Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mis-sold sky upgrade


tamd88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all! Just joined the forum tonight, looking for a little advice, sorry if i tread on old ground!

 

I've had sky tv, phone and broadband for almost a year and a half now. Since joining my tv package has been all the entertainment packs (no sky sports or movies). Towards the end of last month i called up Sky to enquire how much it would cost to add on all sky sports and sky movies channels. Up until that point i had been paying £44 per month. I was advised that my new monthly payment would be £48 per month. I had an inckling that this may be wrong but i made sure (on two occassions) that i repeated everything and got the operator to confirm my new monthly cost. On both occassions the operator agreed that a full tv package, my current phone package and my current broadband package would £48 per month. Based on this verbal quote i asked for these new products to be added to my package.

 

What happened next i half expected. Lone behold got a bill through for much much more than i was quoted. Its going to be around £70 a month.

 

Would i be correct in saying that Sky lawfully would have to stick by their verbal quote (wrong or not) and the only way they can correct this wrong is by then writing to me and giving me 31 days notice of change of subscription fee as set out in their terms & conditions. Or (i know its a longshot) are they tied in to their verbal quote for longer than that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought you would at least have right to be put back in the position you were before as in old package. Dont know about them having to honor described fee unless you recorded it of course and can argue that. Thing is what verbally quoted in any way on the system? If not might be a losing argument as they could say just a mistake. Thing is you hinted you knew the price sounded wrong, but hey maybe there is some offer on for all you know you could have thought, but sometimes our suspicions are right.

 

If I were you I would straight away raise a complaint online through the mysky site and take it from there. You never know if they value your custom they may honor the mistake. The escalation dept once complaint unresolved first time do have some powers. But if not recorded and sky say didnt happen its your word against theirs, see how you go along xx

 

ps. Ida in fife hot on these topics, she may add her knowledge at some point xx

Edited by loopinlouie
Link to post
Share on other sites

yip as you assumed the £48 quoted was for tv alone not for all 3

 

they will say it was a mis- understanding

 

there is a possibility that they may be able to listen to the call

 

do as lou says and send an email stating what you have here and request the call be listened too and the price given honoured for at least a small period

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks to both of you, i'll give that a try. Just a note though, Ida you said that the price of £48 was for the tv only. Funny thing is, when you look at the breakdown on the bill the tv on its own is £52 i think, so the £48 quoted doesnt come up anywhere at all. But your right in what you say, thats obvisouly what the guy was qouting me, tv alone. Would you say its easier emailing them rather than calling them first then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was £48 until the 1st sept it's now £51.

 

You can do either, just that they guys dealing with emails have more time to look into it.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...