Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Juicer expoloded causing damage


abbie-jo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, im after some advice, last december i bought my daughter a juicer from lloyds pharmacy, in march this year we attempted to use it for the first time after reading instructions, within seconds this appliance exploded and sharp pieces of plastic, wire mesh, and the disc which is a grater and razor sharp were fired at speed around my daughters kitchen, myself, my daughter, my 2 grandchildren and newborn baby were in the room at the time and i still cannot believe we only suffered superficial scratches, the pram my newborn baby was in was hit by the disc grater which tore the hood of the pram, i emailed lloyds pharmacy the following day telling them what happened and attached photos of the appliance and the damage to my daughters pram, i recieved a response a week later apologising and offering £25 in lloyds pharmacy vouchers, ther also said they were aware of a "possible small malfunction" with their juicers and had recalled them, i refused to accept their offer, mainly due to them saying "possibility of small malfunction" and said i expected compensation for the pram as the hood was damaged beyond repair. a week later i recieved email stating it had been passed onto their insurers, after a month i asked them to give me an update but lloyds pharmacy said they were not allowed contact with customers once it had been passed onto their insurers. they did however give me number for insurers and said they would be in touch soon, its now been 6 month, ive left numerous voice messages with insurers but never have they returned call. i bought new pram and kept reciept to show them. i dont know what else to do and to be honest the incident could easily have been a fatality, i have the pics still if anyone would like to see just how bad this was, any advice would be appreciated, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am sure we would all love to see them. Did you go to the doctors to register your injuries? I assume you did take pictures of your injuries. Have any of you got any anxiety about using such equipment since then? Appliances are expected to be in a good working condition and are not expected to do this sort of thing.

 

I would say that you have a Claim and depending on the level of injury I am sure a solicitor would take it on. Generally one needs medical evidence but if you have photos your solicitor could obtain a doctors report. The insurance company are probably waiting for some sort of letter of claim from you or a solicitor. You were right to reject the miserly offer of £25 in vouchers it is worth much much more and should be in cash to all that were injured or had damage done to their property. You have plenty of time to sort this out.

 

Are you insured for legal expenses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, we didnt take any photos of injuries as they really were minor and actually didnt realise till next day what these were caused by, no gp visit was necessary either, to be honest once i realised no one had been badly hurt me and my daughter laughed about it, she actually thought the juice that hit her face and neck was blood caused by the disc grater slicing her throat, really all i wanted was them to pay for the cost of new pram i bought, i forgot to say their first email also said i should take the juicer straight to nearest lloyds pharmacy and they would give me £10 for it, obviously i didnt and still have it here. my daughter said she will never use an appliance like that again but im not sure if it is causing anxiety, my grandaughter fell off the bottom stair when it exploded with fright but wasnt hurt, and our ears suffered for a few hours after due to the noise it made, i do make light of this incident because if i actually stop and think what could have happened, especially if the hood had not been up on my babies pram it would without a doubt keep me awake at night. i do think someone was watching over us that day, also i have no insurance for legal purposes. is there anyway i can put the photos on here for people to see how bad it actually was. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nasty explosion. I only saw one photo but I get the idea!! I think you need to write to the insurance company complaining that your voice messages have not been acted upon. I can see they will merely say they could not identify your claim against their insured.

 

Explain the circumstances and do not detail the exact extent of your injuries. Say that you want to come to a settlement quickly and ask for the money for the pram and something for the injuries.

 

They will get back to you and hopefully they will be agreeable to settling, they probably will want to know what you have in mind, that is where it gets tricky. Try that and let's see their response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but can you explain to me the reasoning behind buying a whole new pram because the hood got damaged? Couldn't you simply get a replacement hood?

 

Re: the juicer, how much did you pay for it? I think there is no doubt that you are entitled to a full refund of the cost of it, and that really shouldn't be a problem (bear in mind that since you bought it, the claim should be in your name!).

 

Re: burden of proof, if the goods are less than 6 months old, they are deemed inherently faulty and the onus is on THEM to prove that it wasn't. To that effect, they are perfectly entitled to ask for the goods back so they can inspect them, and it is unreasonable of you to refuse to return it if they ask. I understand that it is moot at this point if the insurers are ignoring you, but bear it in mind if and when things progress from here.

