Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DMP and next


debtstruggle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4968 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I have a DMP with the cccs, have been on it since July 2009 now.

 

Next have accepted an offer of £5 per month, they accepted this when the plan started in July 2009.

 

Thing is, recently they have sent me letters, this has happened twice and both are letters saying sign the enclosed credit agreement and send it back to us so we can accept your offer.

 

I'm thinking if I sign this, then they have a credit agreement signed by me, which I don't like the idea of.

 

Would you guys sign it and send it back? or keep ignoring it like I have been so far?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not sign I would say that this agreement could be prior to April 2007 and they do not have a signed agreement so would not be able to enforce in court. They want you to sign so they then have a current agreement they could enforce.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is exactly what I thought.

 

There is no way I'm going to sign it, just incase thats what they are after.

 

Maybe I should send the CCA letter to them anyway?

Along with all my other creditors.

 

I posted about doing this a while ago but I printed the letters and put them away safely until I could afford the postal orders to sent them off, then things took priority and they got forgotten about, I think its time to reprint and send them all off.

 

What do you think?

 

Also, if these companies can't prove my debt, what are the possible retaliations they may do if I stop paying them?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no just in case about it. They want you to sign an enforceable agreement as they probably don't have one, as is the case with most pre 2007 Next account. DO NOT sign it under any curcumstances.

 

Is there a considerable balance outstanding?

 

As for consequences of not paying them, they will hounds your with constant letters and phone calls demanding payment and will almost certainly stuff your credit file up with a big black Default. There pet monkey solicitors Howard Cowen will threaten court action, but apart from that, there is not much by way of legal enforcement they can do without a signed agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does that apply to the other creditors too?

 

To be honest, the balance with next is ridiculous, last time I looked it was about £80.

 

I won't be signing the credit agreement they keep sending, although they seem desperate as they have now sent 2! :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will not take any court action for that amount

 

I would cca next, they will have nothing they never do, they will just send you a blank agreement.

Then once you have established its unenforceable, dispute the account and offer them a F&F offer of 10% of the balance an the condition any adverse data on you credit file is removed, the account is marked as settled and they will not sell or attempt to collect the remaining balance at a later date. Get this in writing before parting with any money.

 

Do not discuss anything regarding the request on the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...