Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pressured into buying special delivery from PO


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone experience the pressure of the staff in the PO they trying to send a letter by recorded delivery. :mad2:

 

For years now I always get their spiel when I go into my local very busy PO with ticket queuing system.

After waiting for 10 minutes for my ticket to be called out, I went to counter to pay for 1st class recorded delivery service. When I passed my letter to the man behind the counter he did not stop putting down the recoded service and keep trying to make me take out their £4 to £5 special deliver services. He actually went as far as saying this service is not to be trusted. This letter to be delivery was only about 2 miles away, but I need a signature. In the end I told him to give me back my letter and I will delivery it by hand (I was afraid that he would not post, bin it instead, if I did not send it out by their very expensive next day delivery). I went a couple of mile away and try another post office again this they tried to sell their next day delivery but no way near as worrying as my local one. :evil:

 

I look on line to see if it was deliver ie signature they go my letter but not a signature. Does it take time to put a signature on line or is this not done anymore with recoded deliver letters which is not cheap £1.15 but still a hell of a lot cheaper than over £4 to £5 :-( not mentioned to having to listen to them trying to pressurizing you into buy this services. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Allwood

 

They all do it, probably to do with individual targets, profit margin, etc the best thing to do is make sure the first words you say are, 'I'm not interested in Special Delivery, then say 'Good Morning' it works for me, your in for a pretty quick service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Allwood,

I have had this (written) conversation with Royal mail and every time they fail to reply to the point I make.

They are failing to get signatures for RD mail as well as trying to sell SD service.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have told these people lots of time before that I was not interested in their special delivery, they obviously do not understand the word 'no' I told this guy taht I could hop on a bus and take the letter there myself, but no, this guy would not give up and in the end I was afraid to leave my letter with him, as he clearly was not happy that I would not hand over a fiver to him. I took my letter from him and left. What is really annoying is that after I had waited for over 20 minutes and my ticket said that there was 20 people in front of me and after waiting that lenght of time to be further stressed out the being pressured by the staff person behind the counter that was suppose to be giving me service, not grief.

It seems now that all services that are being funded from the public is being abused by the staff working in these organisation....I am sure these people are being paid a wage so why do they have to stress out their customers just for the hell of it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Allwood,

I have had this (written) conversation with Royal mail and every time they fail to reply to the point I make.

They are failing to get signatures for RD mail as well as trying to sell SD service.

 

Hi Silverfox1961, I have just checked 2 recorded delivery letter that I have sent within the last 3 weeks and what it is says is that Item was post with details of post office and date on my receipt and is being progressed thought our network for delivery. What does that mean....has it not been delivered:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has also happened with me with CitiFinancial. They bulk sign for their post rather than individually. The post office are only(I believe) putting up the signature for the first letter delivered instead of copying the same signature for all the letters.

This is what I think has happened. once it's past the 15 working days and you still have no confirmation, do a claim for lost post.

Whether they have actaully been delivered is anyones guess.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...