Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Personal Injury Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm looking for advice on a personal injury claim.....not sure if I am posting in the right place though.

 

Had an accident just over two and a half years ago.....very old man missed the stop sign on a dark and wet night and crashed into my nearside.....third party immediately accepted liability. My knee was damaged and I had whiplash. I initially saw a G.P through the solicitors dealing with the case but because of ongoing symptoms was referred via a medical agency to see an 'expert witness'. His report wasn't exceptionally helpful in that he said that I had a pre-existing neck condition.....cervical spondylosis - had never been diagnosed or seen a doctor for this except 10 years earlier had some neck pain and my G.P referred me for physio.....never had problems again after this. Told by my doc that anyone my age would have cervical spondylosis of varying degrees but usually symptom free.

The cartilage in my knee was badly damaged and later resulted in surgery.....I now have osteoarthritis but this doc also put that down to my age even though he entirely agreed the cartilage damage was caused by the accident.

 

Solicitor advised that we should seek an opinion from another expert but this was even more unhelpful......he kept me waiting for an hour and a half.....saw me for 6 minutes and wrote a report stating that my injuries were not due to a car accident but rather to my being overweight.

 

Solicitor advised me to stick with the first expert witnesses report and try to settle on that. Didn't agree but she gave me no option as she said if we pursued it they may not be able to recover their fees. She said she thought she could get it agreed that I would not have to pay for the second report (£650.00) as it was biased and he was obviously prejudice against overweight people.

 

Settlement was agreed several weeks ago and I have been waiting for the cheque which just arrived. The solicitor sent me a breakdown of the settlement a month ago but the accompanying letter sent with the cheque states that I have had to pay for the second report.....this has been taken out of the settlement before it was sent to me. She said in her letter that she had "attempted to obtain a credit against the report but the only compromise was a reduction to £500", which they have taken.

 

Is there anything I can do or any way I can get this money back? Was thinking of the small claims court?

Edited by clarion48
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

You shouldn't really have to pay for the second report. I would look through your previous letters from your solicitors to see if they ever informed you that obtaining a second medical would cost you as ergo if you relied upon the second medical you would not be relying upon your first medical etc... If they have never informed you then they are in breach of a number of regulations and you can report them to the LCS if they do not agree to refund the cost of the medical.

 

If they have told you then it get's a little trickier. In all likelyhood you will have probably signed up for an insurance premium called an 'After The Event' policy. This protects you from any costs being found against you or disbursements incurred. if they haven't signed you up for one then they haven't represented your interests properly and again you can report them to the LCS. Solicitors don't like claiming off these policies as they usually have an agreement with the insurers to get good deals and if they start to get claims off them all the time then they are not going to get good deals anymore.

 

I would also look at your initial client care letter which the solicitors should have sent out to you in which they will details all the funding etc that you will be reponsible for. If you don't have one or it is limited then you can again make a complaint to the LCS who are usually very happy to sort such things out for you.

 

Initially I would write to the complaints partner at the firm and his/her name HAS to be given on the client care letter that was initially sent to you at the beginning of the claim. They have to send you this letter by law. List your grievances and the complaints partner will have to look at it and respond to you ASAP. If you don't like the outcome then write to the LCS here:

 

http://www.legalcomplaints.org.uk/home.page

 

They usually take great delight in kicking solicitors if they have done anything wrong and are not usually partisan.

 

The main problem you will have is if they have told you that you would have to pay and it was you that insisted that you obtained a second medical report against their advice.

 

Concentrate on what advice they gave you and what informed choices they gave you as a result. If you didn't know you were going to be charged then they don't really have a leg to stand on, no pun intended.....

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.....thanks for reply.

 

It was my solicitor who suggested the second report and arranged the appointment. She did mention the fee but also told me firstly, that if we relied on the report I would not have to pay......and then later, after she saw the report suggested that she could get the fee waived because it was a biased report.

