Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you ask your GP to get a second opinion on the NHS?  (I ought to know because I'm a retired NHS manager, but worked in mental health where x-rays didn't really feature very much(!).)   Your GP may be reluctant for various reasons but you've got nothing to lose by asking.  Might be difficult if there's only one consultant in that specialty locally.   If that is a non-starter, you could ask your GP for a private referral if any of the relevant specialists run private clinics.  Your son'll get seen quicker and an initial private consultation shouldn't cost more than about a couple of hundred quid.  Then take it from there.   (Emphasise to your GP what your real concerns are and why you have them - even if it's just "I looked it up on the internet and it looks like this which can lead to serious complications.  What do you think?  I'm really worried...")   EDIT:  Just looked on my local NHS Clinical Commissioning Group website and searched for "second opinion" but nothing comes up...  I thought you were entitled to one - you'll have to ask your GP.  Or look on your own CCG site.  Oh - despite being a NHS manager I have paid to see a consultant privately.  £150 well spent - if you can afford it... which I appreciate not everyone can.
    • dont think they are even allowed to offer settlement by instalments, they are not creditors.   read the letter carefully and understand what it doesn't actually say....like the word WILL anywhere.   they,  a DCA, can't recommend anything and their client most certainly wouldn't have disclosed anything to a powerless DCA about what their solicitors might or might not have said to them. and ofcourse a solicitor is in no position whatsoever to suggest to their client they get back to the DCA and tell the DCA to tell you their client will accept instalments!   the letter is a load of ole BS that is concocted by the dca without any input or knowledge of their client nor their clients solicitor...   dx      
    • The paediatric orthopaedic consultant at the fracture clinic told us today that he believes it is just a sprain behind the knee. I'm concerned my GP will say something along the lines of, 'you have seen a consultant, he says it will heal in 2 to 3 weeks, you don't know more than him!', or something like that. It's just that I believe I can clearly see a fracture. And as there was no fall or hard knock, only a very tightly streched knee bending at an angle behind, with a load. I figured that the temdon must have pulled some bone up. And thats the injury I found online. I totally take on board what you are saying. You are correct. I guess I'll see what my GP says tomorrow, hopefully she allows me to email the images, if she doesent have access to them already. Thanks again
    • With the global market for recycled cardboard worth billions of dollars, it is attracting criminals. View the full article
    • UK house prices are predicted to fall but a report spells out why property may remain out of reach. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • Curry’s cancelled my order but took the money anyway. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423055-curry%E2%80%99s-cancelled-my-order-but-took-the-money-anyway/
      • 11 replies
    • Father passed away - Ardent Credit Services (Vodafone) now claiming he owes money. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/423040-father-passed-away-ardent-credit-services-vodafone-now-claiming-he-owes-money/
      • 9 replies
    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 6 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 16 replies
hovercraft

red light..........

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3627 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Traffic lights were on amber, braked late, light was red by the time I stopped just after the white line, reversed back. No problems with any traffic.

 

I had one some years ago in which I did jump a red light albeit unknowingly, in Dorset, yet they didn't even bother to send a photo (something about not being a criminal offence or something).

 

How long to wait until I get a ticket/fine while driving a company vehicle, and is it worth going to court to argue.

 

Thanks for any help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the junction even covered by a camera?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Then I guess the next point of interest would be how far over the white line did you travel and how long after the red light came on did this occur?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is. . . .did the camera flash?? Most cameras won't activate unless you actually go through the junction, i.e. - actually continue driving through it, rather than just going slightly over the stop line.

 

However, if the camera did flash - the Police must send out an NIP (Notice of Intended Prosecution) to the registered keeper, e.g. - the lease company, so it may take a month or so, by the time the lease co. or your company reply and it then makes it's way to you.

 

Wait and see. . . If you get the NIP, then we'll worry about the next step! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Passed the line by about 1 meter, amber when passed the line, but red when stopped passed the line.

 

Flash? No idea.

 

Thanks for the replies, as said above, have to wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter if you cross by 1 inch or 1 mile. The offence would be failing to stop at a red light. You must stop before the white line. After the white line is an offence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't matter if you cross by 1 inch or 1 mile. The offence would be failing to stop at a red light. You must stop before the white line. After the white line is an offence.

 

No one is debating whether "the offence" of crossing the white line occurred, we are trying to ascertain the likelihood of a "red light camera" having flashed in this instance.