 

Ok, now the claim itself: yes, there could have been a fatality, but there wasn't, and you don't get compensation for "might". Trauma, etc, unless you can substantiate it with psychiatric reports, medical evaluations and so on, forget it, if you can't document it, you won't get a penny unless it's as a good will gesture (and seeing their behaviour so far, I wouldn't hold my breath on that). Injuries, no pictures, and even with possible scars, you can't prove the juicer caused them, forget it as well, IMO.

 

So where does that leave you in real terms?

 

- reimbursement of juicer (seeing the pic, I think we can rule out repair as a viable option. :razz:)

- cost of new pram hood. I truly believe that seeking the whole cost of a new pram would be considered betterment, UNLESS the pram (do you actually mean a pram or a pushchair? a lot of the people use the term interchangeably) is a one piece affair where you can't get replacement parts, and you would have to show that is the case, OR that the cost of replacing the hood was actually more than the cost of buying a whole new pram, so depending on the brand/age/price paid, you need to alter your calculations accordingly.

 

You can ask for compensation for the fright etc... but even if they accept to something to settle the claim, don't expect it to be a lot. TBH, I'd be surprised if they even consider it. If there has been a recall on the product, then they have fulfilled their obligation under duty of care, and it could be argued that you chose not to return the goods after all (yes, I know you probably weren't aware of the recall, but I am trying to foresee all the possible issues that may arise from such a claim).

 

if it were me, I would write to the insurers and remind them that you have now been waiting for a response from them since [date], that they have had plenty of time to deal with this case, which is after all fairly straightforward, their clients having admitted liability (the recall shows that they were aware of the fault in the product) and that you expect their offer of settlement within 14 days of this letter, or you will issue a Small Claims Summons against their client without further communication from yourself. Only send this if you do intend to follow on with the court summons.

 

Any questions, shoot. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would inform Trading Standards, maybe they have underestimated the small risk. That is a dangerous appliance, they need to investigate why it exploded, etc. Is it the first one to explode? Do they know they are exploding? Have they done enough to Recall them? Most people pay by credit/debit cards and can be tracked down. If you don't want to send it to Lloyds, take it to Trading Standards who will give you a receipt and report of the condition. They can then forward it on to Trading Standards.

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/navless/recall/recalldisplay.asp?id=253878

Edited by rebel11
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, the hood is attached to the pram so it wasnt possible to just buy the new hood, the juicer itself was on offer, so i only paid £15 for it, at first they offered me £10 as refund but they needed reciept, i didnt have it but thought it was wrong to offer less than i paid for it, they offered £25 in vouchers but these could only be spent on certain items, it was never my intention to claim any money from them but a friend suggested i send a photo of the damage to them and ask if they would be willing to pay for repairs or a new one, ive since bought new pram and it is because of their lack of contact and lloyds themselves now saying they cannot give any updates or have contact with the customer once it is passed onto the insurers, that has made me pursue this. yes i thank god no one was hurt, however next time maybe someone wont be as lucky. reading advice on here though, maybe i am wasting my time, i will write to insurers today and see if i get a reply. thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the hood is not replaceable separately, then yes, you are absolutely right to claim the cost of a replacement. Any advice has to be taken remembering that WE don't know what the stuff looks like, so have to act on worse case scenario.

 

Don't give up, you have every right not to be left out of pocket because of their negligence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. finally received call from NPA who deal with lloyds pharmacy insurance claims. lady said she was responding to voice message i left on tuesday. she apologised and said my claim had been mislaid and due to length of time i had waited they wanted it settled today. the lady offered a sum of money and asked if i would accept this and that they accepted full liability, i don't know if i can say the amount on here but it is more than what i paid for a new pram. she didn't require receipts or photos of damage. ive received email confirmin they accept lability and cheque has now been issued. i know its taken a while but im shocked at how quickly they have dealt with it this mornin without any questions asked. ! !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine they know of the problems around this item and are worried that your will take a personal Injury action out. That would mean their liability and cost could mount up very quickly and much more than what they have offered. As there were injuries as per your OP then I can'r see why you can't accept it. They are happy, you are happy (but shocked) and we are happy for you.

 

How much, we are all dying to know!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...