 

When the settlement was agreed she telephoned me and gave me the settlement details over the phone, which I wrote down. By the time she wrote to me two weeks later this figure had been reduced by £650.00, which she said had been paid to the medical agency in relation to an MRI scan the doctor sent me for. There had previously never been any mention of me having to pay for an MRI scan. A further letter then reduced the settlement amount by £1065.00, which she said was to pay for my physiotherapy.....the final total given then was what I would actually receive. It was therefore quite a shock to receive the cheque and find that another £500 had been taken off to pay for this medical report.

 

I have come to the conclusion throughout this two and a half year, very stressful process, that not only do the insurance companies rip people off but the solicitors working with them are obviously in cahoots with them and rip people off big time as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely write to the senior complaints partner in this one. It is fairly shocking in my opinion that they have deducted anything from you having not informed you of the risks.

 

I suspect, not having agreed with you that these disbursements were yours to pay, are in breach of the Solicitors Account Regulations 2009 as well.

 

Are your solicitors a large firm and your solicitor actually a qualified solicitor ?

 

It may be the case that your physio and mri scan was part of the agreed settlement, however, prior to any settlement your solicitor should have ensured you were aware that the overall figure included these deductions etc.

Edited by Endymion
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

It seems a long time before coming back to this thread but if you read on you will understand why.

 

I wrote a letter to the senior partner of the solicitors firm in October 2010 concerning the fee for the second report, which I strongly objected to paying and also mentioned disbursements. Having had no reply within four weeks I contacted my case handler. She asked me to scan the letter and email it to her and she would speak to the senior partner. I did this.....but every time I asked her about it there was another reason why it hadn't been dealt with. In April this year she told me it was her fault but assured me it would be dealt with straight away. A month later and no response I wrote to the senior partner again and sent copies of all the emails that had gone backwards and forwards.....no reply. I then contacted him by email. He told me he had allocated the case to one of the managers who should have been in touch with me. I explained that after nine months I was somewhat frustrated.....he assured me of an answer this week.

 

I finally received a call from this manager a couple of days ago......throughout the conversation he blinded me with jargon that I barely understood but the crux of it was that he said I had gone for the second referral and therefore the fee was down to me. He answered my question about disbursements by telling me that it would of had to have been claimed off the third party insurers and therefore I would have had to prove there was a 50% chance or higher that if we went back to the expert, he would have changed his report? Didn't understand a word of it although he says he will put it all in writing....but I will not get my money back.

 

Any suggestions on what to do now?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I haven't read all of your thread, but have you spoken to the LCS [Legal Complaints Service]? You should find them via the Law Society website. They should be able to advise you what to do next and will mediate if you decide to complain, as your treatment sounds terrible.

 

We did this about a probate matter and they were OK.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks HB. The LCS has closed.....there is a notice on their website to say they are no longer taking cases and referring everyone to the Legal Ombudsman. I will get on to them tomorrow.

 

Really? I'm stunned. Still, you can use the ombudsman as a threat. If it's like the insurance one, it costs the firm money whether they win or not, and not to mention all the paperwork they would have to provide.

 

Please let us know how you get on.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A dilemma......

 

I made my complaint official with the Legal Ombudsman and have now received their letter to say that an investigator will be appointed in about 10 days time. In the meantime, I have just received an email from the senior partner at the solicitors firm. He does not acknowledge any liability for the medical report costs and has said he is sorry we have reached this point and because of the delay in getting to this point.....is offering me £200 compensation.

 

The big question is.....do I take it.....or do I leave things in the hands of the Legal Ombudsman? I contacted them this morning to let them know about the offer but they cannot advise on what to do now. They said that the investigation could go either way.....they could find that a fair offer to resolve has been made and on the grounds that I didn't accept, I end up with nothing......but on the other hand they could find that is not a fair offer and award much more.

 

What to do eh? :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, but don't really understand your post. This is an insurance forum and my claim is for personal injury through my insurance company. Because the claim is dealt with by a firm of solicitors appointed by the insurance company they are governed by the Legal Ombudsman. Not sure why you think this is a case for the FOS....it has nothing to do with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...