Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

faulty washing machine bought from comet


guyster1973uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello everyone. i purchased an indesit wixxe127 washing machine from my local comet store on the 2nd of may 2010 i paid £199 for the product however 2 months (july) after i purchased the item the door latch developed a fault(door would not click over and lock when i tryed to close the door)and faulty drum paddles( they had come loose) i phoned comet customer services explained the faults to them. they said no problem sir we will send someone out to repair the faults. the engineer came out replaced the drum paddles and repaired the door latch. while he was doing the repair i was talking to him and he said that the door latch becoming faulty is a common problem on that particular model.i didnt think anything of it. so the washing machine was working fine again and on the 11th of september 2010 the door latch again developed a fault(door would not click over and lock when i tryed to close the door). i phoned comet customer services again and explained to them that this is the 2nd time in 4months that the door latch has broken. i also said that i was not happy with the machine and that i did not want it repaired again or exchanged. i explained i wanted the machine picked up and give me a full refund. i was told oh sorry sir we cant give refunds after 28 days from date of purchase. i contacted consumer direct and explained to them the situation. they said u are quite within your rights to refuse a repair. i phoned comet and told them i was dealing with consumer direct and was told by consumer direct i was well within my rights to refuse a repair. comet said to me thats fine sir but we still need to send someone to do an inspection. i said thats fine. the engineer came out on 16th september 2010 done the inspection and filled out a report and he confirmed what the first engineer had said about the faulty door latch on that model of machine was a common problem . i phoned comet on 17th september 2010 to find what was going to happen and they basically informed me that the service centre were not prepared to exchange or refund because they felt that the item could be repaired.i informed them that i didnt want a repair done i wanted the item removed and a full refund on the grounds that the door latch had broken once had been repaired once has broken again for a 2nd time and if i allowed it to be repaired it could break again and again.

 

does anyone know where i stand with trading standards or can i make a claim ?

 

thanks

guyster

 

p.s. sorry about the long drawn explanation lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Sorry but I have not fully read your post as I dont have much time in this internet cafe. I just have a pure fact for you which you and anyone else may like to know.

 

The failure rate for washing machines within the period covered by the Sale of Goods Act, is OVER 130%. Hard to explain, does not mean every one will fail - but means others may fail multiple times over their life span. You would think this figure would be much lower.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...