Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Could you link us to BankFodder's post please? The judge's office means something different to me. HB
    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hills v Barclaycards(s)


,hills
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6277 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think things may have crossed in the post.

 

I started MCOL claim 2nd November and it was issued 3rd November, deemed served on 8th November.

 

I also sent Barclaycard a letter 2nd November forewarning them that expect notice from MCOL and gave them the Claim number.

 

Meanwhile I received an offer of £670, letter dated 6th November.

 

Things obviously crossed in the post.

 

I have now received my statement that shows they have credited my account with the £670.

 

Obviously I am not interested in part payment and want the full £3,004.

 

Do I need to inform MCOL that I have received a part credit.

Do I need to acknowledge the credit to Barclaycard and say I accept only as part payment.

or

Do I do nothing as the claim has already been served anyway and Barclaycard have until 22nd November to reply to MCOL.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would definately write to Barclaycard and tell them that you will accept the credited amount as "partial payment".

 

I wouldn't notify MCOL yet as the claim has been fully settled.

 

Good Luck

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Have now received the N149 Allocation form from Northampton Court.

 

All seems straightforward thanks to the step by step help.

 

A couple of queries if someone could help please.

 

- I presume, my local court has the information previously sent to Northampton, (letters, amount claimed, spreadsheet etc).

 

- In section G, Further Information. Should I leave this blank.

 

- What happens to the £100 paid to the local court. How/when do you add this on to the total claimed.

 

Thanks

 

Nearly there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

iGroup (GE Money) - AoS Filed late, defence late, amended defence also late despite extra time requested and granted.

Vanquis - Claim issued, no AoS or Defence received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update

 

Gave the Allocation form into Court on Thursday, paid the £100.

 

Suppose wait for court date now.

 

In other posts by people, everyone mentions preparing the bundle of paperwork,

 

- what is it

- can I start preparing now while I'm waiting for the court date

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the FAQs - Bankfodder has a zip file with everything you should need for the court bundle (excepting your own correspondence of course).

_________________________________________

Alliance & Leicester MBNA Credit Card

Data Protection Act letter sent 3 July 2006.

Incomplete list of charges received 12 August 2006

Requested repayment of charges 10 November 2006

LBA sent 24 November 2006

Estimated £4650 in fines and interest.

Barclaycard

Data Protection Act letter sent 3 July 2006.

Incomplete statements sent 9 July 2006

Requested repayment of charges 14 August 2006

LBA sent 30 August 2006

Estimated £468 in fines and interest.

Initiated claim at MCOL 20 September 2006

Claiming £615.47 including fines & interest, s69 interest and costs

Claim acknowledged 10 October 2006

Defence filed 20 October 2006

Settled in full £640 total. 14 December 2006

Vodafone

Requested Default Notice removed 10 July 2006

Received letter agreeing to request 10 August 2006

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still can't find info on 'court bundle'.

 

Can anybody please explain or supply a link in order for me to prepare for next step.

 

Thanks

 

Hi ,hills,

 

Hope you had a good xmas.

 

Try this link to the basic court bundle. You will need to add in all your bits ie letters too and from, statements, letters from court etc.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html

 

Hope this helps.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope I havn't made a mess up at the last stages,

 

When giving the Court the Allocation Questionaiire and fee before Xmas, in section G, Other Information, I just put in "I believe you have all the relevant documentation ..... any further will be supplied....."

 

After continually reading the forums, it now looks like I didn't fully understand what I should have put in as per the FAQ's

 

I am due to call the Court today as Barclaycard had until the 26th December to reply to the Court but I havn't heard anything.

 

Because of not filling in section G as reccommended, will this affect my claim.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope I havn't made a mess up at the last stages,

 

When giving the Court the Allocation Questionaiire and fee before Xmas, in section G, Other Information, I just put in "I believe you have all the relevant documentation ..... any further will be supplied....."

 

After continually reading the forums, it now looks like I didn't fully understand what I should have put in as per the FAQ's

 

I am due to call the Court today as Barclaycard had until the 26th December to reply to the Court but I havn't heard anything.

 

Because of not filling in section G as reccommended, will this affect my claim.

 

Thanks

 

Hi hills,

 

I wouldn't worry about it as I didn't in my case against Barclays. For future claims its worth adding the following as you are requesting the the court orders standard disclosure, which would mean the banks would either have to settle quicker or disclose their costs etc, which they would never do. The text advised should read somethin like this:

 

"I am respectfully requesting my claim be heard via the small claims

track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and

not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the

defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed

or even reflect their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their

actual costs and I am surprised the defendant did not counterclaim

for these, as I would have paid them without argument. However,

the continuing problem is (in common with the hundreds of other

cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the

banks are refusing to reveal the details of their penalty-charging

regime, and that the charges they apply to accounts for exceeding

overdraft limits and so on are entirely disproportionate to the

actual costs the banks incur. As the banks have a fiduciary duty

towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly

and in utmost good faith. Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that

the court in this case, not withstanding allocations to the small

claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in

the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid

end to this litigation. I have attached the schedule of the charges

I am claiming for to this allocation questionnaire to show a

breakdown of the amounts for the courts perusal.