 

As for you're "1inch past the line is an offence", it is stupid to imply such "transgressions" would be prosecuted or indeed that there is any reasonable method of acurately measuring such an "offence", unless they borrow the "hawkeye" technology from Wimbledon!

 

If the OP stopped within about 1mtr of the line then reversed, I would doubt that this would have triggered a photo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid????

 

I think not Mr intelligent! Try parking 1 " over the line of a parking space in london and see if they think it is stupid when they slap a ticket on your car. Try only scraping an inch of paint of a police car and see if they also think it would be stupid to do anything. The law is clear. Stop before the line, not within a distance passed the line that you think is alright guv.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stupid????

 

I think not Mr intelligent! Try parking 1 " over the line of a parking space in london and see if they think it is stupid when they slap a ticket on your car. Try only scraping an inch of paint of a police car and see if they also think it would be stupid to do anything. The law is clear. Stop before the line, not within a distance passed the line that you think is alright guv.

 

Oh, I am sorry. I didn't realise we were now talking about a parking offence, which would be monitored by a human CEO, and could/should have been checked by the driver when they exited the vehicle, or damage to a vehicle (which could be criminal damage.)

 

I was under the impression we were still discussing the white line at a traffic light system which has no practical method of measuring an offence of being 1 inch over a white line and I have never heard of such a prosecution taking place. If you have, please could you refer us to the case number.

 

The OP did not come on CAG to ask if we agreed whether he had stopped "within a distance passed the line that you think is alright guv", he knows he should have stopped before the line but failed to do so on this occasion. He now is seeking opinions as to whether there is the POSSIBILITY that his lapse on this occasion may result in a prosecution.

 

I take it from your (unhelpful) contribution to this thread that you think the OP should be hung drawn and quartered for his lapse at this white line and if, in fact, no letter arrives regarding this offence in the next couple of weeks, then he should hand himself in to the nearest police station for immediate incarsaration. :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree - what is it with people arguing the toss on these forums; they are intended to "help" people, not offer a venue for people to bicker pointlessly about the ins and outs of the case.

 

Help people, Help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last time I checked, the 'Notice of intended prosecution' had to be delivered within 21 days.

 

The fine debate about 'how far over the line' is important, and I am not sure if the OP means the front of the car passed by a metre, or the back. Last time I looked at a T/L camera, it would have needed the rear of the car almost 'middle for diddle' of the junction.

 

The OP knows he 'did wrong', doesn't need the Judge Jeffreys to tell him.

 

Whenever I have needed to formulate a mitigation for a minor motoring offence, I nearly always end up proving 'careless driving' instead. Ho hum............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies; the back of the vehicle was about 1m pass the line, the front was about 2m short of the middle of the junction, before I reversed.

 

My vehicle has got a binding brake problem (booked-in to fix) and no ABS, so when I initally braked, the brakes locked-up a bit, so I quickly realised the brakes and braked again. Though that said I did brake late, and was driving within the speed limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was a digital camera, getting a NIP is high. If film based (and there are still many of these, And are rotated) you may even have been flashed, but (a) there may have been no film in the camera, having been used up previously, or (b) no camera was in the housing.

 

There a good chance you'll hear nothing, just keep your fingers crossed....!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Last time I checked, the 'Notice of intended prosecution' had to be delivered within 21 days.

 

The fine debate about 'how far over the line' is important, and I am not sure if the OP means the front of the car passed by a metre, or the back. Last time I looked at a T/L camera, it would have needed the rear of the car almost 'middle for diddle' of the junction.

 

The OP knows he 'did wrong', doesn't need the Judge Jeffreys to tell him.

 

Whenever I have needed to formulate a mitigation for a minor motoring offence, I nearly always end up proving 'careless driving' instead. Ho hum............

 

NIP needs to be with the RK within 14 days of the offence.

 

A red light offence is for any part of a vehicle to travel across the line once the light is red. If the front of the vehicle crosses the line on amber (or green), but if there is no motion once the light is red then no offence is committed. Also, there has to be motion to trigger a red light camera...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but if there is no motion once the light is red then no offence is committed. Also, there has to be motion to trigger a red light camera...

 

but would reversing motion trigger it? and if so, would the NIP show a negative speed being travelled at the time? Interesting possibilities if it does. :razz:

Edited by crem

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it doesn't, and the period where the induction loops are active and capable of being triggered is tightly controlled and part of the site certification process. There's a Home Office Guidance document that provides the operational and installation guudelines available online. My brain hurt for days after reading it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...