

it gives them 40 days to provide you with all the data they have on the loans, covering a minimum 6 year period. Your mum would have to make the request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rebel11

 

Obviously there are two 'mortgages' here the original mortgage and the secured loan....

 

As they know my mum cannot pay and are merely giving her some time by allowing her to pay interest, i don't want to upset them. We have quite a bit of info in front of us at the moment - i have copies of the loan agreement and it clearly states that the PPI was for only 3 years - it wasn't stopped, it expired as it said it would.

 

I think there could have been a better way to 'sell' the product to my parents in the first place...

 

I have information on how it was done - mainly by letter. There was considerable broker fees considering that my parents never had a face to face meeting with anyone and mum doesn't remember any advice at all.

 

I have got a solicitor who is willing to go through the loan agreement with a fine tooth comb, just checking first whether mum qualifies for legal aid.

 

Re the first mortgage - i don't know whether to ask for any info yet, they are not threatening my mum with reposession, they haven't been the source of stress (that said the loan company may have done everything above board too - i just want to check everything)

 

thanks for listening

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a letter in front of me from someone my dad might have approached for help....but it didn't amount to anything....but the person looks like they were trying to resolve things...

 

in the letter they have said 'You have an amount of £9877 of PPI added to the loan. This relates to about 14.35% of the loan so is costing about £136.87 per month. Do you know what this covers you for? Does it cover you for the whole term (15yrs), eg if you were off sick from now would it pay the loan for the next 15 years or just 12 months. If only 12 months then you will have paid £9877 for a policy that pays out £9800. Also over the 15yrs you will have paid about £24000. I assume the policy was ful;ly explained to you by the broker who sold it to you. As you were charged £750 by the broker over and above the commission that they were paid on this policy I also assume that you were given full advice and recommendation by the broker concerned.'

 

It looks like this person was trying to help.

 

I'm struggling to see what the PPI would have covered them for....i will try and decipher that today............but the person that wrote the above didn't seem to know that the PPI was for 3 years only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it looks like the loan company will close in for reposession shortly. They have given mum one more month at her current payment agreement (a verbal agreement only) and then they will pass the situation over to their collections department.

 

Mum knows reposession is likely to take place and is prepared - well as prepared as you can be when you've just lost your husband and now losing your home....

 

What are we to expect though? (i don't live with mum but i was very close to both parents and i see this as my problem).

 

Meanwhile i'm beginning communication with a solicitor's group who will check the loan thoroughly for enforceability and PPI.

 

I've just looked at the figures:

 

The initial loan (4 years ago) was for £68,841.00. Today my mum owes them £66,000.00. This is despite my parents paying £35,000.00 over the last 4 years! I'm not clear on what all the additional charges would have been for....didn't like to ask as i didn't want to upset the company....but if they are going to try and evict my mum soon then i need to find out.

 

Regarding the equity relase thing i was taling about - i don't think that's possible as the money released would have to first clear the first mortgage - i think there is a rule somewhere that you cannot clear a second mortgage with equity until you've cleared the first - even though the first mortgage company isn't trying to repossess the home!

 

thanks for listening, your thoughts are welcome!!! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...