I believe the case will take no longer than 1 hour".

 

However it is not essential. I wrote to the court after submitting my AQ and asked if the Judge would consider ordering it after, but heard nothing back. My claim still was settled in full.

 

Don't stress its not the end of the world.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Chased up local County Court re any news. They have said it is being transferred to London Mercantile due to the amount of cases they have had.

 

Waiting to hear from them now.

 

Wife is worried because it's her card(s) I'm chasing up. She's petrified she will have to stand up before the Judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it wont come to that but it is useful for her to do some reading just in case so if it did she would be prepared.

 

Also it will not be in a courtroom anyway it would be in the judges chamber more than likely.

 

But 99.9% it will be settled prior to this anyway so I wouldn't worry just read up and be prepared.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Recieved notification from Court today giving 13th February London Mercantile Court.

 

It states it will be a Small Claims Hearing... several others will raise similar cases.... although allocated Multi track.... cost rules fo the Small Claims Track should apply...

 

A few questions.

 

- If it does come to the day and it looks like I have to turn up, would I be able to go rather than my wife (I'm doing the paperwork on behalf of her), as she has 2 school runs in the morning and again later on in the day.

 

- Looking at the Court Bundle thread, it mentions you will be asked to forward copies to the Court and Barclaycard. But the paperwork I received makes no mention of this. It says 'the hearing is intended to give directions for the hearing'. Do i need to have 3 copies with me or do I post them or do I do nothing until requested.

 

- Did everyone go to WH Smiths etc to ge proper binders etc.

 

- When copying Bank Statements, do you only copy those statements with actual charges you are contesting.

 

 

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recieved notification from Court today giving 13th February London Mercantile Court.

 

It states it will be a Small Claims Hearing... several others will raise similar cases.... although allocated Multi track.... cost rules fo the Small Claims Track should apply...

 

A few questions.

 

- If it does come to the day and it looks like I have to turn up, would I be able to go rather than my wife (I'm doing the paperwork on behalf of her), as she has 2 school runs in the morning and again later on in the day. (I would think she would have to attend)

 

- Looking at the Court Bundle thread, it mentions you will be asked to forward copies to the Court and Barclaycard. But the paperwork I received makes no mention of this. It says 'the hearing is intended to give directions for the hearing'. Do i need to have 3 copies with me or do I post them or do I do nothing until requested. (its up to you when you send this but I would wait until they request it, a dealine of 14 days prior to court date is the norm)

 

- Did everyone go to WH Smiths etc to ge proper binders etc. (for the judge its good to have it preparred and easilly referencable (if thats a word) and yours should be the same, however for the bank you can just take it into the branch and then tell them what it is and ask for a reciept, they can send it through internal post (and it p*sses them off).

 

- When copying Bank Statements, do you only copy those statements with actual charges you are contesting. (yes, save the trees and your ink. If no charges on them then you dont need them.)

 

 

 

Many thanks

 

HTH

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Tanzarelli

 

Just to reconfirm, when I attend the initial Small Claims Hearing, I do not need to have already sent the Court Bundle.

 

It will be the next stage that I will need to have it prepared.

 

Thanks

 

No this is just to see which track they give your claim. However if you feel like taking it with you then that is fine. However when the main court date is given you will need to have sent it to the court and the Defendant 14 prior to this.

 

Hope that clarifies this for you.

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any news?

 

I have a hearing on the 19th Feb....!?

 

Dont know what to take other than myself, for this??

 

Have Barclays ever turned up to an allocation hearing???

 

Have you tried contacting barclays for settlement??

 

 

Nervous (because never been this far before) but confident (we are right) times......

 

Innocent

:D CLICK MY SCALES IF I HAVE BEEN USEFUL :D

*

BARCLAYCARD WON £307

*

CAPITAL ONE WON £2.1k

*

NATWEST WON £3.4k

*

LLOYDS TSB CURRENT

Start 26/4 LBA 7/6 conLBA 22/1 N1 12/3 AQ 3/5/07ONHOLD

MORE THAN/ LLOYDS MCARD

Start 2/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

MONUMENT VISA

Start 1/11 CONTL LBA 15/1/07 NOW RE-RESEARCHING

NATWEST BUSINESS

RESEARCHING

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...